Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (36)
- Constitutional Law (13)
- Legal History (12)
- Criminal Procedure (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
-
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Courts (3)
- Law and Gender (3)
- Military, War, and Peace (3)
- Election Law (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (2)
- Judges (2)
- National Security Law (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- American Politics (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Institution
- Publication
-
- William & Mary Law Review (11)
- Supreme Court Preview (10)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Articles (4)
- Reviews (2)
-
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (2)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications (1)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Publications (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 43
Full-Text Articles in Law
Ties In The Supreme Court Of The United States, Edward A. Hartnett
Ties In The Supreme Court Of The United States, Edward A. Hartnett
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Understanding Prophylactic Remedies Through The Looking Glass Of Bush V. Gore, Tracy A. Thomas
Understanding Prophylactic Remedies Through The Looking Glass Of Bush V. Gore, Tracy A. Thomas
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Using the context of Bush v. Gore as a vehicle for discussion, Professor Thomas examines the use and legitimacy of prophylactic remedies. In this Article, Professor Thomas advances the argument that the broad prophylactic remedy provided by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore may be viewed as contrary to the law of remedies in that it operated to negate, rather than enforce, legal rights. In particular, prophylactic remedies which are untailored and unachievable, as in Bush v. Gore, threaten the legitimacy of prophylaxis. Professor Thomas argues that the use of prophylactic remedies itself is not problematic, but concludes …
The Random Muse: Authorship And Indeterminacy, Alan R. Durham
The Random Muse: Authorship And Indeterminacy, Alan R. Durham
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Outcomes Analysis Of Scope Of Review Standards, Paul R. Verkuil
An Outcomes Analysis Of Scope Of Review Standards, Paul R. Verkuil
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Federalism-Rights Nexus: Explaining Why Senate Democrats Tolerate Rehnquist Court Decision Making But Not The Rehnquist Court, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Federal Judicial Selection As War, Part Three: The Role Of Ideology, Michael J. Gerhardt
Federal Judicial Selection As War, Part Three: The Role Of Ideology, Michael J. Gerhardt
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 10: Miscellaneous, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 10: Miscellaneous, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Lockyer V. Andrade, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Lockyer V. Andrade, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: First Amendment, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: First Amendment, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: The War On Terror, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: The War On Terror, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 2: Supreme Court Advocacy, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: Supreme Court Advocacy, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 8: Criminal Law & Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 8: Criminal Law & Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 6: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 6: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 5: Business Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 5: Business Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 9: Upcoming Issues, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 9: Upcoming Issues, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Marbury Ascendant: The Rehnquist Court And The Power To "Say What The Law Is", Timothy Zick
Marbury Ascendant: The Rehnquist Court And The Power To "Say What The Law Is", Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
After Ellerth: The Tangible Employment Action In Sexual Harassment Analysis, Susan Grover
After Ellerth: The Tangible Employment Action In Sexual Harassment Analysis, Susan Grover
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In this Article, Professor Grover argues that courts too readily allow employers to avoid vicarious liability for supervisors' unlawful sexual harassment of subordinates. The Article explores the breadth of the affirmative defense first introduced in the Supreme Court's 1998 cases of Faragher v. Boca Raton and Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth. That defense clears an employer of liability for a supervisor's unlawful sexual harassment if (a) the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior, and (b) the plaintiff employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the …
John Marshall Through The Eyes Of An Admirer: John Quincy Adams, Michael Daly Hawkins
John Marshall Through The Eyes Of An Admirer: John Quincy Adams, Michael Daly Hawkins
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And "We The People": Revisions In Need Of Revising, Martin S. Flaherty
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And "We The People": Revisions In Need Of Revising, Martin S. Flaherty
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Easing The Spring: Strict Scrutiny And Affirmative Action After The Redistricting Cases, Pamela S. Karlan
Easing The Spring: Strict Scrutiny And Affirmative Action After The Redistricting Cases, Pamela S. Karlan
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Judge For All Seasons, R. Kent Newmyer
A Judge For All Seasons, R. Kent Newmyer
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Some Alarming Aspects Of The Legacies Of Judicial Review And Of John Marshall, Stephen B. Presser
Some Alarming Aspects Of The Legacies Of Judicial Review And Of John Marshall, Stephen B. Presser
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall: Remarks Of October 6, 2000, William H. Rehnquist
John Marshall: Remarks Of October 6, 2000, William H. Rehnquist
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Use That The Future Makes Of The Past: John Marshall's Greatness And Its Lessons For Today's Supreme Court Justices, Jack M. Balkin
The Use That The Future Makes Of The Past: John Marshall's Greatness And Its Lessons For Today's Supreme Court Justices, Jack M. Balkin
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Lives Of John Marshall, Michael J. Gerhardt
The Lives Of John Marshall, Michael J. Gerhardt
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Business Of Expression: Economic Liberty, Political Factions And The Forgotten First Amendment Legacy Of Justice George Sutherland, Samuel R. Olken
The Business Of Expression: Economic Liberty, Political Factions And The Forgotten First Amendment Legacy Of Justice George Sutherland, Samuel R. Olken
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
In The Business of Expression: Economic Liberty, Political Factions And The Forgotten First Amendment Legacy of Justice George Sutherland, Samuel Olken traces the dichotomy that emerged in constitutional law in the aftermath of the Lochner era between economic liberty and freedom of expression. During the 1930s, while a deeply divided United States Supreme Court adopted a laissez faire approach to economic regulation, it viewed with great suspicion laws that restricted the manner and content of expression. During this period, Justice George Sutherland often clashed with the majority consistently insisting that state regulation of private economic rights bear a close and …
The Constitution And The New Deal, Richard D. Friedman
The Constitution And The New Deal, Richard D. Friedman
Reviews
The Supreme Court of the New Deal era continues to captivate American lawyers and historians. Constitutional jurisprudence changed rapidly during the period. Moreover, some of the most significant changes appeared - whatever the reality - to result from pressure imposed in 1937 by President Franklin Roosevelt's plan to pack the Court with Justices amenable to his programme. The structure of constitutional law that emerged within a few years of Roosevelt's death remains intact in significant respects today.
Not Because They Are Brown, But Because Of Ea*: Why The Good Guys Lost In Rice V. Cayetano, And Why They Didn't Have To Lose, Gavin Clarkson
Not Because They Are Brown, But Because Of Ea*: Why The Good Guys Lost In Rice V. Cayetano, And Why They Didn't Have To Lose, Gavin Clarkson
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Part II of this Article therefore reviews the history of Native Hawaiians in the broader context of the history of federal Indian law, focusing on the vacillating congressional policies regarding Indians and how those policies almost always treated Indian tribes as political entities rather than ethnic communities. Part III reviews and analyzes the procedural history of the Rice case and its resolution by the Supreme Court. Part IV concludes with the argument that constitutionally-permissible alternative methodologies exist for accomplishing the same objective of self-determination for Native Hawaiians
Repairing The Legacy Of Ins V. Elias-Zacarias, Shayna S. Cook
Repairing The Legacy Of Ins V. Elias-Zacarias, Shayna S. Cook
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Article examines the evolution of the nexus requirement in United States refugee law since the Elias-Zacarias decision. Part I discusses the Supreme Court's decision in Elias-Zacarias, identifying the choices the Court made among the arguments presented before it that resulted in the motive-oriented approach to nexus. This Part also delves into the Court's statement about the evidence required to demonstrate motive, concluding that the Court's treatment of the evidence before it foreshadows the confusion lower courts have demonstrated in evaluating evidence of motive. Part II looks at appellate decisions on the nexus issue since 1992, highlighting cases that …