Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Procedure (43)
- Torts (32)
- Litigation (31)
- Securities Law (19)
- Courts (16)
-
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (13)
- Consumer Protection Law (11)
- Legal Remedies (9)
- Business Organizations Law (8)
- Contracts (7)
- Labor and Employment Law (7)
- Supreme Court of the United States (7)
- Civil Law (6)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (6)
- Law and Economics (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (5)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (4)
- Commercial Law (4)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Banking and Finance Law (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- International Law (3)
- Judges (3)
- Agency (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (16)
- Columbia Law School (15)
- Boston University School of Law (13)
- Fordham Law School (9)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (9)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- St. Mary's University (5)
- University of Missouri School of Law (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Southern Methodist University (4)
- University of Kentucky (4)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (4)
- Emory University School of Law (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
- University of South Carolina (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Nova Southeastern University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (40)
- Scholarly Works (20)
- Faculty Articles (10)
- Faculty Publications (9)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (9)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Articles (6)
- Publications (6)
- Journal Articles (5)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (4)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Other Publications (2)
- Amicus Briefs (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Bolch Judicial Institute Publications (1)
- Con Law Center Articles and Publications (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Georgia Business Court Opinions (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (1)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (1)
- Popular Media (1)
- Presentations and Speeches (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 142
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Undemocratic Class Action, Nicholas Almendares
The Undemocratic Class Action, Nicholas Almendares
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Class actions can have profound effects. But theorists, policymakers, and judges have long worried that attorneys can use them for their own advantage, reaping generous rewards for themselves while class members receive next to nothing. Unlike citizens or shareholders, members of a class cannot exercise democratic control over the attorney that nominally works on their behalf. I label this the democratic critique of class actions, and it has been the dominant framework for understanding class actions, shaping both case law and reform proposals.
The democratic critique is based on a false premise, though, because it does not take into account …
Event-Driven Suits And The Rethinking Of Securities Litigation, Merritt B. Fox, Joshua Mitts
Event-Driven Suits And The Rethinking Of Securities Litigation, Merritt B. Fox, Joshua Mitts
Faculty Scholarship
Event-driven securities suits-ones that arise after an issuer has experienced some kind of disaster-have become increasingly prevalent in recent years. These suits are based on the fraud-on-the-market doctrine, a doctrine that ultimately gives rise to the bulk of the damages paid out in settlements and judgments pursuant to private litigation under the U.S. securities laws. The theory behind fraud-on-the-market cases is that when an issuer's share price has been inflated by a Rule-10b-5-violating misstatement, investors who purchased shares at the inflated price have suffered a compensable injury if they still hold the shares after the inflation is gone. Although these …
Participatory Litigation: A New Framework For Impact Lawyering, Jules Lobel
Participatory Litigation: A New Framework For Impact Lawyering, Jules Lobel
Articles
This Article argues that the manner in which class-action and impact lawyers have traditionally litigated leaves little room for class participation in lawsuits, and that a new, participatory framework can and should be adopted. Through the story of a successful class-action suit challenging California’s use of prolonged solitary confinement in its prisons, the Article demonstrates that plaintiff participation is both possible and important.
Academic literature has assumed that broad plaintiff participation in class-action and impact litigation is not achievable. Yet this Article describes how, in a key California case, attorneys actively involved the plaintiffs in all aspects of the litigation: …
Ethical Duties Of Class Counsel Also Representing Class Representatives, Nancy J. Moore
Ethical Duties Of Class Counsel Also Representing Class Representatives, Nancy J. Moore
Faculty Scholarship
In their excellent article entitled May Class Counsel Also Represent Lead Plaintiffs?,1 Professors Bruce Green and Andrew Kent explore a particular aspect of two broader questions I have also addressed: (1) who should regulate class action lawyers;2 and (2) who will regulate class action lawyers?3 I, too, focused on lawyers' conflicts of interest; however, Professors Green and Kent focus even more specifically on conflicts arising from class counsel's simultaneous representation of both the class and individual clients who are serving or will serve as class representatives. Their concern is with three particular scenarios in which the class …
The Roberts Court And Class Litigation: Revolution, Evolution, And Work To Be Done, Richard D. Freer
The Roberts Court And Class Litigation: Revolution, Evolution, And Work To Be Done, Richard D. Freer
Faculty Articles
Since 2005, when John Roberts was appointed Chief Justice, there have been startling changes to the world of class actions. Jurisdictionally, the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 fundamentally reconfigured the allocation of class litigation between federal and state courts. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the federal class action provision, has been amended three times in the Roberts years, once in a meaningful way. Our focus, however, is on what the Roberts Court has done in the class action world through its caselaw. On that score, we have a remarkable corpus. From Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. …
Brief Of Complex Litigation Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent, Myriam E. Gilles
Brief Of Complex Litigation Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent, Myriam E. Gilles
Amicus Briefs
The amici are law professors who teach and write in the field of federal civil procedure and complex litigation. Amici share an interest in presenting this Court with an impartial view on the function of the class action and its relationship to the law of Article III justiciability to inform the question presented in this case.
A Fiduciary Judge's Guide To Awarding Fees In Class Actions, Brian T. Fitzpatrick
A Fiduciary Judge's Guide To Awarding Fees In Class Actions, Brian T. Fitzpatrick
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
It is often said that judges act as fiduciaries for the absent class members in class action litigation. If we take this seriously, how then should judges award fees to the lawyers who represent these class members? The answer is to award fees the same way rational class members would want if they could do it on their own. In this Essay, I draw on economic models and data from the market for legal representation of sophisticated clients to describe what these fee practices should look like. Although more data from sophisticated clients is no doubt needed, what we do …
Classaction.Gov, Amanda M. Rose
Classaction.Gov, Amanda M. Rose
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This Essay proposes the creation of a federally run class action website and supporting administration (collectively, Classaction.gov) that would both operate a comprehensive research database on class actions and assume many of the notice and claims-processing functions performed by class action claims administrators today. Classaction.gov would bring long-demanded transparency to class actions and, through forces of legitimization and coordination, would substantially increase the rate of consumer participation in class action settlements. It also holds the key to mitigating other problems in class action practice, such as the inefficiencies and potential abuses associated with multiforum litigation, the limited success of the …
Information For The Common Good In Mass Torts, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Alexandra D. Lahav
Information For The Common Good In Mass Torts, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Alexandra D. Lahav
Scholarly Works
In recent years, judges have privileged confidentiality over transparency in discovery, especially in large scale multidistrict litigation such as the Opiate litigation. By uncovering the assumptions underlying our current regime, this Article sheds light on the process that got us here as a first step towards re-envisioning the rules governing information in litigation. We investigate an untold history of discovery’s publicity to show that many of our assumptions about what is public and what is private is historically contingent, even accidental. So too are our assumptions about the best way to arrive at truth.
Accordingly, we suggest that courts ought …
The Settlement Trap, Lindsey Simon
The Settlement Trap, Lindsey Simon
Scholarly Works
Mass tort victims often wait years for resolution of their personal injury claims, but many who successfully navigate this arduous process will not receive a single dollar of their settlement award. According to applicable bankruptcy and state law, settlement payments may be an asset of the estate that the trustee, exercising its significant authority, administers and distributes to creditors instead of a claimant who had filed for bankruptcy. This distribution power maximizes repayment, a critical counterbalance to the robust protections and benefits that debtors receive in bankruptcy.
Setting aside the perceived unfairness of taking desperately needed money from tort victims, …
Mdl Revolution, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Abbe Gluck
Mdl Revolution, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Abbe Gluck
Scholarly Works
Over the past 50 years, multidistrict litigation (MDL) has quietly revolutionized civil procedure. MDLs include the largest tort cases in U.S. history, but without the authority of the class-action rule, MDL judges—who formally have only pretrial jurisdiction over individual cases—have resorted to extraordinary procedural exceptionalism to settle cases on a national scale. Substantive state laws, personal jurisdiction, transparency, impartiality, reviewability, federalism, and adequate representation must all yield if doing so fulfills that one goal.
Somehow, until now, this has remained below the surface to everyone but MDL insiders. Thanks to the sprawling MDL over the opioid crisis—and unprecedented opposition to …
In Re Endochoice Holdings Inc. Order Preliminarily Approving Class Action Settlement And Providing For Issuance Of Notice, Elizabeth E. Long
In Re Endochoice Holdings Inc. Order Preliminarily Approving Class Action Settlement And Providing For Issuance Of Notice, Elizabeth E. Long
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Cutting Class Action Agency Costs: Lessons From The Public Company, Amanda M. Rose
Cutting Class Action Agency Costs: Lessons From The Public Company, Amanda M. Rose
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The agency relationship between class counsel and class members in Rule 23(b)(3) class actions is similar to that between executives and shareholders in U.S. public companies. This similarity has often been noted in class action literature, but until this Article no attempt has been made to systematically compare the approaches taken in these two settings to reduce agency costs. Class action scholars have downplayed the importance of the public company analogy because public companies are subject to market discipline and class actions are not. But this is precisely why the analogy is useful: because public companies are subject to market …
The Guardian Trustee In Bankruptcy Courts And Beyond, Lindsey Simon
The Guardian Trustee In Bankruptcy Courts And Beyond, Lindsey Simon
Scholarly Works
Litigation systems create dangers of unfairness. Citizens worry, and should worry, about exploitive settlements in aggregate litigation, potential biases in administrative proceedings, and troubling power imbalances in criminal trials. Public confidence in adjudicative processes has eroded to an all-time low. This Article explores the untapped potential of adding independent watchdog entities to address systemic threats to the integrity of government decisionmaking. These entities, which I call “guardian trustees,” do not fit within the traditional framework of our adversary system. Though guardian trustees already operate in bankruptcy proceedings, they have thus far received little attention in scholarly literature. This Article begins …
Follow The Money? A Proposed Approach For Disclosure Of Litigation Finance Agreements, Maya Steinitz
Follow The Money? A Proposed Approach For Disclosure Of Litigation Finance Agreements, Maya Steinitz
Faculty Scholarship
Litigation finance is the new and fast-growing practice by which a non-party funds a plaintiff’s litigation either for-profit or for some other motivation. Some estimates placed the size of the litigation finance market at 50–100 billion dollars. Both proponents and opponents of this newly -emergent phenomenon are in agreement that the it is the most important development in civil justice of this era. Litigation finance is already transforming civil litigation at the level of the single case as well as, incrementally, at the level of the civil justice system as a whole. It is also beginning to transform the way …
Does Multidistrict Litigation Deny Plaintiffs Due Process?, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Does Multidistrict Litigation Deny Plaintiffs Due Process?, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
The Myth Of Morrison: Securities Fraud Litigation Against Foreign Issuers, Robert Bartlett, Matthew D. Cain, Jill E. Fisch, Steven Davidoff Solomon
The Myth Of Morrison: Securities Fraud Litigation Against Foreign Issuers, Robert Bartlett, Matthew D. Cain, Jill E. Fisch, Steven Davidoff Solomon
All Faculty Scholarship
Using a sample of 388 securities fraud lawsuits filed between 2002 and 2017 against foreign issuers, we examine the effect of the Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. We find that the description of Morrison as a steamroller, substantially ending litigation against foreign issuers, is a myth. Instead, we find that Morrison did not significantly change the type of litigation brought against foreign issuers, which, both before and after this case, focused on foreign issuers with a U.S. listing and substantial U.S. trading volume. Although dismissal rates rose post-Morrison, we find no evidence …
Global Settlements: Promise And Peril, John C. Coffee Jr.
Global Settlements: Promise And Peril, John C. Coffee Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
In 2010, Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. destabilized the world of securities litigation by denying those who purchased their securities outside the U.S. the ability to sue in the U.S. (as they had previously often done). Nature, however abhors a vacuum, and practitioners and other jurisdictions began to seek ways to regain access to U.S. courts. Several techniques have emerged: (1) expanding settlement classes so that they are broader than litigation classes and treating the location of the transaction as strictly a merits issue that defendants could waive; (2) adopting U.S. law as applicable to securities issued abroad by …
Financial Impact Of The Opioid Crisis On Local Government: Quantifying Costs For Litigation And Policymaking, Elizabeth Weeks
Financial Impact Of The Opioid Crisis On Local Government: Quantifying Costs For Litigation And Policymaking, Elizabeth Weeks
Scholarly Works
The opioids epidemic has had a significant impact on individuals and communities, including local governments responsible for serving and protecting those affected individuals. This is the first study of its kind to consider whether those local government costs are quantifiable, a question that has salience both for pending opioid litigation in federal and state courts and for local planning and budgeting decisions. This article first provides a detailed description of the opioid litigation landscape, including the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) in Ohio, the Native American tribes’ actions, and various procedural and other hurdles that local government plaintiffs face in seeking …
Guidelines And Best Practices For Large And Mass-Tort Mdls (Second Edition), Bolch Judicial Institute
Guidelines And Best Practices For Large And Mass-Tort Mdls (Second Edition), Bolch Judicial Institute
Bolch Judicial Institute Publications
Mass-tort MDLs dominate the federal civil docket, yet they present enormous challenges to transferee judges assigned to manage them. There is little official guidance and no rules specific to the management of mass-tort MDLs, often requiring the transferee judge to develop procedures out of whole cloth.
Beginning in 2013, the Bolch Judicial Institute (then the Center for Judicial Studies) sought to address this issue through a series of annual bench-bar conferences. From these conferences came the Guidelines and Best Practices for Large and Mass-Tort MDLs document — now in its Second Edition — which is designed to help judges and …
South Africa’S Historic Silicosis Class Action: Why The Settlement Matters, Penelope Andrews
South Africa’S Historic Silicosis Class Action: Why The Settlement Matters, Penelope Andrews
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Deterrence And Aggregate Litigation, Keith N. Hylton
Deterrence And Aggregate Litigation, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
This paper examines the deterrence properties of aggregate litigation and class actions, with an emphasis on positive value claims. In the multiple victim scenario with positive value claims, the probability that an individual victim will bring suit falls toward zero with geometric decay as the number of victims increases. The reason is that the incentive to free ride increases with the number of victims. Deterrence does not collapse but is degraded. Undercompliance is observed, which worsens as the number of victims increases. Compliance is never socially optimal, and the shortfall from optimality increases with the number of victims. These results, …
Employee Voice In Arbitration, Ann C. Hodges
Employee Voice In Arbitration, Ann C. Hodges
Law Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Epic Systems v. Lewis allows employers to force employees to agree to individual arbitration of any claims against the employer, removing their ability to bring class and collective actions. These unilaterally imposed arbitration agreements deprive employees of any voice in this important term of employment.
If arbitration is to serve its intended function of a mutually agreeable forum to resolve disputes, Congress should require employers who desire to use arbitration to negotiate the terms of the agreement with a representative of their affected employees. Such a requirement would reduce some of the adverse effects …
Protecting Consumer Data Privacy With Arbitration, Erin O'Hara O'Connor
Protecting Consumer Data Privacy With Arbitration, Erin O'Hara O'Connor
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
The Admissibility Of Sampling Evidence To Prove Individual Damages In Class Actions, Hillel J. Bavli, John Kenneth Felter
The Admissibility Of Sampling Evidence To Prove Individual Damages In Class Actions, Hillel J. Bavli, John Kenneth Felter
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The 2016 Supreme Court decision in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo revived the use of “representative” or sampling evidence in class actions. Federal courts are now more receptive to class plaintiffs’ efforts to prove classwide liability and, occasionally, aggregate damages, with sampling evidence. However, federal courts still routinely deny motions for class certification because they find that calculations of class members’ individual damages defeat the predominance prerequisite of Rule 23(b)(3). As a result, meritorious classwide claims founder. In this paper, we combine legal and statistical analyses and propose a novel solution to this dilemma that adheres to the Tysondecision …
Disrupting Work Law: Arbitration In The Gig Economy, Charlotte Garden
Disrupting Work Law: Arbitration In The Gig Economy, Charlotte Garden
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
Taking A Second Look At Mdl Product Liability Settlements: Somebody Needs To Do It, Christopher B. Mueller
Taking A Second Look At Mdl Product Liability Settlements: Somebody Needs To Do It, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
This Article examines the forces that lead to the settlement of product liability cases gathered under the MDL statute for pretrial. The MDL procedure is ill-suited to this use, and does not envision the gathering of the underlying cases as a means of finally resolving them. Motivational factors affecting judges and lawyers have produced these settlements, and the conditions out of which they arise do not give confidence that they are fair or adequate. This Article concedes that MDL settlements are likely here to stay, and argues that we need a mechanism to check such settlements for fairness and adequacy. …
The Modern Class Action Rule: Its Civil Rights Roots And Relevance Today, Suzette M. Malveaux
The Modern Class Action Rule: Its Civil Rights Roots And Relevance Today, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
The modern class action rule recently turned fifty years old — a golden anniversary. However, this milestone is marred by an increase in hate crimes, violence and discrimination. Ironically, the rule is marking its anniversary within a similarly tumultuous environment as its birth — the civil rights movement of the 1960’s. This irony calls into question whether this critical aggregation device is functioning as the drafters intended. This article makes three contributions.
First, the article unearths the rule’s rich history, revealing how the rule was designed in 1966 to enable structural reform and broad injunctive relief in civil rights cases. …
Blocking The Courts: The Trump Triple Threat, Joanne Doroshow
Blocking The Courts: The Trump Triple Threat, Joanne Doroshow
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Shrinkage Estimation In The Adjudication Of Civil Damage Claims, Hillel J. Bavli, Yang Chen
Shrinkage Estimation In The Adjudication Of Civil Damage Claims, Hillel J. Bavli, Yang Chen
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Recent papers have highlighted the use of claim aggregation as a tool for reducing the unpredictability of legal outcomes. Specifically, it has been argued that sampling methods can be used in the class action context, and comparable-case guidance – information regarding awards in comparable cases as guidance for determining damage awards – can be used in the individual-claim context, to reduce variability and improve the accuracy of awards. In this paper, we examine a third form of claim aggregation based on a statistical method called “shrinkage estimation,” which is used to aggregate information and thereby improve estimation. We examine the …