Law Commons^™

The Insolvency Effect On Attorney-Client Privilege, Anna Piszczatowski

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

“The attorney-client privilege is the oldest of the privileges for confidential communications known to the common law.” This privilege has been held as sacred and essential to encourage complete and candid communication between attorneys and their clients. In fact, if the attorney’s “professional mission” is to be carried out appropriately to the fullest extent, then the attorney must be able to acquire all the information necessary to represent his client. Therefore, the privilege allows unfettered communication, for the benefit of both parties.

By carving more exceptions to the privilege, as bankruptcy courts, and even the Supreme Court, have in …

Trustee's Ability To Waive Individual Debtor’S Attorney-Client Privilege, Rebecca Leaf

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Courts disagree about whether a trustee may waive an individual debtor's attorney-client privilege. Although the Supreme Court has addressed the issue in the case of corporate debtors, it has not done so in the case of individual debtors. Thus, lower courts have adopted three approaches to cases involving individual debtors: allowing the trustee to always waive privilege, never allowing the trustee to waive privilege, and a balancing approach.

This memo explores the importance of the attorney-client privilege, its relevant statutory bases, Supreme Court precedent, and the three approaches mentioned above. This memo also considers the advantages and disadvantages of …

The Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege: A Study Of The Participants, Vincent C. Alexander

Faculty Publications

Empirical research on the practical effects of the attorney-client privilege in the corporate context has been almost nonexistent. This Article seeks to help fill the gap by synthesizing traditional doctrinal analysis with the results of a survey of individuals with first-hand information about the subject: corporate attorneys, corporate management, and federal judges and magistrates. The survey, which consisted of 182 interviews in New York City, produced a broad range of information about some of the assumptions underlying the corporate privilege, the forms and processes of corporate attorney-client communications and the adjudication of privilege claims.