Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Complexity And Simplicity In Law: A Review Essay (Cass R. Sunstein, Simpler: The Future Of Government (2003)), David M. Driesen
Complexity And Simplicity In Law: A Review Essay (Cass R. Sunstein, Simpler: The Future Of Government (2003)), David M. Driesen
David M Driesen
This essay discusses Cass Sunstein’s book, Simpler: The Future of Government, in order to advance our understanding of the concepts of complex and simple law. Many writers identify complexity with uncertainty and high cost. This essay argues that complexity bears no fixed relationship to costs or benefits. It also shows that complexity’s relationship to uncertainty is so ambiguous that it is profitable to treat complexity and uncertainty as separate concepts. It develops useful separate concepts of legal and compliance complexity that will aid efforts to simplify law, like the one Sunstein claims to have embarked upon. It also argues that …
Putting A Price On Carbon: The Metaphor, David M. Driesen
Putting A Price On Carbon: The Metaphor, David M. Driesen
David M Driesen
This Essay analyzes the characterization of both pollution taxes and so-called cap-and-trade programs addressing greenhouse gas emissions as policies that “put a price on carbon,” a characterization that has come to dominate both policy discussion and much modern scholarship on environmental instrument choice. It shows that the rationale for characterizing cap-and-trade— a quantitative rather than a pricing mechanism— as putting a price on carbon suggests that analysts should likewise treat traditional regulation as a mechanism putting a price on carbon. Treating “market-based mechanisms” as uniquely putting a price on carbon reflects and perpetuates a tendency to see markets and government …
Cost-Benefit Analysis And The Precautionary Principle: Can They Be Reconciled?, David M. Driesen
Cost-Benefit Analysis And The Precautionary Principle: Can They Be Reconciled?, David M. Driesen
David M Driesen
Conventional wisdom teaches us that cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and the precautionary principle conflict. CBA proponents consider precaution incoherent and irrational, while precautionary principle fans see CBA as a threat to environmental protection. Both sides, however, see these two concepts as conflicting. This Article questions the conventional view. It finds no conflict between the precautionary principle, properly understood, and the mere idea of taking costs and benefits into account in choosing environmental standards. The reasoning underlying this conclusion illuminates both concepts. Having revealed the theoretical possibility of precautionary CBA, it uses a case study of the climate disruption issue to begin …
Job Loss And The Incohernet Expansion Of Cost-Benefit Analysis, David M. Driesen
Job Loss And The Incohernet Expansion Of Cost-Benefit Analysis, David M. Driesen
David M Driesen
This piece discusses the question of whether regulatory agencies should quantify job loss stemming from government regulation for purposes of cost-benefit analysis. It argues that doing so produces biased analysis through double counting of regulatory costs and asymmetric analysis. It also argues that the dollar value of job loss defies quantification.
Two Cheers For Feasible Regulation: A Modest Response To Masur And Posner, David M. Driesen
Two Cheers For Feasible Regulation: A Modest Response To Masur And Posner, David M. Driesen
David M Driesen
This response to Masur and Posner's "Against Feasibility" argues that the feasibility principle has normative and practical advantages over cost-benefit analysis. Normatively, it shows that the happiness literature's suggestion that jobs may be much more important than consumption to welfare supports the feasibility principle's emphasis on maximizing pollution reduction without producing widespread plant shutdowns. It shows that the practical problems Masur and Posner associate with feasibility analysis arise under cost-benefit analysis as well.
Purposeless Construction, David M. Driesen
Purposeless Construction, David M. Driesen
David M Driesen
This Article critiques the Supreme Court’s tendency to embrace “purposeless construction” — statutory construction that ignores legislation underlying goals. It constructs a new democratic theory for purposeful construction, defined as an approach to construction that favors construction of ambiguous text to advance a statute’s underlying goal. That theory maintains that statutory goals, especially those set out in the legislative text or frequently proclaimed in public, tend to reflect public values to a greater extent than other statutory provisions. Politicians carefully choose goals for statutes that “sell” the statute to the public. In order to do this, they must announce goals …
Capping Carbon, David M. Driesen
Capping Carbon, David M. Driesen
David M Driesen
This article addresses the problem of how to set caps for a cap-and-trade program, a key problem in pending legislation addressing global climate disruption. Previous scholarship on emissions trading programs focuses overwhelmingly on trading’s advantages and sometimes wrongly portrays environmental improvement as an automatic byproduct of adopting a cap-and-trade approach. A trading program’s success, however, depends critically upon timely and effective cap setting. This article shows that often regulators have employed a best available technology (BAT) approach to cap setting for trading programs, i.e., setting the cap at a level that regulated polluters can achieve with government-identified technology. This descriptive …