Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Caveat, December 1968 Dec 1968

The Caveat, December 1968

Caveat

No abstract provided.


The Caveat, October 1968 Oct 1968

The Caveat, October 1968

Caveat

No abstract provided.


The Caveat, Feb/March 1968 Feb 1968

The Caveat, Feb/March 1968

Caveat

No abstract provided.


Good Offices As A Peaceful Means Of Settling Regional Differences, Sompong Sucharitkul Jan 1968

Good Offices As A Peaceful Means Of Settling Regional Differences, Sompong Sucharitkul

Publications

Much has been written about the various methods of pacific settlement of disputes specifically mentioned above. But very little literature can be found on "other peaceful means of their own choice." It is the purpose of this modest essay thus to supplement to some extent the missing link by an effort to throw some light on one of the pacific procedures not enumerated in the Charter, but is nonetheless growing in usefulness and popularity over the recent years. The present study will therefore be concentrated upon the procedure of "Good Offices" as a peaceful means of adjusting regional differences. As …


The Caveat, January 1968 Jan 1968

The Caveat, January 1968

Caveat

No abstract provided.


Variations On The Theme Of Dombrowski V. Pfister: Federal Intervention In State Criminal Proceedings Affecting First Amendment Rights, Marc Stickgold Jan 1968

Variations On The Theme Of Dombrowski V. Pfister: Federal Intervention In State Criminal Proceedings Affecting First Amendment Rights, Marc Stickgold

Publications

One of the most rapidly changing and complex areas of the law revolves around the propriety and wisdom of federal court ((interference" with state court proceedings involving first amendment rights. Mr. Stickgold examines the doctrine being evolved in this area, centering the discussion around Dombrowski v. Pfister and cases that have followed it. The author reports that several courts have not followed the Dombrowski mandates, and consequently, fundamental first amendment freedoms are not adequately protected.