Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Political Behavior Of Lawyers In The Louisiana House Of Representatives, Patrick F. O'Connor, Richard L. Engstrom, Justin J. Green, Chong Lim Kim
The Political Behavior Of Lawyers In The Louisiana House Of Representatives, Patrick F. O'Connor, Richard L. Engstrom, Justin J. Green, Chong Lim Kim
Louisiana Law Review
No abstract provided.
Before The Law: An Analysis For The Legal Profession, Victor A. Fleming
Before The Law: An Analysis For The Legal Profession, Victor A. Fleming
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Lawyer And The Terrorist: Another Ethical Dilemma, F. Thomas Schornhorst
The Lawyer And The Terrorist: Another Ethical Dilemma, F. Thomas Schornhorst
Indiana Law Journal
Terrorism and the Media: Legal Responses, Symposium
A Lesson From Trollope For Counselors At Law, Thomas L. Shaffer
A Lesson From Trollope For Counselors At Law, Thomas L. Shaffer
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Justice Delayed? A Report From The Court Administrator, C. R. Huie, G. Lawrence Jegley
Is Justice Delayed? A Report From The Court Administrator, C. R. Huie, G. Lawrence Jegley
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legal Representation Of Conflicting Interests: A View Towards Better Self-Regulation, Marc Sangree Primiani
Legal Representation Of Conflicting Interests: A View Towards Better Self-Regulation, Marc Sangree Primiani
Santa Clara Law Review
No abstract provided.
Presuming Lawyers Competent To Protect Fundamental Rights: Is It An Affordable Fiction?, Robert G. Lawson
Presuming Lawyers Competent To Protect Fundamental Rights: Is It An Affordable Fiction?, Robert G. Lawson
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This article explores the ramifications of Wainwright v. Sykes, a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States in 1977. The broad question before the Court in Sykes concerned the extent to which state prisoners should have access to federal court by use of the writ of habeas corpus. The narrow issue before the Court concerned the impact on a prisoner's claim for habeas relief of procedural defaults (such as a failure to object to evidence, a failure to perfect an appeal, etc.) that occur in the state proceeding under attack. In considering these important issues Justice …