Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Does Due Process Have An Original Meaning? On Originalism, Due Process, Procedural Innovation . . . And Parking Tickets, Lawrence Rosenthal
Does Due Process Have An Original Meaning? On Originalism, Due Process, Procedural Innovation . . . And Parking Tickets, Lawrence Rosenthal
Lawrence Rosenthal
Originalism – the view that constitutional provisions should be interpreted as they were “understood at the time of the law’s enactment” – is the ascendant method of constitutional interpretation. In particular, originalists argue that the Constitution's open-ended provisions should be interpreted in light of their generally understood legal meaning at the time of their framing. An originalist view of due process -- entitling civil and criminal defendants to those procedures considered "due" at the time of framing -- would accordingly condemn any number of innovations in criminal and civil procedures' that alter framing-era procedural rights, such as the novel systems …
Dred Scott And The Political Question Doctrine, Wesley M. Oliver
Dred Scott And The Political Question Doctrine, Wesley M. Oliver
Wesley M Oliver
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Dred Scott After 150 Years: A Grievous Wound Remembered, John L. Gedid
Introduction: Dred Scott After 150 Years: A Grievous Wound Remembered, John L. Gedid
John L. Gedid
No abstract provided.
¿Interpretación O Configuración Del Poder?: Acerca Del Precedente Que Establece La Procedencia Del Rac Contra Resoluciones Estimatorias, Óscar Súmar
Oscar Súmar
No abstract provided.