Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Intellectual Property (4)
- Intellectual Property Law (3)
- Contract Law (2)
- Data Management (2)
- Data Visualization (2)
-
- First Amendment (2)
- Freedom of expression (2)
- Intellectual Property Contracts (2)
- National Security Law (2)
- Patent Law (2)
- Patents (2)
- Plain packaging (2)
- Privacy Law (2)
- Regulation (2)
- Research Data (2)
- TRIPS (2)
- Tobacco (2)
- Trademark (2)
- WTO (2)
- Aesthetic judgments (1)
- Appropriation art (1)
- Claim Construction (1)
- Claim drafting (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Courts (1)
- Data (1)
- Disparaging marks (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Doctrine of Equivalents (1)
- Empirical Studies (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sharing Research Data And Intellectual Property Law: A Primer, Michael Carroll
Sharing Research Data And Intellectual Property Law: A Primer, Michael Carroll
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Sharing research data by depositing it in connection with a published article or otherwise making data publicly available sometimes raises intellectual property questions in the minds of depositing researchers, their employers, their funders, and other researchers who seek to reuse research data. In this context or in the drafting of data management plans, common questions are (1) what are the legal rights in data; (2) who has these rights; and (3) how does one with these rights use them to share data in a way that permits or encourages productive downstream uses? Leaving to the side privacy and national security …
Sharing Research Data And Intellectual Property Law: A Primer, Michael W. Carroll
Sharing Research Data And Intellectual Property Law: A Primer, Michael W. Carroll
Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series
Sharing research data by depositing it in connection with a published article or otherwise making data publicly available sometimes raises intellectual property questions in the minds of depositing researchers, their employers, their funders, and other researchers who seek to reuse research data. In this context or in the drafting of data management plans, common questions are (1) what are the legal rights in data; (2) who has these rights; and (3) how does one with these rights use them to share data in a way that permits or encourages productive downstream uses? Leaving to the side privacy and national security …
Between Scylla And Charybdis: Patentability And Morality Related To Human Embryonic Stem Cells, Li Jiang
Between Scylla And Charybdis: Patentability And Morality Related To Human Embryonic Stem Cells, Li Jiang
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
My Online Me: Why Gamers Should Turn To California’S Right Of Publicity Laws In Protecting Their Online Avatars, Breanne Hoke
My Online Me: Why Gamers Should Turn To California’S Right Of Publicity Laws In Protecting Their Online Avatars, Breanne Hoke
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
The New Gtld Program Or The More Things Change The More Things Stay The Same, Jack Vidovich
The New Gtld Program Or The More Things Change The More Things Stay The Same, Jack Vidovich
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
2014 Trademark Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit, Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
2014 Trademark Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit, Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Empirical Studies Of Claim Construction, Jonas Anderson
Empirical Studies Of Claim Construction, Jonas Anderson
Working Papers
Patent claims define the scope of the patent right and hence are central to the operation of the patent system. Patent prosecutors devote substantial effort to crafting patent claims so as to maximize the scope of their right without “reading on” prior art (and thereby defeating novelty). Businesses seeking to enter a technology marketplace must be careful to avoid encroaching patent claims. Thus, when patentees enforce their rights, the interpretation of claim boundaries guides both validity and infringement analysis. Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Markman v. Westview Instruments (517 U.S. 370 (1996)), holding that “the construction of a patent, …
The Supreme Court's Tightening Of Patent Definiteness & The Impact Of Nautilus V. Biosig On The Software Patent Industry, Maliha Khan
American University Business Law Review
No abstract provided.
Registering Offense: The Prohibition Of Slurs As Trademarks, Christine Farley
Registering Offense: The Prohibition Of Slurs As Trademarks, Christine Farley
Contributions to Books
Since 1967, Pro-Football has registered six marks that include the term “redskins,” a derogatory racial epithet that refers to Native Americans. The use of disparaging marks dates back to the 19th century when brands commercialized racial stereotypes, such as Aunt Jemima. Today, offensive marks, including those that ridicule race, ethnicity, gender and religion are proliferating prompting the question of what role trademark law plays in protecting the interests of diverse communities. Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act prohibits the registration of marks that consist of matter that may disparage or bring into contempt or disrepute any person, institution, or belief. …
Applying Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Restriction, Jonas Anderson
Applying Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Restriction, Jonas Anderson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
The US Supreme Court's difficulty in promulgating a standard for patent-eligibility has not gone unnoticed in the academy. Hundreds of academic conferences, including this one, have been devoted to the topic. The goal of this Article is not to solve the seemingly intractable problem of patent-eligibility doctrine. The goal of this Article is rather more modest. Instead of normatively assessing patent-eligible subject matter doctrine, this Article seeks to identify which foundational theories of patent-eligible subject matter can most readily be applied by courts and the US Patent and Trademark Office via Section 101. In doing so, this Article categorizes the …
Court Competition For Patent Cases, Jonas Anderson
Court Competition For Patent Cases, Jonas Anderson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
The traditional academic explanation for forum shopping is simple: litigants prefer to file cases in courts that offer some substantial advantage — either legal or procedural — over all other courts. But the traditional explanation fails to account for competition for litigants among courts. This Article suggests that forum shopping in patent law is driven in part by the creation of procedural and administrative distinctions among courts that are designed to attract, or in some cases to repel, patent litigants.
This Article makes two primary contributions to the literature, one theoretical and one normative. First, it theorizes that judicial competition …
Code Of Best Practices In Fair Use For The Visual Arts, Peter Jaszi
Code Of Best Practices In Fair Use For The Visual Arts, Peter Jaszi
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
2014 Patent Law Decisions On Key Issues At The Federal Circuit, Olivia T. Luk, Palash Basu, Ryan Dooley, Charles Green, Brian E. Haan
2014 Patent Law Decisions On Key Issues At The Federal Circuit, Olivia T. Luk, Palash Basu, Ryan Dooley, Charles Green, Brian E. Haan
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Intellectual Property And Gender: Reflections On Accomplishments And Methodology, Kara W. Swanson
Intellectual Property And Gender: Reflections On Accomplishments And Methodology, Kara W. Swanson
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
No Comment: Will Cariou V. Prince Alter Copyright Judges’ Taste In Art?, Christine Haight Farley
No Comment: Will Cariou V. Prince Alter Copyright Judges’ Taste In Art?, Christine Haight Farley
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Even before Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. made transformativeness the name of the game in fair use law, judges have been in search of artistic speech in their copyright fair use determinations, especially in appropriation art cases. Judges often find themselves ascribing meaning both to the defendant’s work and the plaintiff’s work when comparing the two in order to determine whether defendant’s art is new. So while many commentators attribute appropriation artist Jeff Koons’s victory in Blanch v. Koons after a string of losses to the development in fair use law contributed by Campbell, I instead argue that it has …
Internet Freedom With Teeth, Charles Duan
Internet Freedom With Teeth, Charles Duan
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
"You make the very salient statement that we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that this is a case about teeth. Well, Markman was a case about dry cleaning. But nobody thinks of Markman as standing for anything about dry cleaning."
So went what was Chief Judge Prost's perhaps most striking question to the attorney for the International Trade Commission at oral argument in ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. International Trade Commission, which is the focus of Professor Sapna Kumar's recent article Regulating Digital Trade. Yet this is what remains so fascinating about ClearCorrect: an administrative agency decision about idiosyncratic facts …
The Federal Circuit And Ultramercial:Software And Business Method Patents Tumble Further Down The Rabbit Hole, Mark Patrick
The Federal Circuit And Ultramercial:Software And Business Method Patents Tumble Further Down The Rabbit Hole, Mark Patrick
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Restoring The Fact/Law Distinction In Patent Claim Construction, Jonas Anderson
Restoring The Fact/Law Distinction In Patent Claim Construction, Jonas Anderson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
INTRODUCTION: Two decades ago, the Supreme Court sought to promote more effective, transparent patent litigation in Markman v. Westview Instruments1 by ruling that "the construction of a patent, including terms of art within its claim, is exclusively within the province of the court."'2 In so doing, the Court removed interpretation of patent claims from the black box of jury deliberations by holding that the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial did not extend to patent claim construction. Failing to find clear historical evidence of how claim construction was handled in 179 1,' the Court turned to "the relative interpretive …
Considering Trademark And Speech Rights Through The Lens Of Regulating Tobacco, Christine Farley
Considering Trademark And Speech Rights Through The Lens Of Regulating Tobacco, Christine Farley
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Many tobacco company trademarks, such as MARLBORO, are extremely valuable. But valuable trademarks are often vulnerable both to copyists and to parodists. Tobacco trademarks face the additional vulnerability of onerous public health regulations, which can limit their appearance and use. When tobacco companies challenge these health regulations they do so on the grounds that the regulations violate their First Amendment speech rights. The law that is applied in these challenges is well developed, clear and predictable. When tobacco companies challenge unauthorized third-party uses of their marks, the speech rights involved are dealt with in a distinctly different manner. Under trademark …
Considering Trademark And Speech Rights Through The Lens Of Regulating Tobacco, Christine Haight Farley, Kavita Devaney
Considering Trademark And Speech Rights Through The Lens Of Regulating Tobacco, Christine Haight Farley, Kavita Devaney
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Many tobacco company trademarks, such as MARLBORO, are extremely valuable. But valuable trademarks are often vulnerable both to copyists and to parodists. Tobacco trademarks face the additional vulnerability of onerous public health regulations, which can limit their appearance and use. When tobacco companies challenge these health regulations they do so on the grounds that the regulations violate their First Amendment speech rights. The law that is applied in these challenges is well developed, clear and predictable. When tobacco companies challenge unauthorized third-party uses of their marks, the speech rights involved are dealt with in a distinctly different manner. Under trademark …