Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Freedom of religion (2)
- Agency fees (1)
- Animal law (1)
- Antiquities Act of 1906 (1)
- Bears Ears National Monument (1)
-
- CCPA (1)
- California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (1)
- Cell phone privacy (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- Establishment clause (1)
- Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) (1)
- Incorporation doctrine (1)
- Labor unions (1)
- Local ordinances (1)
- Pet evacuations (1)
- Public employees (1)
- Rational basis review (1)
- Right to bear arms (1)
- S.2354 (1)
- Sanctuary cities; sanctuary campuses; undocumented immigrants; (1)
- Search & seizure (1)
- Seasonal labor (1)
- Second amendment rights (1)
- States rights (1)
- Stored Communications Act (1)
- Undocumented workers (1)
- United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Victory For Labor Standards Overshadowed By Trumps Immigration Policies, Golden Gate University Law Review
A Victory For Labor Standards Overshadowed By Trumps Immigration Policies, Golden Gate University Law Review
GGU Law Review Blog
On June 22, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that deportation cannot be used as retaliation against undocumented workers who exercise their labor rights. Despite this victory, recent immigration policies discourage undocumented workers from exercising their labor rights.
The California Consumer Privacy Act Of 2018: Are Your Interests At Stake?, Golden Gate University School Of Law
The California Consumer Privacy Act Of 2018: Are Your Interests At Stake?, Golden Gate University School Of Law
GGU Law Review Blog
In recent years, the Supreme Court has recognized the downturn of consistent and reliable Establishment Clause jurisprudence. The inconsistency of opinions and the often hostile outcomes have left the Establishment Clause in “shambles”. Justices have commented that there is no other area of law in more desperate need of repair than the Establishment Clause. One reason posited for the current state of confusion is that the Establishment Clause was never intended to be incorporated. Because of this, even the Supreme Court cannot agree on a single test or even consistently apply the many tests it currently employs.
Restoring The Establishment Clause To The States; Restoring Religious Tolerance, Golden Gate University Law Review
Restoring The Establishment Clause To The States; Restoring Religious Tolerance, Golden Gate University Law Review
GGU Law Review Blog
In recent years, the Supreme Court has recognized the downturn of consistent and reliable Establishment Clause jurisprudence. The inconsistency of opinions and the often hostile outcomes have left the Establishment Clause in “shambles”. Justices have commented that there is no other area of law in more desperate need of repair than the Establishment Clause. One reason posited for the current state of confusion is that the Establishment Clause was never intended to be incorporated. Because of this, even the Supreme Court cannot agree on a single test or even consistently apply the many tests it currently employs.
The California Consumer Privacy Act Of 2018: Are Your Interests At Stake?, Katie Christensen
The California Consumer Privacy Act Of 2018: Are Your Interests At Stake?, Katie Christensen
GGU Law Review Blog
California residents and those who do business in California are advised to stay abreast of the California Consumer Privacy Act, as there may be major textual revisions – or Federal pre-emption – before the act goes into effect on January 1, 2020.
The Debate Over Bears Ears National Monument, Emilie Johnson, Nicholas Joy
The Debate Over Bears Ears National Monument, Emilie Johnson, Nicholas Joy
GGU Law Review Blog
President Trump attempts to reduce the size of Bears Ears National Monument.
Fourth Amendment Protection In The Digital Age, Daniel Sorkin
Fourth Amendment Protection In The Digital Age, Daniel Sorkin
GGU Law Review Blog
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court another opportunity to address how far Fourth Amendment protections against warrantless searches and seizures extend. Specifically, the issue before the Court was “whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell phone records revealing the locations and movement of a cell phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment.”
On appeal before the Sixth Circuit, a divided three-judge panel held that “no search occurred under the Fourth Amendment because Carpenter had no reasonable expectation of privacy in …
Second Amendment Challenges: What Level Of Constitutional Scrutiny Applies?, C M. Timpson
Second Amendment Challenges: What Level Of Constitutional Scrutiny Applies?, C M. Timpson
GGU Law Review Blog
Proponents of the Second Amendment stand firm in their belief that there should be little to no restrictions on a person’s ability to obtain and maintain ownership of a gun. Others believe there should be some limitations on the right to “keep and bear arms.” In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court upheld a person’s individual right to bear arms for lawful purposes. In Heller, the Court also refused to apply rational basis review to challenges of laws that impact a person’s enumerated rights such as the guarantee against double jeopardy, right to counsel and right to …
Mandatory Agency Dues: Beneficial Or A First Amendment Violation?, Steph Nathaniel
Mandatory Agency Dues: Beneficial Or A First Amendment Violation?, Steph Nathaniel
GGU Law Review Blog
Unions have long been recognized as a major cornerstone to American culture – they have helped ensure fair wages, hours, and benefits for American workers for over a century. However, the question has continuously come up in legal discourse of whether unions modernly maintain their importance and effectiveness as exclusive bargaining representatives. This question raises an array of issues – one of those being whether public employees should be required to pay union dues when they are not members and do not support the union.
A case recently before the Supreme Court could end laws in 22 states that requires …
Katrina To Maria: Pet Evacuation In The Eye Of The Storm, Tara Cooley
Katrina To Maria: Pet Evacuation In The Eye Of The Storm, Tara Cooley
GGU Law Review Blog
In 2006, Congress passed the Pet Evacuation and Transportation Standards (PETS) Act, a landmark act for emergency preparedness. PETS requires a community’s emergency plan account for the needs of families with companion or service animals. PETS provided protection to pets and their families during Hurricane Sandy, Harvey, Irma, and Maria. The image of evacuation has changed a lot from Katrina to Harvey. Eicher, an evacuee during Hurricane Harvey, shouted to first responders, “We have two kids with down syndrome, a pig and a three-legged dog.” The first responder’s reply: “Sounds good, (let’s) do this.” During preparation for Hurricane Irma, hotels …
Sanctuary Campuses: To Be Or Not To Be, That Is The Question, Renei Caballes
Sanctuary Campuses: To Be Or Not To Be, That Is The Question, Renei Caballes
GGU Law Review Blog
In addition to cities affirming their status as sanctuaries to undocumented immigrants, college campuses have also pressured their administrations to declare their campuses sanctuaries in order to combat the President’s attacks on the undocumented members of their student bodies. Despite this pressure, many campuses are reluctant to definitively state whether or not they will be considered a “sanctuary campus” given the potential consequences of such a declaration, namely having their vital federal funding stripped. Further, for institutions that are willing to deem themselves sanctuary campuses, it is unclear just what a sanctuary campus will look like and entail. While sanctuary …