Law Commons^™

A Constitutional Court In The Absence Of A Formal Constitution? On The Ramifications Of Appointing The Israeli Supreme Court As The Only Tribunal For Judicial Review, Guy E. Carmi

Guy E Carmi

This manuscript reviews an emerging debate in Israel regarding the appointment of the Supreme Court as a Constitutional Court. Specifically, it offers a critical analysis of the most recent proposed model, which is now in the initial legislative stages (The “Neeman Committee”), to appoint the Supreme Court as the sole constitutional arbiter.

First, the article offers an overview of the main processes that have occurred in the arena of Israeli constitutional law in the last decade, generally known as the “Constitutional Revolution.” Next, the article shows the nexus between this process and the revival of the constitutional court debate. Readers …

Under A Critical Race Theory Lens – Brown V. Board Of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone And Its Troubled Legacy, Carlo Pedrioli

Carlo A. Pedrioli

This critical book review argues that James T. Patterson’s narrative in, "Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy," is a mostly balanced historical reflection. Here, the term balanced will refer to giving consideration to both the negative and positive aspects of the phenomenon in question. To advance its thesis, the book review initially offers an overview of Patterson’s historical narrative and evaluation of the Brown legacy. Then the book review analyzes Patterson’s conclusions through a Critical Race Theory lens. Given the focus of Critical Race Theory on race and the law, especially on how …

Ohio Issue 1 Is Unconstitutional, Wilson R. Huhn

Wilson R. Huhn

This article discusses the constitutionality of Ohio Issue 1, an amendment to the state constitution that was adopted in a referendum by the people of the State of Ohio in November, 2004. The article consists of two parts. Part I sets forth arguments in support of the proposition that Ohio Issue 1 is unconstitutional. Part II sets forth arguments that have been or may be raised in support of Ohio Issue 1, and responds to each of those arguments.