Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (23)
- Legal History (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
-
- Election Law (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Political Science (2)
- Child Psychology (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Clinical Psychology (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Developmental Psychology (1)
- Evidence (1)
- International Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Mental and Social Health (1)
- Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Publication
-
- Alan E Garfield (10)
- Jack Tsen-Ta LEE (3)
- Mark D. Rosen (2)
- Aaron J Shuler (1)
- Alec Stone Sweet (1)
-
- Barry Sullivan (1)
- Bruce A. Boyer (1)
- Craig Martin (1)
- David Schraub (1)
- Derek T. Muller (1)
- Donald G Gifford (1)
- Herman Schwartz (1)
- Jeremy R. Paul (1)
- Kent Greenfield (1)
- Kevin P. Chapman (1)
- Michael R Dimino (1)
- Raymond C. O'Brien Professor (1)
- Robert Cooter (1)
- Robert L Tsai (1)
- Sheldon Nahmod (1)
- Tara L. Grove (1)
- Thomas D. Lyon (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 34
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cheer On Separation Of School, Religious Messages, Alan E. Garfield
Cheer On Separation Of School, Religious Messages, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Shall The Twain Never Meet? Competing Narratives And Discourses Of The Rule Of Law In Singapore, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Shall The Twain Never Meet? Competing Narratives And Discourses Of The Rule Of Law In Singapore, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Jack Tsen-Ta LEE
This article aims to assess the role played by the rule of law in discourse by critics of the Singapore Government’s policies and in the Government’s responses to such criticisms. It argues that in the past the two narratives clashed over conceptions of the rule of law, but there is now evidence of convergence of thinking as regards the need to protect human rights, though not necessarily as to how the balance between rights and other public interests should be struck. The article also examines why the rule of law must be regarded as a constitutional doctrine in Singapore, the …
Supreme Court Ponders Drug-Detection Dog's 'Sniff Test', Alan E. Garfield
Supreme Court Ponders Drug-Detection Dog's 'Sniff Test', Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Schwartz: Comment On Mathias, Herman Schwartz
Affirmative Action In Education Weighed Again, Alan E. Garfield
Affirmative Action In Education Weighed Again, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
The Fight For Free Speech, Even If It's Offensive, Alan E. Garfield
The Fight For Free Speech, Even If It's Offensive, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
What's Wrong With Us Political System?, Alan E. Garfield
What's Wrong With Us Political System?, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Conceptualizing Constitutional Litigation As Anti-Government Expression: A Speech-Centered Theory Of Court Access, Robert L. Tsai
Conceptualizing Constitutional Litigation As Anti-Government Expression: A Speech-Centered Theory Of Court Access, Robert L. Tsai
Robert L Tsai
This Article proposes a speech-based right of court access. First, it finds the traditional due process approach to be analytically incoherent and of limited practical value. Second, it contends that history, constitutional structure, and theory all support conceiving of the right of access as the modern analogue to the right to petition government for redress. Third, the Article explores the ways in which the civil rights plaintiff's lawsuit tracks the behavior of the traditional dissident. Fourth, by way of a case study, the essay argues that recent restrictions - notably, a congressional limitation on the amount of fees counsel for …
First Principles, Jeremy R. Paul
First Principles, Jeremy R. Paul
Jeremy R. Paul
This commentary responds to Professor Frederick Schauer's article, Constitutional Positivism, which appears earlier in this issue of the Connecticut Law Review.
Parental Rights Vs. Best Interests Of The Child: A False Dichotomy In The Context Of Adoption, Annette R. Appell, Bruce A. Boyer
Parental Rights Vs. Best Interests Of The Child: A False Dichotomy In The Context Of Adoption, Annette R. Appell, Bruce A. Boyer
Bruce A. Boyer
I. Introduction: Identifying the Controversy The mythology of adoption involves a scenario in which a teenage girl gets pregnant, and neither she nor the father is ready to raise a child. Upon birth, these young parents voluntarily relinquish the baby to an upwardly mobile couple who have been waiting years to adopt. The adoptive parents become, in essence, the birth parents to the baby who grows up happy and well-adjusted. The birth parents vanish from the picture, perhaps eventually marrying and having additional children. No one looks back. But what happens to this myth when the birth mother changes her …
The Bill Of Rights And The Emerging Democracies, Jacek Kurczewski, Barry Sullivan
The Bill Of Rights And The Emerging Democracies, Jacek Kurczewski, Barry Sullivan
Barry Sullivan
Today, the influence of the US Bill of Rights can be traced through its remote offspring, including the Helsinki Agreement, the German Basic Law, the post-war French constitutions, and the European Convention on Human Rights. These documents have influenced recent developments in the emerging democracies of eastern and central Europe.
Health Care Back Where It Belongs, Before The Voters, Alan E. Garfield
Health Care Back Where It Belongs, Before The Voters, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Religious Right Versus Government Interest, Alan E. Garfield
Religious Right Versus Government Interest, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
8. Child Witnesses And The Confrontation Clause., Thomas D. Lyon, Julia A. Dente
8. Child Witnesses And The Confrontation Clause., Thomas D. Lyon, Julia A. Dente
Thomas D. Lyon
Reforming The Right To Legal Counsel In Singapore, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Reforming The Right To Legal Counsel In Singapore, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Jack Tsen-Ta LEE
This is an opinion prepared for the Criminal Law Committee of the Law Society of Singapore on an arrested person’s right to legal counsel in Singapore. Specifically, it deals with the following: (1) it summarizes pertinent aspects of the law relating to the right to legal counsel in Singapore; (2) it surveys a number of ASEAN and Commonwealth jurisdictions to determine how long after apprehension the right to counsel is generally accorded to arrested persons, and compares the legal position in these jurisdictions to the situation in Singapore; and (3) it examines two rights ancillary to the right to legal …
Family Law's Challenge To Religious Liberty, Raymond O'Brien
Family Law's Challenge To Religious Liberty, Raymond O'Brien
Raymond C. O'Brien Professor
FAMILY LAW’S CHALLENGE TO RELIGIOUS LIBERTY Raymond C. O’Brien ABSTRACT Towards the end of the 1960s, states began to enact no-fault divorce; eventually every state would permit marriages to be dissolved without extensive litigation, often on the ground of separation for a minimum period of time, or irreconcilable differences. Such innovative family law legislation challenged the heretofore dominant worldview, which viewed marriage as dissoluble only when circumstances were extreme. Throughout the 1970s an increasing number of adult men and women cohabited as same and opposite sex couples; their rights as nonmarital cohabitants protected under expanding Constitutional guarantees and judicial decisions. …
The Constitutional Bounding Of Adjudication: A Fuller(Ian) Explanation For The Supreme Court's Mass Tort Jurisprudence, Donald G. Gifford
The Constitutional Bounding Of Adjudication: A Fuller(Ian) Explanation For The Supreme Court's Mass Tort Jurisprudence, Donald G. Gifford
Donald G Gifford
In this Article, I argue that the Supreme Court is implicitly piecing together a constitutionally mandated model of bounded adjudication governing mass torts, using decisions that facially rest on disparate constitutional provisions. This model constitutionally restricts common law courts from adjudicating the rights, liabilities, and interests of persons who are neither present before the court nor capable of being defined with a reasonable degree of specificity. I find evidence for this model in the Court’s separate decisions rejecting tort-based climate change claims, global settlements of massive asbestos litigation, and punitive damages awards justified as extra-compensatory damages. These new forms of …
Obama Didn't Deny Court's Right Of Review, Alan E. Garfield
Obama Didn't Deny Court's Right Of Review, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Liberty Isn't The Issue In Health Care Case, Alan E. Garfield
Liberty Isn't The Issue In Health Care Case, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
The Structural Constitutional Principle Of Republican Legitimacy, Mark D. Rosen
The Structural Constitutional Principle Of Republican Legitimacy, Mark D. Rosen
Mark D. Rosen
Representative democracy does not spontaneously occur by citizens gathering to choose laws. Instead, republicanism takes place within an extensive legal framework that determines who gets to vote, how campaigns are conducted, what conditions must be met for representatives to make valid law, and many other things. Many of the “rules-of-the-road” that operationalize republicanism have been subject to constitutional challenges in recent decades. For example, lawsuits have been brought against “partisan gerrymandering” (which has led to most congressional districts not being party-competitive, but instead being safely Republican or Democratic) and against onerous voter identification requirements (which reduce the voting rates of …
A Legal Backgrounder On By-Elections, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
A Legal Backgrounder On By-Elections, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Jack Tsen-Ta LEE
The expulsion of Yaw Shin Leong, the Member of Parliament for Hougang Single Member Constituency, from the Workers’ Party has once again thrust the issue of the Singapore Government’s policy on by-elections into the limelight. This opinion piece considers whether the Government is right in taking the view that it has wide discretion to determine when, and if, to hold a by-election; and the possible consequences of an existing Non-constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) standing as a candidate in a by-election.
When Is A Lie An Affront To The Law?, Alan E. Garfield
When Is A Lie An Affront To The Law?, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
The Exceptions Clause As A Structural Safeguard, Tara Grove
The Exceptions Clause As A Structural Safeguard, Tara Grove
Tara L. Grove
Scholars have long viewed the Exceptions Clause of Article III as a serious threat to the Supreme Court’s central constitutional function: establishing definitive and uniform rules of federal law. In this Article, I argue that the Clause has been fundamentally misunderstood. The Exceptions Clause, as employed by Congress, serves primarily to facilitate, not to undermine, the Supreme Court’s constitutional role. Drawing on recent social science research, I assert that Congress has a strong incentive to use its control over federal jurisdiction to promote the Court’s role in settling disputed federal questions. Notably, this argument has considerable historical support. When the …
Free Will Paradigms, Kent Greenfield
Free Will Paradigms, Kent Greenfield
Kent Greenfield
One of the iconic issues in American law and politics is the question of free will—sometimes known as agency, choice, or autonomy, or the absence of duress, coercion, and compulsion. In politics, whether one is liberal or conservative, we balk at government limitations on choice and fight those limitations with legal arguments about rights and political rhetoric about freedom. Liberals demand access to abortions, want the ability to purchase medical marijuana, and bristle at pat-down searches before boarding a plane. Conservatives dislike requirements to buy health insurance or pay taxes, rail against limits on gun ownership and school prayer, and …
Invisible Federalism And The Electoral College, Derek Muller
Invisible Federalism And The Electoral College, Derek Muller
Derek T. Muller
What role do States have when the Electoral College disappears? With the enactment of the National Popular Vote on the horizon and an imminent presidential election in which a nationwide popular vote determines the winner, States would continue to do what they have done for hundreds of years — administer elections. The Constitution empowers States to decide who votes for president, and States choose who qualifies to vote based on factors like age or felon status. This power of States, a kind of “invisible federalism,” is all but ignored in Electoral College reform efforts. In fact, the power of the …
Not The Power To Destroy: An Effects Theory Of The Tax Power, Robert D. Cooter, Neil Siegel
Not The Power To Destroy: An Effects Theory Of The Tax Power, Robert D. Cooter, Neil Siegel
Robert Cooter
The Supreme Court of the United States requires a tax power jurisprudence that is consistent with its restrictions on the Commerce Clause. Otherwise Congress could “tax” its way around any judicially enforceable limits on the commerce power. Existing case law, however, does not offer such jurisprudence. This paper provides the missing theory by analyzing constitutional text, structure, history, and precedent with help from economics. The key difference between a tax and a penalty turns on the effects of the exaction. Taxes raise revenues because they dampen behavior without preventing it for many people. Penalties, by contrast, raise little or no …
The Structural Constitutional Principle Of Republican Legitimacy, Mark D. Rosen
The Structural Constitutional Principle Of Republican Legitimacy, Mark D. Rosen
Mark D. Rosen
Democracy does not spontaneously occur by citizens gathering to choose laws. Instead, representative democracy takes place within an extensive legal framework that determines such matters as who gets to vote, how campaigns are conducted, and what conditions must be met for representatives to make valid law. Many of the “rules of the road” that operationalize republicanism have been subject to constitutional challenges in recent decades. For example, lawsuits have been brought against partisan gerrymandering—which is partly responsible for the fact that most congressional districts are no longer party competitive, but instead are either safely Republican or safely Democratic—and against onerous …
Inside The Civil Rights Ring: Statutory Jabs And Constitutional Haymakers, Aaron J. Shuler
Inside The Civil Rights Ring: Statutory Jabs And Constitutional Haymakers, Aaron J. Shuler
Aaron J Shuler
Civil rights litigators use statutory and constitutional attacks to combat inequality. Each approach has its advantages and drawbacks developed through interpretation by U.S. courts. The first major decision that shaped modern civil rights was the Civil Rights Cases that dodged a constitutional attack to withdraw most private acts of discrimination out of reach until the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed and validated in Heart of Atlanta v. U.S. In addition to the coupling of statutory attacks with private discrimination and constitutional challenges to state biases, statutory attacks have proven to be more adept at addressing disparate impacts as …
The Long And Winding Road From Monroe To Connick, Sheldon Nahmod
The Long And Winding Road From Monroe To Connick, Sheldon Nahmod
Sheldon Nahmod
In this article, I address the historical and doctrinal development of § 1983 local government liability, beginning with Monroe v. Pape in 1961 and culminating in the Supreme Court’s controversial 2011 failure to train decision in Connick v. Thompson. Connick has made it exceptionally difficult for § 1983 plaintiffs to prevail against local governments in failure to train cases. In the course of my analysis, I also consider the oral argument and opinions in Connick as well as various aspects of § 1983 doctrine. I ultimately situate Connick in the Court’s federalism jurisprudence which doubles back to Justice Frankfurter’s view …
The Natural And The Familiar In Politics And Law, Michael R. Dimino