Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 20 of 20

Full-Text Articles in Law

Mandatory Arrest For Misdemeanor Domestic Violence: Is Alaska’S Arrest Statute Constitutional?, Paul A. Clark Dec 2010

Mandatory Arrest For Misdemeanor Domestic Violence: Is Alaska’S Arrest Statute Constitutional?, Paul A. Clark

Alaska Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rodriguez V. Hayes: Government Accountability For Immigrants In Prolonged Detention, Otis Carl Landerholm Oct 2010

Rodriguez V. Hayes: Government Accountability For Immigrants In Prolonged Detention, Otis Carl Landerholm

Golden Gate University Law Review

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) chooses to keep many immigrants incarcerated while they await the results of their hearings before immigration judges, appeals to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), or second appeals to the federal courts of appeals. Starting with Zadvydas v. Davis in 2001, federal courts have been facing the question of whether such lengthy detentions are permissible under either the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) or the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court in Zadvydas held that indefinite detention “would raise serious constitutional concerns” and decided to construe the prolonged-detention statute at issue “to contain …


Witt V. Department Of The Air Force Subjects "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" To Intermediate Scrutiny, Jessica L. Beeler Oct 2010

Witt V. Department Of The Air Force Subjects "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" To Intermediate Scrutiny, Jessica L. Beeler

Golden Gate University Law Review

"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" ("DADT") refers to the statutory U.S. policy of excluding openly homosexual individuals from serving in the military. It prohibits members of the armed forces from engaging in homosexual acts, stating that they are gay or bisexual, or openly marrying a person of the same sex. Although the constitutionality of DADT has been upheld several times in federal Court, these cases preceded the United States Supreme Court's holding in Lawrence v. Texas. In Lawrence, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas antisodomy statute as unconstitutional and declared that the private homosexual conduct targeted by the law was …


Designating Terrorist Organizations: Due Process Overdue, Micah Wyatt Oct 2010

Designating Terrorist Organizations: Due Process Overdue, Micah Wyatt

Golden Gate University Law Review

This Comment argues that §1189 is unconstitutional because it deprives accused terrorist organizations due process under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Section I will provide an explanation of §1189 and §2339B and their effect on both an organization and its supporters. Section II will provide a brief overview of the Due Process Clause in the context of administrative proceedings. Section III will show how §1189 deprives organizations due process under the Fifth Amendment because the statute does not include the most fundamental requirements of procedural due process. Section III(A) will address the initial question of whether organizations are …


Parental Due Process: Fields V. Palmdale School District, Roxana M. Smith Oct 2010

Parental Due Process: Fields V. Palmdale School District, Roxana M. Smith

Golden Gate University Law Review

The Ninth Circuit reaffirmed in Fields v. Palmdale School District that the constitutional "due process right of parents to make decisions regarding their children's education does not" authorize "individual parents to enjoin school boards from providing information" deemed appropriate in the performance of their educational function. The court further held that the parental right of privacy over the upbringing of children does not entitle parents to prohibit public schools from providing curricula about sex which the schools' boards deem educationally appropriate.


An Unreasonable Online Search: How A Sheriffs Webcams Strengthened Fourth Amendment Privacy Rights Of Pretrial Detainees, Ian Wood Oct 2010

An Unreasonable Online Search: How A Sheriffs Webcams Strengthened Fourth Amendment Privacy Rights Of Pretrial Detainees, Ian Wood

Golden Gate University Law Review

This Note will discuss how courts approach pretrial detainees' claims of punishment, exploring both Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claims and privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment. It will go on to discuss Demery's implications for Fourth Amendment privacy rights of pretrial detainees. Part I explores the protections pretrial detainees are afforded under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause." Part l.A discusses the general differences between pretrial detainees and convicted prisoners. Part I.B considers two Supreme Court cases - Bell v. Wolfish and Block v. Rutherford - that address the standards used in evaluating punishment claims in a pretrial detention context …


The Right To Migrate As A Human Right: The Current Argentine Immigration Law, Barbara Hines Oct 2010

The Right To Migrate As A Human Right: The Current Argentine Immigration Law, Barbara Hines

Cornell International Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Traditions In Conflict: The Internationalization Of Confrontation, Kweku Vanderpuye Oct 2010

Traditions In Conflict: The Internationalization Of Confrontation, Kweku Vanderpuye

Cornell International Law Journal

This article considers international norms concerning the right to adversarial confrontation in positing a normative analytical standard of admissibility with respect to the "right to examine" guaranteed under Article 67(1)(e) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). It considers the notion of confrontation in the context of both the Continental European tradition, as well as the Anglo-American Common Law conception of the right, focusing on U.S. constitutional doctrine and relatively recent developments in English jurisprudence. It also surveys the scope of the right to examine as defined by the U.N. Human Rights Committee relative to the International …


Unequal Treatment Of United States Citizens: Eroding The Constitutional Safeguards, Irma Alicia Cabrera Ramirez Sep 2010

Unequal Treatment Of United States Citizens: Eroding The Constitutional Safeguards, Irma Alicia Cabrera Ramirez

Golden Gate University Law Review

This comment examines the unequal treatment of United States citizens who are labeled enemy combatants by looking at the factual and procedural background of Padilla, Hamdi and Lindh. Next, this comment examines the origins of the label enemy combatant and the constitutional safeguards afforded to criminal defendants in similar situations as Padilla, Hamdi,and Lindh. The terrorist acts Padilla, Hamdi, and Lindh are accused of involve international laws. Therefore, this comment will examine the Geneva Conventions as a means to understand humanitarian protections that may cover Padilla and Hamdi. Finally, this comment will provide recommendations for some of the issues raised.


How Far Can A State Go To Protect A Fetus? The Rebecca Comeau Story And The Case For Requiring Massachusetts To Follow The U.S. Constitution, Hedy R. Bower Sep 2010

How Far Can A State Go To Protect A Fetus? The Rebecca Comeau Story And The Case For Requiring Massachusetts To Follow The U.S. Constitution, Hedy R. Bower

Golden Gate University Law Review

This comment will explore the question of whether a state can take a pregnant woman into custody and subject her to prenatal care despite her religious beliefs that prohibit her from seeking medical care. Part II of this comment explains the historical development of a woman's fundamental right to privacy in making decisions concerning her pregnancy. Part II also discusses the limited contexts in which a fetus has rights, a person's right to free exercise of religion, and a person's freedom to refuse medical care. Part III addresses the legal procedures by which a state may confine a person against …


Criminal Procedure - Spain V. Rushen: Shackles Or Show Time? A Defendant's Right To See And Be Seen, Randall E. Tuskowski Sep 2010

Criminal Procedure - Spain V. Rushen: Shackles Or Show Time? A Defendant's Right To See And Be Seen, Randall E. Tuskowski

Golden Gate University Law Review

No abstract provided.


Criminal Law And Procedure, Veronica A. Franz Gundred, Richard A. Nebb Sep 2010

Criminal Law And Procedure, Veronica A. Franz Gundred, Richard A. Nebb

Golden Gate University Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fish Or Fowl? The Nature Of Wto Dispute Resolution Under Trips, Anne Hiaring Aug 2010

Fish Or Fowl? The Nature Of Wto Dispute Resolution Under Trips, Anne Hiaring

Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law

This note discusses the procedure of dispute resolution in the World Trade Organization (WTO). The note goes on to discuss WTO disputes involving intellectual property to date and the possible impacts of the WTO dispute resolution procedures on the determination of substantive issues of intellectual property law, using dispute WS 160 involving the Fairness in Music Licensing Act, as an example. The note concludes that the same concerns about lack of due process and inability of amici to appear in the proceedings that cause concern in the environmental field are also causes of concern with respect to intellectual property rights …


Transcendent Homosexuals And Dangerous Sex Offenders: Sexual Harm And Freedom In The Judicial Imaginary, Joseph J. Fischel May 2010

Transcendent Homosexuals And Dangerous Sex Offenders: Sexual Harm And Freedom In The Judicial Imaginary, Joseph J. Fischel

Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


A Diversion Of Attention? Immigration Courts And The Adjudication Of Fourth And Fifth Amendment Rights, Jennifer M. Chacón May 2010

A Diversion Of Attention? Immigration Courts And The Adjudication Of Fourth And Fifth Amendment Rights, Jennifer M. Chacón

Duke Law Journal

Because of fundamental changes in the nature of immigration enforcement over the past decade, an increasing number of interactions between law enforcement agents and noncitizens in the United States are ultimately adjudicated not in criminal courts, but in immigration courts. Unfortunately, unlike the state and federal courts that have long performed an oversight function with regard to police activity, immigration courts were not designed to police the police. As a result, there are inadequate mechanisms in place to address many of the rights violations that are occurring in the context of immigration enforcement. This Article explores the procedural deficiencies of …


The Constitutionality Of Iowa's Sex Offender Residency Restriction, Jacob Salsburg Apr 2010

The Constitutionality Of Iowa's Sex Offender Residency Restriction, Jacob Salsburg

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Corporal Punishment In The Public Schools: An Analysis Of Federal Constitutional Claims, Courtney Mitchell Apr 2010

Corporal Punishment In The Public Schools: An Analysis Of Federal Constitutional Claims, Courtney Mitchell

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.


Civilizing Criminal Sanctions - A Practical Analysis Of Civil Asset Forfeiture Under The West Virginia Contraband Forfeiture Act, Joseph Cramer Apr 2010

Civilizing Criminal Sanctions - A Practical Analysis Of Civil Asset Forfeiture Under The West Virginia Contraband Forfeiture Act, Joseph Cramer

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Future Children As Property, Carter Dillard Jan 2010

Future Children As Property, Carter Dillard

Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


“Immutability” And Stigma: Towards A More Progressive Equal Protection Rights Discourse, M. Katherine Baird Darmer Jan 2010

“Immutability” And Stigma: Towards A More Progressive Equal Protection Rights Discourse, M. Katherine Baird Darmer

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.