Law Commons^™

The Smallpox Vaccination Campaign Of 2003: Why Did It Failand What Are The Lessons For Bioterrorism Preparedness?, Edward P. Richards, Katharine C. Rathbun, Jay Gold

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Foia And Fighting Terror: The Elusive Nexus Between Public Access And Terrorist Attack, James T. O'Reilly

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Too Strange To Be Just Fiction: Legal Lessons From A Bioterrorist Simulation, The Case Of Topoff 2, John D. Blum

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Detaining Combatants By Law Or By Order? The Rule Of Lawmaking In The War On Terrorists, Peter Raven-Hansen

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Military Intelligence In Homeland Security, Stephen Dycus

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Normalization Of Homeland Security After September 11: The Role Of The Military In Counterterrorism Preparedness And Response, William C. Banks

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Rational Constitutional Faith: Remarks In Response To Professor Amsterdam, Eric M. Freedman

Hofstra Law Review

There are a few substantive thoughts about the future that I wanted to share before letting you get acquainted with each other at the reception. But in order to talk about the future, I will have to go back to the past.

On a beautiful spring day, April 5, 1588, there was a young woman in an advanced state of pregnancy strolling along a beach on the south coast of England when she had an experience that is directly comparable to sitting in your office at the World Trade Center and seeing an airplane heading for your window. She saw …

Terrorism On Trial: The Trials Of Al Qaeda, Andrew C. Mccarthy

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

The New Post 9/11 America Or The Making Of King George: A Review Of Executive Power In The Effort To Combat Global Terrorism As It Relates To The Power Of The Purse, Woodrow E. Turner

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Foreword: Terrorism On Trial, Michael P. Scharf, Amy E. Miller

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

A Thorn On The Tulip - A Scottish Trial In The Netherlands: The Story Behind The Lockerbie Trial, David R. Andrews

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

The Legal Case Against The Global War On Terror, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

Defining Terrorism As The Peacetime Equivalent Of War Crimes: Problems And Prospects, Michael P. Scharf

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

Merging International Human Rights Law With Personal Injury Law In The Fight Against Terrorism, Allan Gerson

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

On Military Commissions, Scott L. Silliman

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

Terrorism: The Persistent Dilemma Of Legitimacy, M. Cherif Bassiouni

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

Lesser Evils In The War On Terrorism, Mark A. Drumbl

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

State Actors In An International Definition Of Terrorism From A Human Rights Perspective, Bruce Broomhall

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

Leaving Wonderland: Distinguishing Terrorism From Other Types Of Crime, Jonathan Leiken

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

The Trials Of Al Qaeda: Federal Court Vs. Military Commission, Toni Locy

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

Constructing Good Aliens And Good Citizens: Legitimizing The War On Terror(Ism), Karen Engle

University of Colorado Law Review

No abstract provided.

Checks And Balances In Wartime: American British And Israeli Experiences, Stephen J. Schulhofer

Michigan Law Review

Three years after an attack that traumatized the nation and prompted massive military and law-enforcement counter-measures, we continue to wrestle with the central dilemma of the rule of law. Which is more to be feared - the danger of unchecked executive and military power, or the danger of terrorist attacks that only an unconstrained executive could prevent? Posed in varying configurations, the question has already generated extensive litigation since September 11, 2001, and a dozen major appellate rulings. Last Term's Supreme Court trilogy - Rasul v. Bush, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Rumsfeld v. Padilla - clarified several important points …