Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antonin Scalia (1)
- Chaney v. Heckler (1)
- Circuit court in banc practices (1)
- Circuit precedent (1)
- Comparative law (1)
-
- Conflicts in precedent (1)
- Conseil constitutionnel (1)
- Conservative theory (1)
- DC Circuit (1)
- Distinguishing precedent (1)
- District of Columbia Circuit (1)
- Dronenburg v. Zech (1)
- Edmund Burke (1)
- Frank Easterbrook (1)
- French law (1)
- Henry B. Veach (1)
- In bank review (1)
- Jr. (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Limiting precedent (1)
- Mini in banc proceedings (1)
- Natural law (1)
- Ralph Winter (1)
- Richard Bork (1)
- Richard Posner (1)
- Scientific jurisprudence (1)
- Stare Decisis (1)
- Teleological (1)
- Use of precedent (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Natural Law And Natural Laws, David F. Forte
Natural Law And Natural Laws, David F. Forte
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Modern science has developed the notion of "natural laws" to describe the apparent sequential patterns of the most complex parts of the physical world. But it cannot tell us what we ought to do about arms production, or human sexuality or abortion or race, or death. Non-teleological science can no more tell us that nuclear fusion is immoral than it can tell us what is the natural purpose of the solar system. Natural Law, however, can tell us what ought to be done in light of the nature of law. If indeed the nature of law is that it is …
Constraints Of Power: The Constitutional Opinions Of Judges Scalia, Bork, Posner, Easterbrook, And Winter, James G. Wilson
Constraints Of Power: The Constitutional Opinions Of Judges Scalia, Bork, Posner, Easterbrook, And Winter, James G. Wilson
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This article completes a two-part series studying the constitutional jurisprudence of Judges Antonin Scalia, Richard Posner, Robert Bork, Frank Easterbrook, and Ralph Winter Jr., five conservative academics appointed by President Reagan to the United States Court of Appeals. Judge Scalia has recently been appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States. In a previous article, published in the last issue of the University of Miami Law Review, I evaluated these five jurists' constitutional scholarship by contrasting their views with those of Edmund Burke, the originator of political conservative theory. That article tested Burke's wariness of political abstractions and his …
The Changing Course: The Use Of Precedent In The District Of Columbia Circuit, Patricia M. Wald
The Changing Course: The Use Of Precedent In The District Of Columbia Circuit, Patricia M. Wald
Cleveland State Law Review
An article by my colleague Judge Edwards uses a series of computer runs from the court's 1983 term to make out a statistical case that our members mostly agree with each other and do not fall into predictable "conservative," “liberal," or even "moderate," voting blocs; labels that the press so dearly loves to pin on us. I agree that our votes in a large number of cases, particularly administrative law cases, do not so easily typecast us. I do, however, think that in the high visibility cases, involving controversial social or "moral" issues, our differences in judicial philosophy, on the …
Mini In Banc Proceedings: A Survey Of Circuit Practices, Steven Bennett, Christine Pembroke
Mini In Banc Proceedings: A Survey Of Circuit Practices, Steven Bennett, Christine Pembroke
Cleveland State Law Review
In banc review was originally intended to resolve conflicts in circuit precedent. Full-scale in banc proceedings, however, are cumbersome, costly and time-consuming. In determining whether to proceed with in banc review, courts appear to weigh the costs of in banc review against its potential benefits. Employing this calculus, courts often forgo in banc review in conflict cases that would otherwise receive such treatment. One solution to this problem is to reduce the cost and delay of in banc proceedings by streamlining the procedure. Recently, several federal circuit courts of appeals have adopted abbreviated forms of in banc review. The purpose …
The Law/Politics Distinction, The French Conseil Constitutionnel, And The U.S. Supreme Court, Michael H. Davis
The Law/Politics Distinction, The French Conseil Constitutionnel, And The U.S. Supreme Court, Michael H. Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
A dispute burns across the landscape of French constitutional law regarding the juridical nature of the French constitutional "Supreme Court", the Conseil constitutionnel: is it a court? Both French and American scholars have claimed that, despite superficial similarities between the U.S. Supreme Court and the French Conseil constitutionnel, the American system of judicial review "can have no counterpart in the French system", that French legal and political theory is inconstistent with an effective supreme court, that there is "no possibility" that the French and American systems could surmount this "major difference", and that the Conseil is simply not a "true …