Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal Circuit (2)
- Markman (2)
- AWH Corp. (1)
- Abuse of rights (1)
- American Chemical Society (1)
-
- Amgen (1)
- Amgen Inc. (1)
- Anitec Printing Plates (1)
- Antidumping (1)
- Archer (1)
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission (1)
- Baffles (1)
- Barclay v. United States (1)
- Bay View (1)
- Becton (1)
- Bilski v. Kappos (1)
- Bureaucratization and Balkanization (1)
- Butler v. Michigan (1)
- CAFC (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Certiorari (1)
- Citizen suits (Civil procedure) -- India (1)
- Claim (1)
- Claims (1)
- Clevenger (1)
- Conceptronic (1)
- Contract (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Corbin (1)
- Cotropia (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Let's Talk About Text: Contracts, Claims, And Judicial Philosophy At The Federal Circuit, Andrew T. Langford
Let's Talk About Text: Contracts, Claims, And Judicial Philosophy At The Federal Circuit, Andrew T. Langford
IP Theory
No abstract provided.
Newman, J., Dissenting: Another Vision Of The Federal Circuit, Blake R. Hartz
Newman, J., Dissenting: Another Vision Of The Federal Circuit, Blake R. Hartz
IP Theory
No abstract provided.
Public Interest Litigation In India As A Paradigm For Developing Nations, Zachary Holladay
Public Interest Litigation In India As A Paradigm For Developing Nations, Zachary Holladay
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
Public interest litigation (PIL) in India can serve as a vehicle for creating and enforcing rights and is critical to the sustenance of democracy. PIL in India can address the needs of its citizens when legislative inertia afflicts the Indian National Congress. This Note discusses how PIL in India can serve as a model for other developing nations struggling with legislative inertia and can provide recourse to marginalized and disadvantaged communities. Furthermore, while PIL obscures the traditional boundaries of power in a liberal democratic polity, democracy is in fact strengthened by the expansion of standing to include any citizen who …
Of Burning Houses And Roasting Pigs: Why Butler V. Michigan Remains A Key Free Speech Victory More Than A Half-Century Later, Clay Calvert
Of Burning Houses And Roasting Pigs: Why Butler V. Michigan Remains A Key Free Speech Victory More Than A Half-Century Later, Clay Calvert
Federal Communications Law Journal
More than fifty years after the U.S. Supreme Court rendered its unanimous decision in Butler v. Michigan, the case remains a pivotal-if unheralded and perhaps underappreciated-victory for freedom of speech. This Article analyzes the Butler principle and demonstrates how courts repeatedly apply it across different media platforms and in a myriad of factually distinct contexts, ranging from prohibitions on the sale of sex toys to bans on beer bottles with offensive labels. The Article initially provides an in-depth look at Butler, drawing on literary scholarship, historical newspaper articles from the time of the case, and other sources. It then illustrates …