Law Commons^™

Chilled Bird: Freedom Of Expression In The Eighties, Kenneth E. Kulzick, Amy D. Hogue

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Offer Sheet: An Attempt To Circumvent Ncaa Prohibition Of Representational Contracts, Joseph Michael Manisco

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sailing The Uncharted Seas Of Asbestos Litigation Under The Longshoremen's And Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, Samuel J. Smith, Stephen J. Birek Jr.

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tax Benefit Rule As Applied To Corporate Liquidations And Contributions To Capital: Recent Developments, Eric J. Byrne

Notre Dame Law Review

No abstract provided.

Private Housing For The Disabled: A Suggested Agenda, Roger W. Andersen

Notre Dame Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Psychiatrist, The Sociopath And The Courts: New Lines For An Old Battle, Gerald F. Uelmen

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments In Corporate And Securities Laws, Business And Corporations Law Section, Los Angeles County Bar Association

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cramer V.Tyars: An Anomaly In California Civil Commitment Case Law, Dina Tecimer

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Right Of Publicity As A Means Of Protecting Performers' Style, Marla E. Levine

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Essay--Prejudgment Attachments And The Concept Of The Neutral Magistrate: A Tale Of Two Cases, James Audley Mclaughlin

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reflections On The Rule Against Hearsay, Irving Younger

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Winter 1980

Transcript

No abstract provided.

Equality And Community: Lessons From The Civil Rights Era, Kenneth L. Karst

Notre Dame Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Future Of The Radio Format Change Controversy: The Case For The Competitive Marketplace, David M. Griffith

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Salt Newsletter, Vol. 1980, No. 2

SALT Equalizer

President's Column, at 1.

Judge Harry Edwards is 1980 SALT Awardee, at 2.

Thelton Henderson Appointed United States District Judge, at 2.

SALT Board Meets on the West Coast, at 2.

Ralph Brown and Barbara Babcock Named Vice-Presidents, at 2.

SALT Files Amicus Brief in DeRonde V. Regents, at 2.

Dues Notice, at 3.

Introduction, Joseph Schneider

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity: A Sane Approach, Barbara A. Weiner

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Buyer Protection In The Sale Of New Housing In Illinois: The Implied Warranty Of Habitability , Michael Dolesh

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Caveat Lender - Federal Securities Law Does Not Apply To A Commercial Loan Secured By A Pledge Of Securities , Vincent A. Lavieri

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Disparate Dress Codes As Sex Discrimination In Violation Of Title Vii , Susan Hillary Loeb

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Comments On "A Specialized Statutory Immigration Court", James J. Orlow

San Diego Law Review

Continuing in the critique of Mr. Roberts' proposal for the creation of an independent article I immigration court, the author argues that, while Mr. Roberts presents salient points, his proposal is inappropriate except to the extent that the adjudicative process can be separated from the enforcement agency. The author argues that an independent immigration court would over-judicialize the immigration process, and further argues that such a court would not be vested with judicial authority pursuant to the constitution.

The Need For A Specialized Immigration Court: A Practical Response, Leon Wildes

San Diego Law Review

The author agrees with Mr. Roberts' premise that change is needed in the adjudicatory process of immigration cases, but argues that less radical changes would better serve to overcome the present inadequacies of the system, while limiting the creation of new problems. The author argues that a better solution would be to transfer the adjudicatory role to a separate administrative court, under the Administrative Procedures Act. The author further argues that the adoption of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedures or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to provide for a fair hearing, as well as securing adequate funding for …

United Steelworkers Of America V. Weber: An Exercise In Understandable Indecision, George Schatzki

Washington Law Review

It is well known to those involved in the world of employment-discrimination law that in 1974 the United Steelworkers of America and Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation entered into a collective-bargaining agreement which provided for a new on-the-job training program designed solely to correct the virtually total absence of blacks in Kaiser's craft workforce. Fifty percent of the trainees were to be black. Brian Weber, a white production worker who failed to obtain a position in the program, instituted a class action suit alleging that the affirmative action plan discriminated against him and his white colleagues in violation of Title …

Void-For-Vagueness—Judicial Response To Allegedly Vague Statutes—State V. Zuanich, 92 Wn. 2d 61, 593 P.2d 1314 (1979), Jeffrey Merle Evans

Washington Law Review

In light of the problematic nature of the void-for-vagueness doctrine, this note argues that a defendant should never have standing to challenge a statute as unconstitutionally vague unless sufficient facts have been established to allow the court to review the statute in its actual application to the defendant. If, however, Washington courts insist upon reviewing a challenged statute on its face, they should be alert to the possibility that judicial review under the void-for-vagueness doctrine will become unduly expansive. This note suggests that courts can minimize potential abuse by carefully framing the constitutional issue and by appropriately construing the challenged …

Investor Protection And The Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, Mary E. Brumder

Washington Law Review

The 1976 ULPA is a definite improvement over the 1916 ULPA. The new Act, however, makes only slight changes in one of the important and problematic parts of the old Act—the role of limited partners. As it is likely that a number of legislatures will consider adoption of the 1976 ULPA in the near future, this comment is written to provide guidance in the area of the limited partner's role. After examining the role of the limited partner as it has evolved within the structure of the 1916 ULPA, this comment discusses changes made by the 1976 ULPA and recommends …

Toward A Theory Of Rights For The Employment Relation, Robert Brousseau

Washington Law Review

It is my argument that much thinking in the area of labor law has been grafted upon an individualistic stock where it ought not grow; in fact, the considerations embodied in that diverse corpus we call labor law draw heavily upon a tradition of collective jurisprudence, and it is in collective terms that we ought to seek the solution of concrete cases. I shall attempt first to demonstrate the disarray in the treatment of labor rights, to show the origins of the conflict between collective and individualistic traditions, and then to propose a mode of analysis for the reconciliation of …

Void-For-Vagueness—Judicial Response To Allegedly Vague Statutes—State V. Zuanich, 92 Wn. 2d 61, 593 P.2d 1314 (1979), Jeffrey Merle Evans

Washington Law Review

In light of the problematic nature of the void-for-vagueness doctrine, this note argues that a defendant should never have standing to challenge a statute as unconstitutionally vague unless sufficient facts have been established to allow the court to review the statute in its actual application to the defendant. If, however, Washington courts insist upon reviewing a challenged statute on its face, they should be alert to the possibility that judicial review under the void-for-vagueness doctrine will become unduly expansive. This note suggests that courts can minimize potential abuse by carefully framing the constitutional issue and by appropriately construing the challenged …

Corporations—Conditional Supermajority Provisions: Protecting Shareholders' Interests—Seibert V. Gulton Industries, Inc., No. 5631 (Del. Ch. June 21, 1979), Aff'd, No. 219 (Del. Jan. 4, 1980), Constance M. Crawley

Washington Law Review

In Seibert v. Gulton Industries, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of a complaint challenging the legality of a conditional supermajority amendment to Gulton Industries' certificate of incorporation. The challenged amendment required the affirmative vote of eighty percent of Gulton's shareholders to approve a proposed takeover of Gulton by any person or entity that had acquired five percent or more of Gulton's shares prior to its proposed takeover. The eighty percent vote was not required if Gulton's directors had approved the proposed takeover prior to the other entity's acquisition of a five percent interest in Gulton. In such …

United Steelworkers Of America V. Weber: An Exercise In Understandable Indecision, George Schatzki

Washington Law Review

It is well known to those involved in the world of employment-discrimination law that in 1974 the United Steelworkers of America and Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation entered into a collective-bargaining agreement which provided for a new on-the-job training program designed solely to correct the virtually total absence of blacks in Kaiser's craft workforce. Fifty percent of the trainees were to be black. Brian Weber, a white production worker who failed to obtain a position in the program, instituted a class action suit alleging that the affirmative action plan discriminated against him and his white colleagues in violation of Title …

Excusable Nonperformance In Sales Contracts: Some Thoughts About Risk Management, Richard E. Speidel

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.