Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Colorado Court of Appeals (1)
- Colorado General Assembly (1)
- Colorado Supreme Court (1)
-
- Constitutionality (1)
- Cooper v. Aaron (1)
- Detention (1)
- Due process (1)
- Enemy combatants (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- History (1)
- Judicial power (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Judicial supremacy (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Procedure (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- States (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Williams v. Georgia (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cooper's Quiet Demise (A Short Response To Professor Strauss), Frederic M. Bloom
Cooper's Quiet Demise (A Short Response To Professor Strauss), Frederic M. Bloom
Publications
No abstract provided.
State Courts Unbound, Frederic M. Bloom
State Courts Unbound, Frederic M. Bloom
Publications
We may not think that state courts disobey binding Supreme Court precedent, but occasionally state courts do. In a number of important cases, state courts have actively defied apposite Supreme Court doctrine, and often it is the Court itself that has invited them to.
This Article shows state courts doing the unthinkable: flouting Supreme Court precedent, sometimes at the Court's own behest. The idea of state court defiance may surprise us. It is not in every case, after all, that state courts affirmatively disobey. But rare events still have their lessons, and we should ask how and why they emerge. …
The Early History Of The Colorado Court Of Appeals, Robert M. Linz, Claire E. Munger
The Early History Of The Colorado Court Of Appeals, Robert M. Linz, Claire E. Munger
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Accounting: Habeas Corpus And Enemy Combatants, Emily Calhoun
The Accounting: Habeas Corpus And Enemy Combatants, Emily Calhoun
Publications
The judiciary should impose a heavy burden of justification on the executive when a habeas petitioner challenges the accuracy of facts on which an enemy combatant designation rests. A heavy burden of justification will ensure that the essential institutional purposes of the writ--and legitimate, separated-powers government--are preserved, even during times of national exigency. The institutional purposes of the writ argue for robust judicial review rather than deference to the executive. Moreover, the procedural flexibility traditionally associated with the writ gives the judiciary the tools to ensure that a heavy burden of justification can be imposed.
Delivering User-Centric Services At The Colorado Supreme Court Library, Robert M. Linz
Delivering User-Centric Services At The Colorado Supreme Court Library, Robert M. Linz
Publications
No abstract provided.