Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (2)
- ADEA (1)
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (1)
- Anderson v. S.U.N.Y. Health Science Center (1)
- BFOQ (1)
-
- Bona fide occupational qualification (1)
- Carlson v. green (1)
- Carney v. Martin Luther Home (1)
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts Inc. (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Commercial interests (1)
- Damages (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Direct evidence (1)
- Dislike (1)
- Disparate impact (1)
- Disparate impact theory (1)
- Disparate treatment (1)
- Doctor Martin Luther King (1)
- Dr. Martin Luther King (1)
- Due process (1)
- Dunn v. hovic (1)
- ERISA (1)
- Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Environment (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Environmental injustice (1)
- Environmental justice (1)
- Environmental racism (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Punitive Damages--Developments In Section 1983 Cases, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Punitive Damages--Developments In Section 1983 Cases, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Ethics, The Legacy Of The Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr., And The Movement Toward Environmental Justice, Beverly Mcqueary Smith
Ethics, The Legacy Of The Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr., And The Movement Toward Environmental Justice, Beverly Mcqueary Smith
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Employment Discrimination: Recent Developments In The Supreme Court, Eileen Kaufman
Employment Discrimination: Recent Developments In The Supreme Court, Eileen Kaufman
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
How Radical Is Lani Guinier?, Michael Lewyn
Condescending Contradictions: Richard Posner's Pragmatism And Pregnancy Discrimination, Ann C. Mcginley, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Condescending Contradictions: Richard Posner's Pragmatism And Pregnancy Discrimination, Ann C. Mcginley, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Richard Posner’s, the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, judicial actions have been criticized, primarily for inconsistently commingling economic analysis with other approaches to decisionmaking in an effort to reach personally pleasing results that are at odds with Posner's professed commitment to methodological rigor. Although criticism of Posner's judging is diverse, a common theme is that he too frequently marshals his argumentative force merely to uphold the economic rights of the powerful. In other words, according to the critics, after the rush of intellectual excitement subsides, litigants and the justice system are left …