Law Commons^™

"If We Recant, Would We Qualify?": Exclusion Of Religious Providers From State Social Service Voucher Programs, Rebecca G. Rees

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Religion And Democracy, Steven Shiffrin

Notre Dame Law Review

No abstract provided.

Religion And Democracy, Steven H. Shiffrin

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Should citizens armed with religious reasons for public policy outcomes present those reasons in the public forum or otherwise rely on them in making decisions? Those questions have produced a flurry of scholarship, both within and outside of the law. Moreover, as Kent Greenawalt's work richly demonstrates, these related questions raise many more questions still. Do the answers to those questions differ, for example, if the citizen is a judge, a legislator, a columnist, a religious leader, or a "mere" voter? Are some religious reasons acceptable for presentation in a public forum, but not others?

If one holds a constricted …

Religious Freedom And Civic Responsibility, Amy Gutmann

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Myths, Miscues, And Misconceptions: No-Aid Separationism And The Establishment Clause, Carl H. Esbeck

Faculty Publications

In neutrality theory the recipients of vouchers, grants, and purchase-of-service contracts are eligible to participate as providers in government social service programs without regard to their religious character. Indeed, religious beliefs and practices are prohibited bases for screening out those who want to be welfare program providers. Notable examples of congressional social service legislation conforming to the rule of religious neutrality are the ‘charitable choice‘ feature imbedded in the Welfare Reform Act of 1996 and the Community Services Block Grant Act of 1998, as well as the provision allowing issuance of child care vouchers to indigent parents in the Child …

Faith, Reason, And Bare Animosity, Daniel A. Crane

Campbell Law Review

This article critiques the convergence of the nonestablishment and "naked animosity" principles as applied to religiously motivated state action.