Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- BNS Inc. v. Koppers Co. (1)
- Baker (1)
- Basic Inc. v. Levinson (1)
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America (1)
-
- City Capital Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Interco Inc. (1)
- Dominick v. Vassar (1)
- Dynamics Corp. of America v. CTS Corp (1)
- Facet Enterprises Inc. v. Prospect Group (1)
- Grand Metropolitan PLC v. Pillsbury Co. (1)
- In re Holly Farms Corp. Shareholders Litigation (1)
- Index (1)
- Moran v. Household International (1)
- Newcome v. Esrey (1)
- Newman v. Prior (1)
- Nomad Acquisition Corp. v. Damon Corp. (1)
- Nonstock Corporation Act (1)
- RICO (1)
- Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (1)
- Revlon Inc. v. Mac Andrews & Forbes Holdings (1)
- SEC (1)
- Securities & Exchange Commission (1)
- Southdown Inc. v. Moore McCormack Resources (1)
- Southwest Forest Industries (1)
- Taylor v. First Union Corp. of South Carolina (1)
- Topper Acquisition Corp. v. Emhart Corp. (1)
- United States v. CarilionHealth System (1)
- Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co. (1)
- Watts & Co. v. Miles & Stockbridge (1)
- Williams Act (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Business And Corporate Law, Donald E. King
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Business And Corporate Law, Donald E. King
University of Richmond Law Review
This article reviews recent developments in the law affecting Virginia businesses and corporations. Part I covers judicial decisions, including: (1) two Eastern District of Virginia cases in which Virginia corporate law was applied to help ward-off hostile takeovers; (2) three Fourth Circuit opinions affecting private actions under the federal securities laws; (3) a Supreme Court of Virginia decision specifically enforcing a close corporation buy-sell agreement against a deceased shareholder's widow; (4) an Eastern District of Virginia case in which close corporation squeeze-out allegations were held sufficient to state a federal claim for securities fraud; and (5) a Western District of …
The Defensive And Offensive Use Of "Poison Pills" Within The Business Judgment Rule, Wendy B. Gayle
The Defensive And Offensive Use Of "Poison Pills" Within The Business Judgment Rule, Wendy B. Gayle
University of Richmond Law Review
Corporate directors owe fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to the corporation and its shareholders as a result of their position of control. In general, the standard for the duty of care owed by a director is one of a prudent person in similar circumstances. The duty of loyalty prohibits directors from engaging in self-dealing transactions and acts of bad faith.