Law Commons^™

Lessons In Price Stability From The U.S. Real Estate Market Collapse, Andrea J. Boyack

Andrea J Boyack

The U.S. residential housing market collapse illustrates the consequences of ignoring risk while funding mortgage borrowing. Collateral over-valuation was a foundational piece of the crisis. Over the past few decades, secondary markets, securitization, policy and psychology increased the flow of funds into real estate. At the same time, financial market segmentation divorced risk from reward. Increased mortgage capital availability, unmitigated by proper risk allocation, led to real estate price inflation. Social trends and government policies exacerbated both the mortgage capital over-supply and the risk-valuation disconnect.

The Dodd-Frank Act inadequately addresses the underlying asset valuation problem. Federal regulation may support market …

Underwater And Not Walking Away: Shame, Fear And The Social Management Of The Housing Crisis, Brent T. White

Brent T. White

Despite reports that homeowners are increasingly “walking away” from their mortgages, most homeowners continue to make their payments even when they are significantly underwater. This article suggests that most homeowners choose not to strategically default as a result of two emotional forces: 1) the desire to avoid the shame and guilt of foreclosure; and 2) exaggerated anxiety over foreclosure’s perceived consequences. Moreover, these emotional constraints are actively cultivated by the government and other social control agents in order to encourage homeowners to follow social and moral norms related to the honoring of financial obligations - and to ignore market and …

The Case For "Cramdown": Eliminating The Practical And Ideological Barriers To Pure Mortgage Modification, Peter J. Leo

Peter J Leo

This article was prepared for a seminar in Consumer Protection. The article makes the case that Congress should modify the Bankruptcy Code to allow for judicial modification of home mortgages on a bankrupt’s principal residence as a means of combating the foreclosure crisis. The article examines two different proposals originally published in the Minnesota Law Review and the Yale Journal on Regulation, examines some of the deficiencies in those proposals, and concludes that “cramdown” will be a more effective means of keeping consumers in their homes.