Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Procedure (11)
- Litigation (8)
- Securities Law (6)
- Torts (4)
- Legal Remedies (2)
-
- Administrative Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Construction Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Institution
- Publication
-
- Akron Law Review (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- Northwestern University Law Review (2)
-
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Con Law Center Articles and Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law (1)
- Montana Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 29 of 29
Full-Text Articles in Law
On Regulatory Discord And Procedure, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
On Regulatory Discord And Procedure, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Scholarly Works
Businesses are increasingly global. But domestic courts’ jurisdiction remains largely provincial; both public and private regulators have overlapping, mismatched authority. Regulatory discord is readily apparent in consumer protection cases. When the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act empowered state regulators while simultaneously creating an encompassing federal regulator—the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—it further contributed to overlap between federal agencies, states, and private litigation.
Whether this regulatory magnetism is optimal in terms of fundamental goals like compensation and deterrence is a hotly debated normative and empirical question. Yet, one need not wade too far into the substantive debate to appreciate …
Constructing Issue Classes, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Constructing Issue Classes, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Scholarly Works
As government budgets shrink each year, enforcement responsibilities in products liability, consumer protection, and employment discrimination fall increasingly to private attorneys. But defendants have successfully layered new objections about noncohesive classes and unascertainable members atop legislative and judicial reforms to cripple plaintiffs’ attorneys’ chief weapon — the class action. The result? Courts deny class certification and defendants escape enforcement by highlighting the differences among those affected by their misconduct. At the other end of the regulatory spectrum lies the opposite problem. Some defendants’ actions are so egregious that hordes of public and private regulators can’t help but get involved — …
The Roberts Court And Securities Class Actions: Reaffirming Basic Principles, Eric Alan Isaacson
The Roberts Court And Securities Class Actions: Reaffirming Basic Principles, Eric Alan Isaacson
Akron Law Review
Part II of this Article presents an overview of Roberts Court decisions concerning class litigation...The Article’s primary focus, however, is on a trilogy of Roberts Court decisions concerning class certification in open-market securities fraud cases, where fraudulent statements allegedly manipulated the price of securities traded in the open market: Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton, Co. (“Halliburton I”), Amgen, Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, and Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. (“Halliburton II”)...Rather than jumping directly into a discussion of the three decisions, which have been extraordinarily good news for investors seeking to prosecute …
The Practical Approach: How The Roberts Court Has Enhanced Class Action Procedure By Strategically Carving At The Edges, Paul G. Karlsgodt, Dustin M. Dow
The Practical Approach: How The Roberts Court Has Enhanced Class Action Procedure By Strategically Carving At The Edges, Paul G. Karlsgodt, Dustin M. Dow
Akron Law Review
This Article explores the practical impacts of the Court’s class-action jurisprudence from 30,000 feet, observing that, with some notable exceptions, the Court has nibbled away at the rough edges of class-action procedure while passing on chances to dictate more drastic reform. Part II is a chronological summary of notable Roberts Court cases that have come to define its approach toward class litigation. Perhaps surprisingly, the Court eased its way to this point, neglecting to grant certiorari in any significant class-action cases for the first four years after the swearing in of Chief Justice Roberts in 2005. That changed in 2009 …
The New Class Action Federalism, Mark Moller
The New Class Action Federalism, Mark Moller
Akron Law Review
Because separation of powers is “an aspect of federalism”10—a mechanism through which federalism is protected—this idea helps connect the Court’s “happenstantial” class action federalism with constitutional principle. This Article develops this idea in three parts. Part I briefly summarizes Richard Marcus’s account of CAFA’s potential to catalyze a kind of hyper-aggressive mass tort nationalism. Part II then reviews how the Roberts Court’s stinting approach to class actions is, to the contrary, throwing a lifeline to federalism. Part III ends by showing how Bayer points to a link, so far undeveloped in the case law, between that stinting approach and the …
The Roberts Court And The End Of The Entity Theory, Andrew J. Trask
The Roberts Court And The End Of The Entity Theory, Andrew J. Trask
Akron Law Review
This Article traces the shift away from the entity theory. It begins with a discussion of the various academic treatments of the entity model, from its first formulation years ago to the more radical “trust device” theories advanced today. It then looks at the various ways in which implicitly adopting the entity model has affected various rulings in class action litigation. Finally, it discusses how the 9–0 opinions in Taylor v. Sturgell, Bayer Corp. v. Smith, and Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles (buttressed by Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent in Symczyk v. Genesis Health Co.) have made it clear that …
Employment Discrimination Class Actions After Wal-Mart V. Dukes, Michael Selmi, Sylvia Tsakos
Employment Discrimination Class Actions After Wal-Mart V. Dukes, Michael Selmi, Sylvia Tsakos
Akron Law Review
This Article explores the ramifications of Wal-Mart approximately five years after the case was decided. While five years hardly provides definitive data on how the case will be interpreted, it is possible to identify trends in the cases that have been decided to date—trends that are likely to provide insight into the future of class action claims. That future suggests that there will be fewer, and perhaps no, nationwide class actions in cases that do not involve a clear challenged practice (any such cases are likely to be disparate impact cases) and that the prospect for class certification will turn …
Front-Loading, Avoidance, And Other Features Of The Recent Supreme Court Class Action Jurisprudence, Richard D. Freer
Front-Loading, Avoidance, And Other Features Of The Recent Supreme Court Class Action Jurisprudence, Richard D. Freer
Akron Law Review
This Article discusses each of the thirteen Supreme Court decisions with the goal of drawing at least tentative conclusions for their impact on federal class practice. The thirteen decisions may be placed into five groups. Only three of the cases directly involve the general interpretation and application of Rule 23, while the other ten fall into four particular substantive areas. Reflecting these divisions, this Article proceeds in five parts. Part I discusses the three cases directly interpreting Rule 23. Part II addresses the three decisions involving securities classes brought under Rule 10b-5. Part III discusses the three decisions involving the …
Back To Class: Lessons From The Roberts Court Class Action Jurisprudence, Bernadette Bollas Genetin
Back To Class: Lessons From The Roberts Court Class Action Jurisprudence, Bernadette Bollas Genetin
Akron Law Review
This symposium issue on The Class Action After a Decade of Roberts Court Decisions provides perspectives on how the class action has fared under persistent Supreme Court scrutiny. Over the past ten years, the Roberts Court has repeatedly returned to questions concerning class action litigation...This ten-year retrospective on the Roberts Court’s class action decisions provides a timely opportunity to reflect on the Supreme Court’s institutional role in construing the Federal Rules and in creating class action policy through decisions construing Rule 23...The contributors to this symposium focus on the Roberts Court class action decisions as a whole; the Roberts Court’s …
Will Employment Discrimination Class Actions Survive?, Melissa Hart
Will Employment Discrimination Class Actions Survive?, Melissa Hart
Akron Law Review
This paper will argue that the changes wrought by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 do not in fact pose a barrier to resolution of employment discrimination claims through class litigation. The addition of compensatory and punitive damages and a jury-trial right in the Civil Rights Act of 1991 may increase the level of scrutiny and perhaps the level of judicial involvement necessary in an employment discrimination class action. But they do not render such a class action either impermissible under Rule 23 or violative of due process or Seventh Amendment jury trial rights. Courts and commentators who insist that …
Collective Justice Or Personal Gain? An Empirical Analysis Of Consumer Class Action Lawyers And Named Plaintiffs, Stephen Meili
Collective Justice Or Personal Gain? An Empirical Analysis Of Consumer Class Action Lawyers And Named Plaintiffs, Stephen Meili
Akron Law Review
Although class action lawsuits have been the subject of much scholarly research, the vast majority of that work has focused on the history and procedural aspects of class actions, narratives of particular cases, and debates surrounding their utility, cost, and the compensation of the lawyers who litigate them...This article begins to fill these significant voids. Through a series of semi-structured interviews, it examines the expectations and attitudes of plaintiffs’ lawyers and named plaintiffs in consumer protection class actions: why they filed the lawsuit, and whether their goals changed over time; the reasons for their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the result …
Reflections Of A Recovering Aggregationist, Linda S. Mullenix
Reflections Of A Recovering Aggregationist, Linda S. Mullenix
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Finding The Civil Trial's Democratic Future After Its Demise, David Marcus
Finding The Civil Trial's Democratic Future After Its Demise, David Marcus
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Defining The Word: "Maintain"; Context Counts, Jack Friedenthal
Defining The Word: "Maintain"; Context Counts, Jack Friedenthal
Akron Law Review
To understand what a word means, especially one such as “maintain” that has multiple formal definitions, one must consider the background and purpose for which it is utilized.
A Corporation's Securities Litigation Gambit: Fee-Shifting Provisions That Defend Against Fraud-On-The-Market, Steven W. Lippman
A Corporation's Securities Litigation Gambit: Fee-Shifting Provisions That Defend Against Fraud-On-The-Market, Steven W. Lippman
University of Richmond Law Review
Part I discusses the current landscape of securities class action litigation. It explains how and why the suits are initiated and dis cusses the outcome of Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. (HalliburtonII).19 PartII discusses the framework for the proposition of this comment. It provides a brief history of significant cas es and incorporates several recent cases that have opened the door to the possibility of implementing fee-shifting clauses. It concludes with a comparison to other contractual provisions cur rently being implemented by corporations and also analyzes fee shifting provisions under federal preemption. Part III explains why implementing …
Saving Charitable Settlements, Christine P. Bartholomew
Saving Charitable Settlements, Christine P. Bartholomew
Fordham Law Review
This Article defies the conventional wisdom that all charitable distributions from a class action settlement fund are types of cy pres. Instead, it proposes a radical delineation between “cy pres remainders” (meaning settlement funds left over after individual monetary distributions) and “charitable settlements” (meaning money initially distributed to charities as part of class action settlements). While both have cy pres roots, these two settlement structures have been conflated, jeopardizing the potential utility of charitable settlements. After articulating more precise nomenclature for these distinct distribution methods, this Article justifies why we must preserve charitable settlements. This defense is particularly …
The Breaking Of A Wave: Jacobsen V. Allstate Ins. Co. And Class Certification, Lucas Hamilton
The Breaking Of A Wave: Jacobsen V. Allstate Ins. Co. And Class Certification, Lucas Hamilton
Montana Law Review
No abstract provided.
International Mass Tort Litigation: Forum Non Conveniens And The Adequate Alternative Forum In Light Of The Bhopal Disaster, Stephen L. Cummings
International Mass Tort Litigation: Forum Non Conveniens And The Adequate Alternative Forum In Light Of The Bhopal Disaster, Stephen L. Cummings
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Immigration - Due Process - The Availability Of Constitutional Safeguards To Detained Cuban Aliens, Garcia-Mir V. Meese, 788 F.2d 1446 (11th Cir. 1986), Cert. Denied, 107 S. Ct. 289 (1986)., Elizabeth G. Marlowe
Immigration - Due Process - The Availability Of Constitutional Safeguards To Detained Cuban Aliens, Garcia-Mir V. Meese, 788 F.2d 1446 (11th Cir. 1986), Cert. Denied, 107 S. Ct. 289 (1986)., Elizabeth G. Marlowe
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Jury Certification Of Federal Securities Fraud Class Actions, Thomas Kayes
Jury Certification Of Federal Securities Fraud Class Actions, Thomas Kayes
Northwestern University Law Review
The rough equivalence of certification and ultimate outcome is class action dogma. If certification is granted, then the plaintiff “wins” by settlement because the risk of incurring class-wide liability by going to trial is too great. If certification is denied, the defendant “wins” because the case may not be worth litigating without the possibility of a class-wide recovery. This Note is about where the dogma is wrong. There are now cases where a denial of certification, just like a grant, presents to the defendant the risk of incurring class-wide liability at trial. This is because those cases are capable of …
Better Bounty Hunting: How The Sec's New Whistleblower Program Changes The Securities Fraud Class Action Debate, Amanda M. Rose
Better Bounty Hunting: How The Sec's New Whistleblower Program Changes The Securities Fraud Class Action Debate, Amanda M. Rose
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Back To Class: Lessons From The Roberts Court Class Action Jurisprudence, Bernadette Bollas Genetin
Back To Class: Lessons From The Roberts Court Class Action Jurisprudence, Bernadette Bollas Genetin
Con Law Center Articles and Publications
This symposium issue on The Class Action After a Decade of Roberts Court Decisions provides perspectives on how the class action has fared under persistent Supreme Court scrutiny. Over the past ten years, the Roberts Court has repeatedly returned to questions concerning class action litigation...This ten-year retrospective on the Roberts Court’s class action decisions provides a timely opportunity to reflect on the Supreme Court’s institutional role in construing the Federal Rules and in creating class action policy through decisions construing Rule 23...The contributors to this symposium focus on the Roberts Court class action decisions as a whole; the Roberts Court’s …
A Practitioner's Guide To Defending "Natural" Food Labeling Litigation, Lauren E. Handel
A Practitioner's Guide To Defending "Natural" Food Labeling Litigation, Lauren E. Handel
Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law
No abstract provided.
The End Of Class Actions?, Brian T. Fitzpatrick
The End Of Class Actions?, Brian T. Fitzpatrick
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In this Article, I give a status report on the life expectancy of class action litigation following the Supreme Court's decisions in Concepcion and American Express. These decisions permitted corporations to opt out of class action liability through the use of arbitration clauses, and many commentators, myself included, predicted that they would eventually lead us down a road where class actions against businesses would be all but eliminated. Enough time has now passed to make an assessment of whether these predictions are coming to fruition. I find that, although there is not yet solid evidence that businesses have flocked to …
The Sydney Tar Ponds Case: Shutting The Door On Environmental Class Action Suits In Nova Scotia?, Meinhard Doelle
The Sydney Tar Ponds Case: Shutting The Door On Environmental Class Action Suits In Nova Scotia?, Meinhard Doelle
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The case comment provides an assessment of the recent class action case in Nova Scotia regarding the notorious Sydney Tar Ponds contaminated site. The comment considers the implications for class actions and for environmental tort law.
Is The Price Right? An Empirical Study Of Fee-Setting In Securities Class Actions, Michael A. Perino, Lynn A. Baker, Charles Silver
Is The Price Right? An Empirical Study Of Fee-Setting In Securities Class Actions, Michael A. Perino, Lynn A. Baker, Charles Silver
Faculty Publications
Every year, fee awards enable millions of people to obtain access to justice and strengthen the deterrent effect of the law by motivating lawyers to handle class actions. But little research exists on why judges award the amounts they do or whether they size fee awards correctly. The process remains a black box. Through a detailed study of 431 securities class actions that settled in federal district courts from 2007 through 2012, this Article presents the first empirical study to peer inside that black box. In contrast to prior analyses, this study relies on the actual court filings in each …
The Economics Of Class Actions And Class Action Waivers, Keith N. Hylton
The Economics Of Class Actions And Class Action Waivers, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
Class action litigation has generated a series of recent Supreme Court decisions imposing greater federal court supervision over the prosecution of collective injury claims. This group of cases raises the question whether class action waivers should be permitted on policy grounds. I examine the economics of class actions and waivers in this paper. I distinguish between the standard one-on-one litigation environment and the class action environment. In the standard environment, waivers between informed agents enhance society's welfare. In the class action environment, in contrast, not all waivers are likely to enhance society's welfare.
Halliburton Ii: It All Depends On What Defendants Need To Show To Establish No Impact On Price, Merritt B. Fox
Halliburton Ii: It All Depends On What Defendants Need To Show To Establish No Impact On Price, Merritt B. Fox
Faculty Scholarship
Rule 1Ob-5 private damages actions cannot proceed on a class basis unless the plaintiffs are entitled to the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance. In Halliburton II, the Supreme Court provides defendants with an opportunity, before class certification, to rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption through evidece that the misstatement had no effect on the issuer's share price. It left unspecified, however, the standard by which the sufficiency of this evidence should be judged.
This Article explores the two most plausible approaches to setting this standard. One approach would be to impose the same statistical burden on defendants seeking to show there was …
"Loser Pays" And Federal Preemption, John C. Coffee Jr.
"Loser Pays" And Federal Preemption, John C. Coffee Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
Delaware and the federal courts have been on a collision course since 2014 when the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the facial validity of a corporate bylaw that shifted the corporation’s (and all defendants’) legal expenses to a losing plaintiff. That 2014 decision, ATP Tour, Inc. v. Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A. 3d 554 (Del. 2014), quickly led a number of public corporations to adopt similar “loser pays” bylaws and charter provisions, all of which are one-sided provisions (that is, only the plaintiff may be held liable) and most shift the fees against the plaintiff even if it wins (unless …