Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Due process (4)
- Fifth Amendment (4)
- Illinois (2)
- Minnesota (2)
-
- National Prohibition Act (2)
- Adequate defense (1)
- Alabama (1)
- Amending Power (1)
- Amendments (1)
- American Legion (1)
- Arbitrary exercises of power (1)
- Article V (1)
- Bank trusts (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Blackmer v. United States (1)
- Bond issues (1)
- Buck v. Kuykendall (1)
- Burnet v. Coronado Oil and Gas Co. (1)
- Capitol Traction Co. v. Hof (1)
- Commercial treaties (1)
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1)
- Congressional districts (1)
- Connecticut (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional theory (1)
- Constitutionality (1)
- Contempt proceedings (1)
- Coombes v. Getz (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Right To Trial By Jury In Prosecutions For Petty Federal Offenses, Melville Stewart
The Right To Trial By Jury In Prosecutions For Petty Federal Offenses, Melville Stewart
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Due Process And Equal Protection - Right Of Counsel
Constitutional Law - Due Process And Equal Protection - Right Of Counsel
Michigan Law Review
The Scottsboro cases decided by the Supreme Court at the present term raise several interesting constitutional questions. The judgments were assailed on the ground that they were violative of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment in three respects: (1) that the negroes were tried by juries from which members of their race were systematically excluded; (2) that they were not accorded a fair, impartial and deliberate trial; (3) that due process was denied because the right of counsel, with the usual incidents of consultation and adequate preparation for trial, was lacking. While the Supreme Court …
What Is A "Contract" Under The Contracts Clause Of The Federal Constitution?, Paul G. Kauper
What Is A "Contract" Under The Contracts Clause Of The Federal Constitution?, Paul G. Kauper
Michigan Law Review
The case of Coombes v. Getz, recently decided by the United States Supreme Court, raises in a crucial way the question of what is a contract within the meaning of Article I, section 10 of the Constitution, forbidding States to pass laws impairing the obligations of contracts. A provision of the California Constitution in force at the time the plaintiffs brought this action in the state court below made directors of corporations jointly and severally liable to the creditors and stockholders for all moneys embezzled or misappropriated by the officers of the corporation during the term of office of …
The Power Of A State To Control The Export Of Hydro-Electric Energy, James W. Simonton
The Power Of A State To Control The Export Of Hydro-Electric Energy, James W. Simonton
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law-Vested Right In Remedy
Municipal Corporations-Power Of Board Of Appeals To Vary Application Of Zoning Ordinance
Municipal Corporations-Power Of Board Of Appeals To Vary Application Of Zoning Ordinance
Michigan Law Review
Although there was some dispute among the earlier authorities, it is the rule today that comprehensive zoning ordinances, if enacted under proper legislative authority, are constitutional and will be upheld in so far as they are reasonable in application. In order to give aggrieved property owners an opportunity to obtain relief upon the basis of the ordinance itself without attacking its constitutionality, it has become common practice to give the board of appeals the power to vary the operation of the ordinance in specific cases.
Constitutional Law-Stare Decisis
Constitutional Law-Stare Decisis
Michigan Law Review
The defendant corporation, a lessee of school lands from the state of Oklahoma, protested the right of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to tax its net income. Held, under the rule of Gillespie v. Oklahoma, the income cannot be taxed without interfering with a state instrumentality. Four dissenting justices-Stone, Brandeis, Roberts, and Cardozo--admitted the applicability but denied the wisdom of the Gillespie case and the inability of the court to overrule itself, in Burnet v. Coronado Oil and Gas Co.
Constitutional Law-Public Purpose-Feed Loans To Destitute Farmers
Constitutional Law-Public Purpose-Feed Loans To Destitute Farmers
Michigan Law Review
Pursuant to a constitutional provision enabling such action, the Governor asked the supreme court of South Dakota the following question: "Could the legislature enact legislation which would permit the several counties as a county enterprise to raise funds either by supplemental budget or bond or warrant issues with which they might in turn furnish feed loans or even distribute feed as a part of a county poor relief system . . . ?" In answer to this question the court held, in In re Opinion of the Judges, that the furnishing of feed or feed loans to individuals …
Taxation-Constitutionality Of A Conclusive Presumption That A Transfer Executed Within A Limited Period Before Death Is Made In Contemplation Of Death
Michigan Law Review
Motion for a refund was made by the plaintiff on the ground that certain transfers made within two years preceding the death of the decedent should not have been taxed under the federal estate tax since they were not in fact made in contemplation of death. The defendant filed a demurrer on the ground that under the provisions of sec. 302 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1926, such transfers were taxable regardless of the motive impelling them. The section reads: "Where within two years prior to his death . . . and without such a consideration the decedent has …
The West Virginia Municipal Home Rule Proposal, Jeff B. Fordham
The West Virginia Municipal Home Rule Proposal, Jeff B. Fordham
West Virginia Law Review
In the first instalment of this paper, which appeared in the last issue of the Quarterly, it was sought to present an outline picture of the legal position of municipalities in West Virginia's governmental system upon a background of appropriate historical materials. The immediate purpose is to consider the home rule proposal which has appeared on the scene so depicted.
Constitutional Law - Due Process-Business "Affected With A Public Interest''
Constitutional Law - Due Process-Business "Affected With A Public Interest''
Michigan Law Review
Ever since Munn v. Illinois there has been continuous dispute as to what regulation is deprivation of property without due process of law within the prohibition of the Fourteenth Amendment. In this first case Chief Justice Waite, discussing with approval prior statutes regulating the rates of chimney sweeps and of auctioneers, the price of bread, the charges of draymen and of hackneycabs, concluded that, if these might be regulated, surely so important a matter as the rates of the great grain elevators in Chicago might be subjected to regulation. The position taken was expressed by these sentences: "From this it …
Constitutional Law--Zoning Board Of Appeals--Dispensing Power, Donald M. Hutton
Constitutional Law--Zoning Board Of Appeals--Dispensing Power, Donald M. Hutton
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law-Criminal Procedure-Comment By Judge On Evidence
Constitutional Law-Criminal Procedure-Comment By Judge On Evidence
Michigan Law Review
In the recent case of People v. Kelly, the Illinois supreme court decided (two justices dissenting) that the common law right of a judge, in charging the jury, to comment on the evidence and advise as to the facts was not an essential attribute of trial by jury as it, existed at common law, and held that a statute limiting the charge strictly to matters of law was not an infringement of the right of trial by jury guaranteed by successive Illinois constitutions. The court also decided, in upholding the legislative enactment, that this restriction of the functions of …
Constitutional Law - Redistricting For Congressional Elections - Lawmaking Power Of The State
Constitutional Law - Redistricting For Congressional Elections - Lawmaking Power Of The State
Michigan Law Review
By the latest reapportionment of the House of Representatives (tit. 2, U. S. C. A., art. 2a), passed in 1929, Minnesota received one less representative than it had had by the previous apportionment (Act of 1911, tit. 2, U. S. C. A., sec. 2). The state legislature of Minnesota passed an act dividing the state into congressional districts in accordance with this apportionment, and the governor vetoed the bill. Thereupon the state house of representatives, by resolution, directed the secretary of state to enroll the bill as a law on the ground that the veto of the governor was a …
Evidence -The Possibility Of Incrimination In A State Jurisdiction Does Not Warrant The Assertion Of The Constitutional Privilege In Federal Proceedings
Michigan Law Review
On indictment for the refusal to give information requested by the authorized revenue agent, the appellee interposed a special plea averring that it would compel him to become a witness against himself in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the federal Constitution which reads, "nor shall any person be compelled to be a witness against himself." Held, the danger of incrimination in a state court was not grounds for asserting the constitutional privilege. United States v. Murdock, 284 U. S. 141, 52 Sup. Ct. 63, 76 L. ed. 83 (1931).
Political Theory And Practice, Everett S. Brown
Political Theory And Practice, Everett S. Brown
Michigan Law Review
A review of THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN POLITICAL THOUGHT. A DOCUMENTARY HISTORY. By J. Mark Jacobson, Ph.D.
The Doctrine Of The Amendability Of The United States Constitution, Hugh Evander Willis
The Doctrine Of The Amendability Of The United States Constitution, Hugh Evander Willis
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Judicial Process Of Treaty Interpretation In The United States Supreme Court, John Selden Tennant
The Judicial Process Of Treaty Interpretation In The United States Supreme Court, John Selden Tennant
Michigan Law Review
When the Federal Union was substituted for the loose confederation which had preceded it, one of the most impelling reasons for the change was the need for a united international front, which could only be achieved by further concentration in a central government of the power to deal with foreign nations. A necessary part of this general plan was the treaty-making power, taken from the states by Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution, and lodged in the President and the Senate by Article II, Section II.
Constitutional Law--Income Tax--Husband And Wife As Taxable Unit, Bernard Sclove
Constitutional Law--Income Tax--Husband And Wife As Taxable Unit, Bernard Sclove
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law-Extending Term Of Prosecuting Attorney
Constitutional Law-Extending Term Of Prosecuting Attorney
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of The American Legion Plan To Perpetuate Peace, Paul V. Mcnutt, Ralph T. O'Neil, C. B. Robbins
The Constitutionality Of The American Legion Plan To Perpetuate Peace, Paul V. Mcnutt, Ralph T. O'Neil, C. B. Robbins
Indiana Law Journal
The popularly named "Universal Draft" bill espoused by the American Legion was the occasion of extended hearings before the War Policies Commission in March, 1931. During those hearings many questions were raised concerning the powers of the Congress and of the President. The material of this article was incorporated in a memorandum prepared and filed in response to those questions by Mr. McNutt, Mr. O'Neil and Colonel Robbins, acting on behalf of the American Legion. Mr. McNutt and Mr. O'Neil are Past National Commanders of the Legion and are members of the Indiana and Nebraska bars, respectively. Colonel Robbins is …
Constitutional Law-Compelling Witness Duty From Absent Nationals
Constitutional Law-Compelling Witness Duty From Absent Nationals
Michigan Law Review
In proceedings taken under the so-called Walsh Act the petitioner, Blackmer, a United States citizen residing in France, was found guilty of contempt for failure to respond to subpoenas issued out of a federal court and served on him in France by a United States consul requiring him to appear as a witness in that court. See 30 MICH. L. REV. 137 (1931) for a more detailed statement of the facts. By a unanimous decision (Mr. Justice Roberts not participating) the United States Supreme Court recently held that the contempt decree be affirmed, thus sustaining the constitutionality of the Walsh …
Constitutional Law -Is Redistricting Of A State For Congressional Elections An Exercise Of The Lawmaking Power Of The State?
Michigan Law Review
The governor of Minnesota vetoed an act of the legislature dividing the state into congressional districts in accordance with the latest re-apportionment of the House of Representatives (46 Stat. 21, 26). Thereupon the state house of representatives by resolution directed the secretary of state to enroll the bill as a law. In an action started to test the validity of the law, held, Art. 1, Sec. 4 (1) of the Constitution of the United States provides that, "The time and place of holding elections for senators and representatives shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof; but …
Constitutional Law - Extent Of State Police Power In Protection Of Public Health
Constitutional Law - Extent Of State Police Power In Protection Of Public Health
Michigan Law Review
An Illinois statute prohibited the manufacture or sale of milk to which had been added any fat or oil other than milk fat. The defendant was engaged in manufacturing for sale outside of the state a product composed of skimmed milk and cocoanut oil which was not deleterious to health in any way. When it was sought to recover the penalty imposed by the statute for its violation, it was claimed that the law was unconstitutional in that it deprived the defendant of property without due process of law. The court held that the statute was an invalid exercise of …
Equity- Constitutional Law - Power Of Legislature To Change Equitable Doctrines
Equity- Constitutional Law - Power Of Legislature To Change Equitable Doctrines
Michigan Law Review
A Nebraska statute provided that in case of insolvency of a state bank the general depositors, subject to prior liens for taxes, have a first lien on all assets of the bank. A bank converted a note deposited for a special purpose, and indistinguishably mingled the proceeds with the general assets of the bank before insolvency. The deposit was held to have created a trust and the cestui was allowed to recover the amount of the note (trust fund) as a preferred claim upon the general assets of the bank. To the argument that this statute prohibited the imposition of …
Intoxicating Liquors-Constitutional Law-Criminal Law-Double Jeopardy
Intoxicating Liquors-Constitutional Law-Criminal Law-Double Jeopardy
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Constitution And The International Labor Conventions, Harold W. Stoke
The Constitution And The International Labor Conventions, Harold W. Stoke
Michigan Law Review
The International Labor Organization, since its establishment in 1919, has become one of the most active of the international institutions of the post-war period. It was founded upon that provision of the Treaty of Versailles which binds each signatory nation and those which should later join the organization to endeavor to secure and maintain fair and humane conditions of labor for men, women and children, both in their own countries and in the countries to which their commercial and industrial relations extend.
Constitutional Law--Separation Of Powers--Water Power Act, Bernard Sclove
Constitutional Law--Separation Of Powers--Water Power Act, Bernard Sclove
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Presumptions - Constitutional Validity Of Statute Establishing Proof Of Reputation As Prima Facie Evidence Of Commission Of Crime
Michigan Law Review
The rise and sway of the gangster as a menace to American social and economic security has led, of late, to the employment of unique means of combating lawlessness. Faced by a tremendous increase in the difficulties lying in the path of those seeking the conviction of professional criminals for major crimes, the police and prosecutors often turn towards a means of fighting crime originally devised to make life uncomfortable for petty off enders. The enforcement of the pistol laws and the vagrancy statutes against millionaire gangsters, and repeated arrests on suspicion, have been resorted to as a means of …