Law Commons^™

Recent Private International Law Developments Before The Supreme Court Of Canada, Antonin I. Pribetic

Antonin I. Pribetic

A trilogy of interesting cases involving private international law recently wended their way to the Supreme Court of Canada: (1) King v. Drabinsky (an Ontario case addressing the applicability of the Charter in respect of the enforcement of a foreign judgment); (2) Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. v. Lloyd's Underwriters (a British Columbia case involving declaratory relief in the context of parallel proceedings and forum non conveniens); and (3) Yugraneft v. Rexx Management Corporation (an Alberta case which affirmed that the two-year limitation period under s.3 of Alberta's Limitations Act, governs when a party seeks the recognition and enforcement in Alberta …

An 'Unconventional Truth': Conflict Of Laws Issues Arising Under The Cisg, Antonin I. Pribetic

Antonin I. Pribetic

This article discusses the applicability of the CISG from a Canadian conflict of laws perspective - both in terms of jurisdiction and choice of law. The analysis is framed by providing an outline of the key jurisdictional and choice of law principles developed within Canadian jurisprudence. Following a brief contextual overview of the CISG, Articles 1(1) (a) and 1(1) (b) and Article 6 of the CISG are highlighted, with specific reference to recent Canadian and foreign judicial decisions and foreign arbitral awards involving Canadian parties. The article concludes with a clarion call to justice stakeholders, particularly, Canadian commercial lawyers and …

Staking Claims Against Foreign Defendants In Canada: Choice Of Law And Jurisdiction Issues Arising From The In Personam Exception To The Mocambique Rule For Foreign Immovables, Antonin I. Pribetic

Antonin I. Pribetic

Canadian courts have struggled in distinguishing between in personam jurisdiction and subject-matter jurisdiction (and specifically the Mocambique rule). In particular, they appear to overlook the two-fold jurisdictional requirement that in order to proceed in a given case they must have both types of jurisdiction - in personam and subject-matter - and that when jurisdictional challenges arise due to the fact that the dispute deals with foreign immovables Canadian courts, influenced by the post-Morguard focus on in personam jurisdiction, are dealing with the foreign land question under the rubric of in personam jurisdiction, not under the traditional heading of subject-matter jurisdiction. …

The 'Trial Warrior': Applying Sun Tzu's The Art Of War To Trial Advocacy, Antonin I. Pribetic

Antonin I. Pribetic

This paper takes an interdisciplinary approach to an analysis of the Western (common law) adversarial system based upon the following theory of strategic functionalism: the form (tactics based upon procedural and evidentiary rules) is a function of the content (strategy based upon legal principles and policies and client-based remedies).Applying Jungian analysis, the following three (3) conceptual models and corresponding lawyer archetypes emerge:

1.the client-centric model (e.g. the “the “Warrior” / the “zealous advocate”);

2.the justice-centric model (e.g. the “Lover/Medial”/ the “ethical professional”); and

3.the science-centric model (e.g. the “Sovereign” or the “Magician/Trickster”/ the “knowledge technocrat”).

The paper then considers whether …

Trial And Error - Balancing The Scales Of Justice Through The Doctrines Of Stare Decisis And Ex Proprio Motu, Antonin I. Pribetic

Antonin I. Pribetic

Many will be familiar with the legal axiom: Great cases, like hard cases, make bad law. This comment addresses the obverse: Bad cases, like ordinary cases, make hard law. Put another way, to what extent should a judge or appellate court be bound by the doctrine of stare decisis when confronted with a legal precedent which is incorrect?

Bringing Locus Into Focus: A Choice-Of-Law Methodology For Cisg-Based Concurrent Contract And Product Liability Claims, Antonin I. Pribetic

Antonin I. Pribetic

The article discusses choice-of-law theories for both contractual and tort/product liability claims governed by the CISG. The underlying theme is that concurrent claims are not necessarily equivalent claims. While concurrent liability in contract and tort (namely, product liability) may be applicable or alternative remedies available, the focus of the CISG is the harmonization of rules governing international sale contracts. The article argues that factors such as the place of injury or where the damages are sustained are less relevant than the situs of the contract, based upon the view that, without privity of contract, the concurrent tort would not arise. …