Law Commons^™

Agenda: Proceedings Of The Sino-American Conference On Environmental Law, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Proceedings of the Sino-American Conference on Environmental Law (August 16)

On August 16 through 18, 1987 a delegation of 10 Americans met with a 14-member Chinese delegation to compare the systems of environmental law in the two countries. The meetings were held on and near the campus of the University of Peking in Beijing, People's Republic of China. This program was the fruition of nearly three years of discussion, planning, and organization involving Dean Betsy Levin and the Natural Resources Law Center.

The keynote speaker was Qu Geping, Director of the Chinese National Environmental Protection Bureau (comparable to the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). He spoke of the …

The General Policy Of Controlling The Environment Comprehensively To Make The Chinese Economy And Environment Gradually Develop In Harmony, Yan Liu

Proceedings of the Sino-American Conference on Environmental Law (August 16)

7 pages.

Development Of Chinese Environmental Management Structure, Zhu Zhong Jie

Proceedings of the Sino-American Conference on Environmental Law (August 16)

5 pages.

Air Protection And Energy Usage, Han Chen Wang

Proceedings of the Sino-American Conference on Environmental Law (August 16)

6 pages.

Establishment And Practice Of The Chinese Environmental Impact Assessment System, Dao Lian Lin

Proceedings of the Sino-American Conference on Environmental Law (August 16)

12 pages.

The Joint Venture And Related Contract Laws Of Mainland China And Taiwan: A Comparative Analysis, Clyde D. Stoltenberg, David W. Mcclure

Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies

No abstract provided.

"It Is Better To Enter A Tiger's Mouth Than A Court Of Law" Or Dispute Resolution Alternatives In U.S.-China Trade, Steven N. Robinson, George R.A. Doumar

Penn State International Law Review

This article examines the influence Chinese attitudes toward law have upon the various methods of dispute resolution in United States-China trade. It concludes that, although reasonably effective mechanisms for the resolution of disputes are available, the primary emphasis of counsel should be to prevent the dispute from occurring through promoting informed negotiation of the original contract.