Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Duke Law

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

2018

Articles 1 - 18 of 18

Full-Text Articles in Law

Comment On Laurence Claus, The Divided Executive, Margaret H. Lemos Jun 2018

Comment On Laurence Claus, The Divided Executive, Margaret H. Lemos

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


The “Irish Born” One American Citizenship Amendment, Kevin C. Walsh Jun 2018

The “Irish Born” One American Citizenship Amendment, Kevin C. Walsh

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


The Law And Morals Of Interpretation, Stephen E. Sachs Jun 2018

The Law And Morals Of Interpretation, Stephen E. Sachs

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Foreword Jun 2018

Foreword

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Abolishing Death, Renee Knake Jun 2018

Abolishing Death, Renee Knake

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Comments On An Amendment To Repeal The Natural Born Citizen Clause, Darrell A. H. Miller Jun 2018

Comments On An Amendment To Repeal The Natural Born Citizen Clause, Darrell A. H. Miller

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Amending The Law Of Constitutional Interpretation, Andrew Coan Jun 2018

Amending The Law Of Constitutional Interpretation, Andrew Coan

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


The Divided Executive, Laurence Claus Jun 2018

The Divided Executive, Laurence Claus

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Acknowledgments Jun 2018

Acknowledgments

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Amending The Amendment Procedures Of Article V, Jason Mazzone Jun 2018

Amending The Amendment Procedures Of Article V, Jason Mazzone

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Against Amendments, Ernest A. Young Jun 2018

Against Amendments, Ernest A. Young

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


One Way Or Another The Death Penalty Will Be Abolished, But Only After The Public No Longer Has Confidence In Its Use, James E. Coleman Jun 2018

One Way Or Another The Death Penalty Will Be Abolished, But Only After The Public No Longer Has Confidence In Its Use, James E. Coleman

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Journal Staff Jun 2018

Journal Staff

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Journal Staff Jan 2018

Journal Staff

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Loyal Denominatorism And The Fourteenth Amendment: Normative Defense And Implications, Christopher R. Green Jan 2018

Loyal Denominatorism And The Fourteenth Amendment: Normative Defense And Implications, Christopher R. Green

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


“Safe Spaces” And The Educational Benefits Of Diversity, Vinay Harpalani Jan 2018

“Safe Spaces” And The Educational Benefits Of Diversity, Vinay Harpalani

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Procedural Checks: How The Constitution (And Congress) Control The Power Of The Three Branches, Todd David Peterson Jan 2018

Procedural Checks: How The Constitution (And Congress) Control The Power Of The Three Branches, Todd David Peterson

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.


Why Deporting Immigrants For “Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude” Is Now Unconstitutional, Lindsay M. Kornegay, Evan Tsen Lee Jan 2018

Why Deporting Immigrants For “Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude” Is Now Unconstitutional, Lindsay M. Kornegay, Evan Tsen Lee

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

In the best of times, immigrants should only be deported according to the rule of law and not by the whim of executive branch officials. Now, it is imperative. Yet the statute authorizing removal of immigrants for “crimes involving moral turpitude” invites officials to base their prosecutorial choices on political or personal views. As a result, defense attorneys advising their clients on the immigration consequences of pleas have no basis for prediction. Although the Supreme Court long ago rejected the argument that the “moral turpitude” clause was void for vagueness, one of the Court’s most recent decisions now makes that …