Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
In Defense Of Regulatory Peer Review, James Salzman, J.B. Ruhl
In Defense Of Regulatory Peer Review, James Salzman, J.B. Ruhl
Faculty Scholarship
The debate over application of peer review to the regulatory decisions of administrative agencies has heated up in the last year. Part of the larger and controversial sound science movement, mandating peer review for certain types of agency decisions has recently been championed by the White House and proponents in Congress. Indeed, this past January the Office of Management and Budget finalized guidelines requiring peer review for large classes of agency activities. These initiatives have not gone unchallenged, and a fierce debate has resulted between those who claim peer review will strengthen the scientific basis of agency decisions and those …
An Empirical Study Of Securities Disclosure Practice, Mitu Gulati, Stephen J. Choi
An Empirical Study Of Securities Disclosure Practice, Mitu Gulati, Stephen J. Choi
Faculty Scholarship
Using a dataset of sovereign bond offering documents and underlying bond contracts for ten sovereign issuers from 1985-2005, we examine the securities disclosure practices of issuers and attorneys. The sovereign bond market is comprised of sophisticated issuers with highly paid law firms. If anyone complies fully with federal securities disclosure requirements, we expect sovereign issuers and their attorneys to do so. On the other hand, network effects that determine what information issuers chose to disclose as well as the high cost of determining what information is required for disclosure may lead issuers to fail to meet their disclosure duties. We …
Does The Plaintiff Matter?: An Empirical Analysis Of Lead Plaintiffs In Securities Class Actions, James D. Cox, Randall S. Thomas, Dana Kiku
Does The Plaintiff Matter?: An Empirical Analysis Of Lead Plaintiffs In Securities Class Actions, James D. Cox, Randall S. Thomas, Dana Kiku
Faculty Scholarship
With the enactment of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLR) the U.S. Congress introduced sweeping substantive and procedural reforms for securities class actions. A central provision of the Act is the lead plaintiff provision, which creates a rebuttable presumption that the investor with the largest financial interest in a securities fraud class action should be appointed the lead plaintiff for the suit. The lead plaintiff provision was adopted to encourage a class member with a large financial stake to become the class representative. Congress expected that such a plaintiff would actively monitor the conduct of a securities …