Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- BFOQ (1)
- Bona fide occupational qualification (1)
- Carolina Freight Carriers Corp. (1)
- Commercial interests (1)
- Direct evidence (1)
-
- Discrimination (1)
- Dislike (1)
- Disparate impact (1)
- Disparate treatment (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1)
- Grant v. General Motors (1)
- Hazen Paper Company v. Biggins (1)
- Inconsistent (1)
- Judge (1)
- LCPS_Disc (1)
- Personal (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act (1)
- Prejudice (1)
- Richard Posner (1)
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Title VII (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Dismantling Of Mcdonnell Douglas V. Green: The High Court Muddies The Evidentiary Waters In Circumstantial Discrimination Cases, Melissa A. Essary
The Dismantling Of Mcdonnell Douglas V. Green: The High Court Muddies The Evidentiary Waters In Circumstantial Discrimination Cases, Melissa A. Essary
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Employment Discrimination: Recent Developments In The Supreme Court (Symposium: The Supreme Court And Local Government Law: The 1992-93 Term), Eileen Kaufman
Employment Discrimination: Recent Developments In The Supreme Court (Symposium: The Supreme Court And Local Government Law: The 1992-93 Term), Eileen Kaufman
Scholarly Works
At a symposium entitled, “The Supreme Court and Local Government Law; The 1992/93 Term”, Professor Eileen Kaufman spoke about the cases involving employment discrimination that were decided during that particular Term, Hazen Paper Company v. Biggins and St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks. While Hazen is an age discrimination case and St. Mary's is a Title VII case, they can be viewed as companion cases which serve to explain what an employment discrimination plaintiff must now establish when attempting to prove disparate treatment by indirect evidence. By way of preview, suffice it to say that plaintiff's task has been made …
Condescending Contradictions: Richard Posner's Pragmatism And Pregnancy Discrimination, Ann C. Mcginley, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Condescending Contradictions: Richard Posner's Pragmatism And Pregnancy Discrimination, Ann C. Mcginley, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Richard Posner’s, the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, judicial actions have been criticized, primarily for inconsistently commingling economic analysis with other approaches to decisionmaking in an effort to reach personally pleasing results that are at odds with Posner's professed commitment to methodological rigor. Although criticism of Posner's judging is diverse, a common theme is that he too frequently marshals his argumentative force merely to uphold the economic rights of the powerful. In other words, according to the critics, after the rush of intellectual excitement subsides, litigants and the justice system are left …