Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- American Politics (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Curriculum and Instruction (1)
- Education (1)
-
- Education Law (1)
- Education Policy (1)
- Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Other Education (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Politics Of Physical Education Reform, Ari Zyskind
The Politics Of Physical Education Reform, Ari Zyskind
CMC Senior Theses
The purpose of the paper is to determine why today's youth are so physically inactive by examining the role and efforts of physical education, and the state and federal governments responsibility in supporting these programs, in fighting today's obesity epidemic by creating generations of healthy and physically active children. Research led to the determination that states have failed to maintain and improve physical education resulting in a physically inactive youth. Therefore, the nation should look to federal legislation to support state-led physical education, which this paper found to be constitutional if the enactments followed the provisions established in South Dakota …
The Individual Mandate, Commerce Clause, And Supreme Court: Predicting The Court's Ruling In Hhs V. Florida, Nicholas Medling
The Individual Mandate, Commerce Clause, And Supreme Court: Predicting The Court's Ruling In Hhs V. Florida, Nicholas Medling
CMC Senior Theses
An analysis of the evolution of the Commerce Clause, the Justices on the Supreme Court, and the arguments presented in this case indicate that the minimum coverage provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will be struck down. Although the Court will likely be split 5 to 4 along ideological lines, each of the justices will have a unique rationale behind their decision. Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia, and Justice Kennedy were heavily targeted by both parties’ oral and written arguments because there was speculation that any one of these traditionally conservative justices could be the fifth vote …