Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (52)
- Criminal Procedure (24)
- Criminal Law (21)
- Fourteenth Amendment (17)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14)
-
- Courts (11)
- Immigration Law (9)
- Administrative Law (7)
- Education Law (6)
- Evidence (6)
- Legal History (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- First Amendment (5)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- Litigation (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Consumer Protection Law (4)
- Disability Law (4)
- Family Law (4)
- Judges (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Labor and Employment Law (4)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (4)
- Military, War, and Peace (4)
- Banking and Finance Law (3)
- Conflict of Laws (3)
- Juvenile Law (3)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (25)
- Selected Works (13)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (6)
- SelectedWorks (5)
- Columbia Law School (3)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- DePaul University (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Nova Southeastern University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of South Carolina (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Western New England University School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (25)
- Faculty Scholarship (10)
- University of Massachusetts Law Review (6)
- Adam Lamparello (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
-
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Catholic University Law Review (2)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (2)
- Peter A. Holland (2)
- Sheri Lynn Johnson (2)
- Articles (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- College of Law Faculty (1)
- Darren L Hutchinson (1)
- E. Lea Johnston (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Fatma E Marouf (1)
- Fatma Marouf (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- James J. Kelly Jr. (1)
- Jill Wieber Lens (1)
- John H. Blume (1)
- Lee Kovarsky (1)
- Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky (1)
- Mark C. Weber (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 88
Full-Text Articles in Law
Supreme Court, New York County, Robinson V. Finkel, Denise Shanley
Supreme Court, New York County, Robinson V. Finkel, Denise Shanley
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, People V. Morin, Lauren Tan
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, People V. Morin, Lauren Tan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Broome County, In Re United Health Services Hospitals, Kristen Kelekian
Supreme Court, Broome County, In Re United Health Services Hospitals, Kristen Kelekian
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. Henriquez, Nicholas Melillo
Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. Henriquez, Nicholas Melillo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, Third Department, Encarnacion V. Goord, Kristen Kelekian
Appellate Division, Third Department, Encarnacion V. Goord, Kristen Kelekian
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Road From Nowhere? Punitive Damage Ratios After Bmw V. Gore And State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. V. Campbell, Andrew C.W. Lund
The Road From Nowhere? Punitive Damage Ratios After Bmw V. Gore And State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. V. Campbell, Andrew C.W. Lund
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Detentions Without Due Process Of Law Following September 11th, Erwin Chemerinsky
Detentions Without Due Process Of Law Following September 11th, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Confessions, Criminals, And Community, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Confessions, Criminals, And Community, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Sheri Lynn Johnson
No abstract provided.
Cross-Racial Identification Errors In Criminal Cases, Sheri Johnson
Cross-Racial Identification Errors In Criminal Cases, Sheri Johnson
Sheri Lynn Johnson
No abstract provided.
Freedom From Incarceration: Why Is This Right Different From All Other Rights?, Sherry F. Colb
Freedom From Incarceration: Why Is This Right Different From All Other Rights?, Sherry F. Colb
Sherry Colb
American constitutional jurisprudence has long accepted the notion that the exercise of certain rights can only be restricted by the government if the restriction satisfies strict scrutiny. The Supreme Court has identified such rights as fundamental often by relying on an expansive interpretation of the word "liberty" in the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. In this Article, Professor Colb argues that the Supreme Court has failed to recognize the right to physical liberty itself as a fundamental right. She demonstrates that at present conduct that is not itself constitutionally protected may serve as the basis for imprisonment even …
Is It Admissible?: Tips For Criminal Defense Attorneys On Assessing The Admissibility Of A Criminal Defendant's Statements, Part Two, John H. Blume, Emily C. Paavola
Is It Admissible?: Tips For Criminal Defense Attorneys On Assessing The Admissibility Of A Criminal Defendant's Statements, Part Two, John H. Blume, Emily C. Paavola
John H. Blume
Part One of this article addressed the Fifth Amendment issues to be considered when analyzing the admissibility of a criminal defendant's out-of-court statements. Part Two discusses the Sixth Amendment, the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause and impeachment issues.
Supermax’S Kryptonite? Wilkinson V. Austin: The Due Process Challenge To Ohio’S Super-Maximum Security Prison, Adam Miller
Supermax’S Kryptonite? Wilkinson V. Austin: The Due Process Challenge To Ohio’S Super-Maximum Security Prison, Adam Miller
University of Massachusetts Law Review
This note discusses the Supreme Court’s holding in Wilkinson that OSP’s system for inmate placement in its Supermax facility does not violate the Equal Protection Clause. Part II will summarize OSP’s purpose and condition, and will focus on Ohio’s New Policy regarding inmate placement. Part III will examine Supreme Court precedent and the Court’s conclusions of law in determining whether inmates have a protected liberty interest in avoiding assignment to OSP and the due process implications of the inmate selection process to OSP. Part IV will question the Supreme Court’s disregard of the adverse mental effects in inmates subjected to …
2007 National Lawyer’S Convention The Federalist Society And Its Federalism And Separation Of Powers Practice Groups Present A Panel Debate On Federalism: Religion, Early America And The Fourteenth Amendment, John Eastman, Marci Hamilton, William H. Pryor Jr.
2007 National Lawyer’S Convention The Federalist Society And Its Federalism And Separation Of Powers Practice Groups Present A Panel Debate On Federalism: Religion, Early America And The Fourteenth Amendment, John Eastman, Marci Hamilton, William H. Pryor Jr.
University of Massachusetts Law Review
Transcript of the Federalist Society and its Federalism and Separation of Powers Practice Groups panel debate at the 2007 National Lawyers Convention including panelists Dean John Eastman of Chapman University School of Law, Professor Marci Hamilton of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, and moderated by Hon. William H. Pryor Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
State Sovereign Immunity And Intellectual Property: An Evaluation Of The Trademark Remedy Clarification Act’S Attempt To Subject States To Suit In Federal Courts For Trademark Infringements Under The Lanham Act, Jennifer L. Fessler
University of Massachusetts Law Review
There are two things that can be learned from this paper. First, the analytical framework developed by the Court in City of Boerne is a stringent test that has considerably narrowed Congress’s ability to abrogate state’s Eleventh Amendment immunity through legislation. Second, only half of the battle was won when Congress enacted the Trademark Remedy Clarification Act. Although it met the new requirements the Court placed on legislative efforts in Atascadero, it is not able to meet the requirements that were later set forth in Seminole Tribe. The Rehnquist Court’s holdings indicate the Court’s active pursuit of state’s …
Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation In The Public Employment Context, Erwin Chemerinsky
Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation In The Public Employment Context, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Inflicted Wounds: How Military Regulations Prejudice Service Members, Kyndra Miller Rotunda, Ari Freilich
Self-Inflicted Wounds: How Military Regulations Prejudice Service Members, Kyndra Miller Rotunda, Ari Freilich
University of Massachusetts Law Review
This Article discusses two important facets of Military Regulation and veterans law. First, this Article explores how the Uniform Code of Military Justice treats veterans accused of committing self-injury. Thus, there is a prohibition on , including criminal prosecution of, attempted suicide, which this Article argues exacerbates the issues which many of our brave servicemen and women face upon returning home from combat, often carrying the burden of mental disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder. Second, this Article delves into Air Force Regulations, which prohibits termination, without cause, once an officer reaches the rank of Major and has served at …
How Not To Criminalize Cyberbullying, Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Andrea Garcia
How Not To Criminalize Cyberbullying, Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Andrea Garcia
Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky
This essay provides a sustained constitutional critique of the growing body of laws criminalizing cyberbullying. These laws typically proceed by either modernizing existing harassment and stalking laws or crafting new criminal offenses. Both paths are beset with First Amendment perils, which this essay illustrates through 'case studies' of selected legislative efforts. Though sympathetic to the aims of these new laws, this essay contends that reflexive criminalization in response to tragic cyberbullying incidents has led law-makers to conflate cyberbullying as a social problem with cyberbullying as a criminal problem, creating pernicious consequences. The legislative zeal to eradicate cyberbullying potentially produces disproportionate …
Stuck Between A Lump Of Coal And A Hard Place: The Mine Safety And Health Administration's Struggle With Due Process And America's Coal Industry, Patrick R. Baker
Stuck Between A Lump Of Coal And A Hard Place: The Mine Safety And Health Administration's Struggle With Due Process And America's Coal Industry, Patrick R. Baker
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, Courtroom Television Network, Llc V. New York, Courtney Weinberger
Court Of Appeals Of New York, Courtroom Television Network, Llc V. New York, Courtney Weinberger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, Second Department, Langan V. St. Vincent's Hospital Of New York, Christin Harris
Appellate Division, Second Department, Langan V. St. Vincent's Hospital Of New York, Christin Harris
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Vasquez, Jessica Goodwin
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Vasquez, Jessica Goodwin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Tompkins County, Seymour V. Holcomb, Jessica Goodwin
Supreme Court, Tompkins County, Seymour V. Holcomb, Jessica Goodwin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People Ex Rel. Furde V. New York City Dep't Of Correction, Adam D'Antonio
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People Ex Rel. Furde V. New York City Dep't Of Correction, Adam D'Antonio
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, Third Department, People V. Rivette, Michele Kligman
Appellate Division, Third Department, People V. Rivette, Michele Kligman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, Harner V. County Of Tioga, Gerald C. Waters Jr.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, Harner V. County Of Tioga, Gerald C. Waters Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
District Court, Nassau County, People V. Yaghoubi, David Schoenhaar
District Court, Nassau County, People V. Yaghoubi, David Schoenhaar
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disparity In Police Procedures For Non-English Speaking Dwi Suspects: Constitutional Protections For Non-English Speaking Criminal Defendants Falling Second To Governmental Interests, Daniela Giordano
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Challenge Of Seeing Justice Done In Removal Proceedings, Jason A. Cade
The Challenge Of Seeing Justice Done In Removal Proceedings, Jason A. Cade
Scholarly Works
Prosecutorial discretion is a critical part of the administration of immigration law. This Article considers the work and responsibilities of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) trial attorneys, who thus far have not attracted significant scholarly attention, despite playing a large role in the ground-level implementation of immigration law and policy. The Article makes three main contributions. First, I consider whether ICE attorneys have a duty to help ensure that the removal system achieves justice, rather than indiscriminately seek removal in every case and by any means necessary. As I demonstrate, trial attorneys have concrete obligations derived from statutory provisions, …
The Challenge Of Seeing Justice Done In Removal Proceedings, Jason A. Cade
The Challenge Of Seeing Justice Done In Removal Proceedings, Jason A. Cade
Scholarly Works
Prosecutorial discretion is a critical part of the administration of immigration law. This Article considers the work and responsibilities of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) trial attorneys, who thus far have not attracted significant scholarly attention, despite playing a large role in the ground-level implementation of immigration law and policy. The Article makes three main contributions. First, I consider whether ICE attorneys have a duty to help ensure that the removal system achieves justice, rather than indiscriminately seek removal in every case and by any means necessary. As I demonstrate, trial attorneys have concrete obligations derived from statutory provisions, …