Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Chilling: The Constitutional Implications Of Body-Worn Cameras And Facial Recognition Technology At Public Protests, Julian R. Murphy
Chilling: The Constitutional Implications Of Body-Worn Cameras And Facial Recognition Technology At Public Protests, Julian R. Murphy
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
In recent years body-worn cameras have been championed by community groups, scholars, and the courts as a potential check on police misconduct. Such has been the enthusiasm for body-worn cameras that, in a relatively short time, they have been rolled out to police departments across the country. Perhaps because of the optimism surrounding these devices there has been little consideration of the Fourth Amendment issues they pose, especially when they are coupled with facial recognition technology (FRT). There is one particular context in which police use of FRT equipped body-worn cameras is especially concerning: public protests. This Comment constitutes the …
Preventing An Air Panopticon: A Proposal For Reasonable Legal Restrictions On Aerial Surveillance, Jake Laperruque
Preventing An Air Panopticon: A Proposal For Reasonable Legal Restrictions On Aerial Surveillance, Jake Laperruque
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Missouri Citizen’S Guide To Red Light Cameras, Joe Conlon
A Missouri Citizen’S Guide To Red Light Cameras, Joe Conlon
Missouri Law Review
Red light cameras are a hotly debated issue in Missouri. Many supporters argue that red light cameras reduce accidents and save lives.1 Those opposed claim the cameras do more harm than good.2 This Summary provides a brief background on red light cameras and their early use in Missouri. This Summary then discusses the recent development in red light camera laws, including the string of recent Missouri court cases dealing with the issue, as well as proposed state legislation. Finally, this Summary discusses possible legal arguments one can present in court in the event that he or she is accused of …
One More Good Reason For In-Car Videotaping Of Traffic Stops: An Accurate Assessment Of "Consent", Robert L. White
One More Good Reason For In-Car Videotaping Of Traffic Stops: An Accurate Assessment Of "Consent", Robert L. White
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat
There are a number of reasons why legislative reform mandating the use of in-car cameras in police cruisers would benefit the criminal justice system in Illinois. In-car cameras provide evidence for cases involving traffic violations or intoxicated motorists. They produce instantly available training materials. They also assist victims of police misconduct, as well as officers defending themselves against misconduct claims. This Comment looks to add to this list of benefits the role in-car cameras can play in assessing the validity of consents to search that officers obtain during traffic stops.
Of Cameras And Courtrooms, Alex Kozinski, Robert Johnson
Of Cameras And Courtrooms, Alex Kozinski, Robert Johnson
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Avoiding And Resolving Disputes During Sports Competition: Of Cameras And Computers , James A.R. Nafziger
Avoiding And Resolving Disputes During Sports Competition: Of Cameras And Computers , James A.R. Nafziger
Marquette Sports Law Review
No abstract provided.
Framing The Issues For Cameras In The Courtrooms: Redefining Judicial Dignity And Decorum, A Wayne Mackay
Framing The Issues For Cameras In The Courtrooms: Redefining Judicial Dignity And Decorum, A Wayne Mackay
Dalhousie Law Journal
This article examines the role of s. 2(b) of the Charter of Rights in determining the role of cameras in Canadian courtrooms. The discussions reveal that arguments in opposition to cameras are largely unfounded and in contradiction to the freedom of expression guarantee. The denial of the right is in reality based on judges' and lawyers' fear of loss of control of the courtroom environment. Cameras should only be banned from courtrooms as part of a total publication ban, and then only after a careful s. 1 analysis
Canon 35: Cameras, Courts And Confusion, Harold D. Rogers
Canon 35: Cameras, Courts And Confusion, Harold D. Rogers
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Quasi-Contracts -- Contracts Unenforceable Under Statute Of Frauds -- Test Of Benefits, Charles C. Spangenberg
Quasi-Contracts -- Contracts Unenforceable Under Statute Of Frauds -- Test Of Benefits, Charles C. Spangenberg
Michigan Law Review
Defendant orally contracted to buy fifty special type motion picture cameras which plaintiff was to build. Plaintiff had completed ten cameras in whole and forty in part when defendant repudiated, setting up the defense that the contract was void under the California statute of frauds. In an action on the common counts for labor done and materials furnished, the court held, that plaintiff could not recover because defendant had accepted or retained no benefit from which a promise to pay could be implied. Mitchell Camera Corp. v. Fox Film Corp., (Cal. 1936) 59 P. (2d) 127.