Law Commons^™

The Court And The Private Plaintiff, Elizabeth Beske

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

Two seemingly irreconcilable story arcs have emerged from the Supreme Court over the past decade. First, the Court has definitively taken itself out of the business of creating private rights of action under statutes and the Constitution, decrying such moves as relics of an “ancient regime.” Thus, the Supreme Court has slammed the door on its own ability to craft rights of action under federal statutes and put Bivens, which recognized implied constitutional remedies, into an ever-smaller box. The Court has justified these moves as necessary to keep judges from overstepping their bounds and wading into the province of the …

“At What Cost?’: The Future Of Securities Enforcement In Climate Change Litigation, Angela Washington

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

From Advocate To Party - Defenses For Lawyers Who Find Themselves In Litigation, Richard J. Wilson

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

Attorneys, like all professionals, face civil liability when their action or inaction causes harm to a client. When an attorney fails the client, the claim most often asserted, and the claim that is typically most appropriate, is a legal malpractice claim. A legal malpractice claim is based on negligence.' Thus, the elements of a legal malpractice claim are (1) a duty, (2) a breach of that duty, (3) the breach proximately caused injury to the plaintiff, and (4) damages occurred.

Still, attorneys find themselves in a different circumstance than the average litigant. An attorney is not responsible for the client's …

Brief Of The R Street Institute As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Petitioner, Charles Duan

Amicus Briefs

It is a common but misleading premise of cases such as this one that the disappointed patent applicant has two options for judicial review: a 35 U.S.C. § 145 district court action and an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 141. The applicant also has a non-judicial option: administrative remedies within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

These administrative remedies add an important dimension to this case. The Court of Appeals adopted what it conceded was an atextual construction of § 145 expense recovery provision in order to ensure that § 145 actions were not cost-prohibitive to “small businesses and individual …

Judge Shopping In The Eastern District Of Texas, Jonas Anderson

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

Judge Rodney Gilstrap has a lot of patent cases on his docket. In fact, in 2015 there were 1,686 patent cases that were filed and assigned to Judge Gilstrap, an astronomical number for a single judge. Judge Gilstrap — one of eight federal judges who sit on the Eastern District of Texas — is so popular with patent plaintiffs that over one-fourth of all patent cases in the country are heard by him. This Article addresses the problems with allowing this judge shopping to occur. It reviews the scholarship on the topic that is almost universally opposed to judge shopping …

Same-Sex Couples - Comparative Insights On Marriage And Cohabitation, Macarena Sáez

Books

This book shows six different realities of same-sex families. They range from full recognition of same-sex marriage to full invisibility of gay and lesbian individuals and their families. The broad spectrum of experiences presented in this book share some commonalities: in all of them legal scholars and civil society are moving legal boundaries or thinking of spaces within rigid legal systems for same-sex families to function. In all of them there have been legal claims to recognize the existence of same-sex families. The difference between them lies in the response of courts. Regardless of the type of legal system, when …

Red Touches Black: The First Application Of Maker's Mark And Louboutin In The Context Of Color Trademarks, Ashley E. Green

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Testing The Limits Of Trade Law Rationality: The Gpx Case And Subsidies In Non-Market Economies, Elliot J. Feldman, John J. Burke

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Identity Crisis: Seeking A Unified Approach To Plaintiff Standing For Data Security Breaches Of Sensitive Personal Information, Miles L. Galbraith

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ftc V. Labmd: Ftc Jurisdiction Over Information Privacy Is Plausible, But How Far Can It Go, Peter S. Frechette

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Governing From The Pulpit: How The First Circuit In Aclu Of Massachusetts V. U.S. Conference Of Catholic Bishops Failed To Prevent A Government Agency From Unconstitutionally Contracting Its Duties To A Religious Institution, Anna M. Lashley

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

2012 International Trade Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit, John R. Magnus, Sheridan S. Mckinney

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

2012 Patent Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit, Robert J. Smyth, David P. Bernstein, Adam D. Brooke, Rudolph Fink Iv, Nicholas J. Kim, Janice H. Lee

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Grassroots Gay Rights: Legal Advocacy At The Local Level, Lydia E. Lavelle

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Surrogate Mothers: An Exploration Of The Empirical And The Normative, Lina Peng

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

How Many Is Any: Interpreting Sec. 2252a'S Unit Of Prosecution For Child Pornography Possession, Christina M. Copsey

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Going For Gold: The Meaning Of Commercial Activity In The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act In The Race For Buried Treasure In Sunken Shipwreck, Zhen Song

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Outfoxing Alaska Hunters: How Arbitrary And Capricious Review Of Changing Regulatory Interpretations Can More Efficiently Police Agency Discretion, Brian J. Shearer

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rabid Redux: The Second Wave Of Abusive Icsid Annulments, Paul Friedland, Paul Brumpton

American University International Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Spectrum For Child Justice In The International Human Rights Framework: From Reclaiming The Delinquent Child To Restorative Justice, Violet Odala

American University International Law Review

No abstract provided.

Seeking Justice In Lago Agrio And Beyond: An Argument For Joint Responsibility Of Host States And Foreign Investors Before The Regional Human Rights Systems, Megan S. Chapman

Human Rights Brief

No abstract provided.

Common-Sense Construction Of Unfair Claims Settlement Statutes: Restoring The Good Faith In Bad Faith, Victor Schwartz, Christopher E. Appel

American University Law Review

This Article proposes to balance the scale by providing principles for the reasonable construction of bad-faith and unfair claims settlement practices in statutes applicable to insurance. Part I examines the history and development of bad-faith law, and discusses the common structure of statutes giving rise to badfaith settlement claims. Part II presents general principles courts may apply to resolve an action alleging bad faith, and specific principles courts may apply to address common issues with many states’ statutes. Part III then evaluates the public policy involved in applying such principles to first-party claims where the insured suffers an injury and …

Should Summary Judgment Be Granted?, Bradley Scott Shannon

American University Law Review

This article discusses (and criticizes) the recent change from "shall" to "should" in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 to describe the standard by which a federal district court is to decide a "properly made and supported" motion for summary judgment. The article concludes that the text of Rule 56, which formally provided that such a motion "shall" be granted, cannot plausibly be construed as meaning "should"; that this change was not supported by those authorities cited by the Federal Civil Rules Advisory Committee; and that, as a normative matter, "should" is an inappropriate standard in this context. Federal district …

Progressive Lawyering In Politically Depressing Times, Susan Carle

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

INTRODUCTION: Susan Sturm's important work offers a ray of optimism in a contemporary political climate most people of progressive inclinations find somewhat depressing. Sturm examines new models for bringing about institutional re- form without extensive management from legislatures or courts. As Sturm recognizes, resort to litigation as a strategy for increasing gender parity in employment is not a promising option these days, for several sets of reasons. First, as Sturm has explained in an earlier pathbreaking article, judicial decrees are not well suited to addressing "second generation" problems of structural reform of institutions, such as eliminating manifestations of race and …

Roundtable With Former Directors Of The Bureau Of Economics, Jonathan Baker

Presentations

The roundtable commemorates the 100th anniversary of the FTC's predecessor agency, the Bureau of Corporations. It was sponsored by the FTC's Bureau of Economics (BE) and focused on BE history and contributions of BE and economic analysis to antitrust and consumer protection enforcement, and to research and economic knowledge and policy. BE was featured because the original functions of the Bureau of Corporations were to collect information, to conduct industry and policy research, to prepare reports at the request of the Congress and the President. The panelists for the roundtable consisted of former BE Directors and Acting Directors from the …

Conceptualizing Constitutional Litigation As Anti-Government Expression: A Speech-Centered Theory Of Court Access, Robert L. Tsai

American University Law Review

This Article proposes a speech-based right of court access. First, it finds the traditional due process approach to be analytically incoherent and of limited practical value. Second, it contends that history, constitutional structure, and theory all support conceiving of the right of access as the modern analogue to the right to petition government for redress. Third, the Article explores the ways in which the civil rights plaintiff's lawsuit tracks the behavior of the traditional dissident. Fourth, by way of a case study, the essay argues that recent restrictions - notably, a congressional limitation on the amount of fees counsel for …

Elite Privilege And Public Interest Lawyering [Comments], Susan Carle

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

In 1916, Charles Anderson Boston, one of the members of the first national Legal Redress Committee of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, spoke at the organization's board of directors meeting to endorse the use of new litigation strategies in the fight against racial segregation. The “proper presentation of the legal fight against segregation,” Boston urged, should focus on gathering “facts, not law” to demonstrate to the courts the law's “actual operation.”; Boston's emphasis on using facts to demonstrate the law's operation accorded with the NAACP's litigation strategy, which relied not only on gathering and presenting such …

Sexual Abuse Against Women In Prison, Brenda V. Smith

Project on Addressing Prison Rape - Articles

One of the by-products of the influx of women into correctional settings has been the emergence of sexual misconduct against women in prison as a major issue for corrections officials and attorneys who represent women. This article advocates for laws criminalizing sexual abuse of women inmates, as well as training to prevent such abuse.

The Theory Of Fee Regulation In Class Action Settlements , Bruce L. Hay

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.