Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
05-15-1970 Justice Harlan, Per Curiam, John Harlan
05-15-1970 Justice Harlan, Per Curiam, John Harlan
Wyman v. Rothstein, 398 U.S. 275 (1970)
Per Curiam.
Appellees commenced this action in the federal District Court for the Southern District of New York challenging on equal protection and statutory grounds 131-a of the New York Welfare Law which provides for payments to welfare recipients in Nassau, Suffolk, and other New York State counties in lesser amounts then provided for residents of New York City should the Welfare Administrator determine the adequate cause exists for the differential. A three-judge court was convened and it found that appelllees' likelihood for success on their constitutional claim warranted the issuance of preliminary injunction against what it found to be …
05-12-1970 Correspondence From Brennan To Harlan, William J. Brennan
05-12-1970 Correspondence From Brennan To Harlan, William J. Brennan
Wyman v. Rothstein, 398 U.S. 275 (1970)
Dear John,
I agree with your Per Curiam in the above case.
Sincerely,
W.J.B. Jr.
05-12-1970 Correspondence From White To Harlan, Byron R. White
05-12-1970 Correspondence From White To Harlan, Byron R. White
Wyman v. Rothstein, 398 U.S. 275 (1970)
Dear John:
Please join me.
Sincerely,
B.R.W
05-12-1970 Correspondence From Stewart To Harlan, Potter Stewart
05-12-1970 Correspondence From Stewart To Harlan, Potter Stewart
Wyman v. Rothstein, 398 U.S. 275 (1970)
Dear John,
I am glad to join your per curiam opinion, with one suggestion: that the phrase "if necessary" in the 3rd line from the bottom on page 2 be changed to "if the question is reached."
Sincerely yours,
P.S.
05-11-1970 Justice Harlan, Per Curiam, John Harlan
05-11-1970 Justice Harlan, Per Curiam, John Harlan
Wyman v. Rothstein, 398 U.S. 275 (1970)
Per Curiam.
Appellees commenced this action in the federal District Court for the Southern District of New York challenging on equal protection and statutory grounds 131-a of the New York Welfare Law which provides for payments to welfare recipients in Nassau, Suffolk, and other New York state counties in lesser amounts than provided for residents of New York City should the Welfare Administrator determine that adequate cause exists for the differential. A three-judge court was convened and it found that appellees' likelihood of success on their constitutional claim warranted the issue of a preliminary injunction against what it found to …