Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Fordham Law School

SEC

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Securities Arbitration: A Clinical Experiment, Constantine N. Katsoris Jan 1998

Securities Arbitration: A Clinical Experiment, Constantine N. Katsoris

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Article discusses the use of non-attorneys in representing such clients, as well as pro se representation by such claimants. It then describes the efforts of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to ensure that such claimants have access to adequate and effective representation through the use of law school clinics. Finally, this Article raises numerous issues that must be considered before establishing such clinics, and concludes that proper planning and adjustment is necessary for a successful clinical program.


Closing A Loophole: Insider Trading In Standardized Options, Steve Thel Jan 1987

Closing A Loophole: Insider Trading In Standardized Options, Steve Thel

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This article is a Commentary on a previous Note published in the Fordham Urban Law Journal (Note, Insiders, Options and the Fiduciary Principle: A Rule 10b-5 Loophole, 16 Fordham Urb. L.J. 295 (1988)). The Note argued that the Supreme Court has expressly endorsed only one theory of insider trading liability, in Chiarella v. United States. By the simple expedient of trading options on common stock rather than the common stock itself, an insider can escape Rule 10b-5 liability under Chiarella.


Tax Shelter As A Security: The Use Of Tax Returns In A 10b-5 Action, Risa A. Levine Jan 1986

Tax Shelter As A Security: The Use Of Tax Returns In A 10b-5 Action, Risa A. Levine

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This student note examines the consequences to investors who initially invest through tax shelters, and whose investments later fail, resulting in liability. The author questions policy for treating those investments in a similar manner to other securities fraud, by looking at the history and procedure of a 10b-5 private cause of action. Tax returns can be used to evaluate the liability and penalties for SEC actions and the ensuing private actions. The author concludes that because 10b-5 actions are judicially created, they must be carefully cabined and screened for reliable indications of harm to the investor. Tax returns should be …


Standing Under Section 14(E) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934: May A Tender Offeror Sue For Injunctive Relief?, James A. Scaduto Jan 1980

Standing Under Section 14(E) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934: May A Tender Offeror Sue For Injunctive Relief?, James A. Scaduto

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Note examines certain legal issues arising out of the increasing popularity of cash tender offers as a means for gaining control of public companies. Specifically, this Note will examine The Williams Act and its protection against possible fraud committed by parties attempting to use cash tender offers to take control of a company. Next, the Note will review the U.S. Supreme Court decision Piper Aircraft, Inc. v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. to see if a tender offeror can sue for damages under section 14(e) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 if it is defrauded by another tender offeror.


The Effect Of The New Sec Rules On The Constitutionality Of State Takeover Statutes, Kathleen E. Slusser Jan 1980

The Effect Of The New Sec Rules On The Constitutionality Of State Takeover Statutes, Kathleen E. Slusser

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Note examines the constitutionality of state takeover statutes in light of the SEC's 1979 adoption of new merger rules governing tender offers. It discusses the procedural and substantive requirements of both the Williams Act and the new SEC rules, the state takeover statutes, and the preemption question that is raised by the combination of these laws. The author then argues that state takeover statutes are unconstitutional by virtue of their conflict with specific provisions of the new SEC rules.