Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Brady v. Maryland (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitutional criminal procedure (1)
-
- Criminal Justice Reform (1)
- Criminal discovery (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Democratic theory (1)
- Federal civil rights (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Politics (1)
- Poverty law (1)
- Public Defense (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Race and the law (1)
- Right to Counsel (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Social Welfare (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Democracy Enhancement And The Sixth Amendment Right To Choose, Janet Moore
Democracy Enhancement And The Sixth Amendment Right To Choose, Janet Moore
Janet Moore
A democracy deficit undermines the legitimacy of criminal justice systems. People enmeshed in these systems are disproportionately poor people and people of color with little voice in creating or implementing the governing law. A stark example is the Sixth Amendment right to choose a lawyer. This understudied and undertheorized right is protected for criminal defendants who can afford to hire counsel. Yet according to Supreme Court dicta and rulings by other courts across the country, poor people “have no right to choose” their lawyers. This Article argues that the Sixth Amendment right to choose should apply to the overwhelming majority …
Oppositional Politics In Criminal Law And Procedure, Janet Moore
Oppositional Politics In Criminal Law And Procedure, Janet Moore
Janet Moore
There is a democracy deficit at the intersection of crime, race, and poverty. The causes and consequences of hyperincarceration disproportionately affect those least likely to mount an effective oppositional politics: poor people and people of color. This Article breaks new ground by arguing that the democracy deficit calls for a democracy-enhancing theory of criminal law and procedure that modifies traditional justifications of retributivism, deterrence, and rehabilitation by prioritizing self-governance. Part I contextualizes the argument within cyclical retrenchments across movements for racial and economic justice. Part II sketches the contours of a democracy-enhancing theory. Part III turns that theoretical lens on …
Democracy And Criminal Discovery Reform After Connick And Garcetti, Janet Moore
Democracy And Criminal Discovery Reform After Connick And Garcetti, Janet Moore
Janet Moore
A leading cause of wrongful conviction and wasteful litigation in criminal cases is the nondisclosure of information beneficial to the defense by prosecutors and law enforcement as required by Brady v. Maryland. In Connick v. Thompson and Garcetti v. Ceballos, the Supreme Court weakened Brady’s enforceability by limiting the deterrent force of 42 U.S.C § 1983 liability. Connick highlights Garcetti’s implications as a criminal discovery case, which scholars have not fully analyzed. While Connick restricted § 1983 liability when prosecutors confess to suppressing exculpatory evidence, Garcetti restricted liability when prosecutors are disciplined for bringing Brady evidence to light.
Connick and …