Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Corporations (6)
- Law and Economics (6)
- Securities Law (6)
- Banking and Finance (5)
- Aiding and abetting (4)
-
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Commercial Law (3)
- Insider trading (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Rule 10b-5 (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Constitutional Law, Generally (2)
- Economics (2)
- Securities (2)
- Securities fraud (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Antitrust (1)
- Banking (1)
- CDO (1)
- CDS (1)
- Collateral participants (1)
- Collateralized debt obligations (1)
- Credit default swaps (1)
- Derivatives (1)
- Financial crisis (1)
- Financial innovation (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Investor protection (1)
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Law
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination of the Supreme Court’s Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud at the Expense of Investors
“Political” decisions such as Citizens United and National Federation of Independent Business (“Obamacare”) reflect the reactionary bent of several Supreme Court justices. But this reactionary trend is discernible in other areas as well. With regard to Rule 10b-5, the Court has handed down a series of decisions that could be grouped into four trilogies. The article examines the trend over the past 40 years which has become increasingly conservative and finally reactionary.
The …
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination of the Supreme Court’s Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud at the Expense of Investors
“Political” decisions such as Citizens United and National Federation of Independent Business (“Obamacare”) reflect the reactionary bent of several Supreme Court justices. But this reactionary trend is discernible in other areas as well. With regard to Rule 10b-5, the Court has handed down a series of decisions that could be grouped into four trilogies. The article examines the trend over the past 40 years which has become increasingly conservative and finally reactionary.
The …
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Janus Capital Group, Inc. V. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination Of The Supreme Court’S Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders: The Culmination of the Supreme Court’s Reactionary Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence Which Protects Fraud at the Expense of Investors
“Political” decisions such as Citizens United and National Federation of Independent Business (“Obamacare”) reflect the reactionary bent of several Supreme Court justices. But this reactionary trend is discernible in other areas as well. With regard to Rule 10b-5, the Court has handed down a series of decisions that could be grouped into four trilogies. The article examines the trend over the past 40 years which has become increasingly conservative and finally reactionary.
The …
Corporate Corruption And The Complicity Of Congress And The Supreme Court - The Tortuous Path From "Central Bank" To "Stoneridge Investment Partners, Llc V. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
No abstract provided.
Sarbanes-Oxley Five Years Later: Hero Or Villain., Charles W. Murdock
Sarbanes-Oxley Five Years Later: Hero Or Villain., Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
No abstract provided.
Why Not Tell The Truth: Deceptive Practices And The Financial Meltdown., Charles W. Murdock
Why Not Tell The Truth: Deceptive Practices And The Financial Meltdown., Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
No abstract provided.
Kern V. Arlington Ridge Pathology, S.D.: An Unsound Decision Illustrating A Lack Of Awareness Of Basic Corporate Law Principles, Charles W. Murdock
Kern V. Arlington Ridge Pathology, S.D.: An Unsound Decision Illustrating A Lack Of Awareness Of Basic Corporate Law Principles, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
No abstract provided.
Puelo V Topel: The Court Got It Wrong, Charles W. Murdock
Puelo V Topel: The Court Got It Wrong, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
No abstract provided.
A Primer On Pleading Securities Fraud Under Plsra: The Seventh Circuit’S Decision In Tellabs, Charles W. Murdock
A Primer On Pleading Securities Fraud Under Plsra: The Seventh Circuit’S Decision In Tellabs, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court’S Decisions In Arthur Andersen And Dura Pharmaceuticals, Charles W. Murdock
The Supreme Court’S Decisions In Arthur Andersen And Dura Pharmaceuticals, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
No abstract provided.
Parent Corporation Liability For Acts Of Its Subsidiary, Charles Murdock
Parent Corporation Liability For Acts Of Its Subsidiary, Charles Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
No abstract provided.
The Evolution Of The Supreme Court’S Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence:, Charles W. Murdock
The Evolution Of The Supreme Court’S Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence:, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: The Evolution of the Supreme Court’s Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence:
Protecting Fraud at the Expense of Investors
This article traces the evolution of Supreme Court jurisprudence over the past forty years through the prism of Rule 10b-5. It uses four “trilogies” to develop this evolution. At the start of the 1970s, the liberal trend characterized by the Warren Court still prevailed. An implied private cause of action was still in favor and litigators were viewed as private attorneys general, enforcing the securities laws to further the policy of protecting investors.
The expansion of Rule 10b-5 was slowed and more judicial …
The Big Banks: Background, Deregulation, Financial Innovation And Too Big To Fail, Charles W. Murdock
The Big Banks: Background, Deregulation, Financial Innovation And Too Big To Fail, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: The Big Banks: Background, Deregulation, Financial Innovation and Too Big to Fail
The U.S. economy is still reeling from the financial crisis that exploded in the fall of 2008. This article asserts that the big banks were major culprits in causing the crisis, by funding the non-bank lenders that created the toxic mortgages which the big banks securitized and sold to unwary investors. Paradoxically, banks which were then too big to fail are even larger today.
The article briefly reviews the history of banking from the Founding Fathers to the deregulatory mindset that has been present since 1980. It …
The Evolution Of The Supreme Court’S Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence: Protecting Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
The Evolution Of The Supreme Court’S Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence: Protecting Fraud At The Expense Of Investors, Charles W. Murdock
Charles W. Murdock
Summary: The Evolution of the Supreme Court’s Rule 10b-5 Jurisprudence:
Protecting Fraud at the Expense of Investors
This article traces the evolution of Supreme Court jurisprudence over the past forty years through the prism of Rule 10b-5. It uses four “trilogies” to develop this evolution. At the start of the 1970s, the liberal trend characterized by the Warren Court still prevailed. An implied private cause of action was still in favor and litigators were viewed as private attorneys general, enforcing the securities laws to further the policy of protecting investors.
The expansion of Rule 10b-5 was slowed and more judicial …