Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

Journal

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Parent and Child

Articles 1 - 19 of 19

Full-Text Articles in Law

Why The American Child Welfare System Is Not Child Centered, Richard J. Gelles Mar 2016

Why The American Child Welfare System Is Not Child Centered, Richard J. Gelles

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


The Impact Of Liberal Ideology On Child Protection Reform, Cassie Statuto Bevan Mar 2016

The Impact Of Liberal Ideology On Child Protection Reform, Cassie Statuto Bevan

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


Diagnosing Liberal Resistance To Needed Child Welfare Reforms, James G. Dwyer Mar 2016

Diagnosing Liberal Resistance To Needed Child Welfare Reforms, James G. Dwyer

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


Thoughts On The Liberal Dilemma In Child Welfare Reform, Elizabeth Bartholet Mar 2016

Thoughts On The Liberal Dilemma In Child Welfare Reform, Elizabeth Bartholet

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


Child Protection’S Parental Preference, Daniel Heimpel Mar 2016

Child Protection’S Parental Preference, Daniel Heimpel

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


Stanley V. Illinois’S Untold Story, Josh Gupta-Kagan Mar 2016

Stanley V. Illinois’S Untold Story, Josh Gupta-Kagan

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Stanley v. Illinois is one of the Supreme Court’s more curious landmark cases. The holding is well known: the Due Process Clause both prohibits states from removing children from the care of unwed fathers simply because they are not married and requires states to provide all parents with a hearing on their fitness. By recognizing strong due process protections for parents’ rights, Stanley reaffirmed Lochner-era cases that had been in doubt and formed the foundation of modern constitutional family law. But Peter Stanley never raised due process arguments, so it has long been unclear how the Court reached this decision. …


To Cut Or Not To Cut?: Addressing Proposals To Ban Circumcision Under Both A Parental Rights Theory And Child-Centered Perspective In The Specific Context Of Jewish And Muslim Infants, Andrew E. Behrns Mar 2013

To Cut Or Not To Cut?: Addressing Proposals To Ban Circumcision Under Both A Parental Rights Theory And Child-Centered Perspective In The Specific Context Of Jewish And Muslim Infants, Andrew E. Behrns

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


Teens, Sexts, & Cyberspace: The Constitutional Implications Of Current Sexting & Cyberbullying Laws, Jamie L. Williams Mar 2012

Teens, Sexts, & Cyberspace: The Constitutional Implications Of Current Sexting & Cyberbullying Laws, Jamie L. Williams

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


Form And Substance In Parentage Law, Lynn D. Wardle Oct 2006

Form And Substance In Parentage Law, Lynn D. Wardle

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


Parentage At Birth: Birthfathers And Social Fatherhood, Nancy E. Dowd Feb 2006

Parentage At Birth: Birthfathers And Social Fatherhood, Nancy E. Dowd

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


A Child-Centered Approach To Parentage Law, James G. Dwyer Feb 2006

A Child-Centered Approach To Parentage Law, James G. Dwyer

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


The Constitutionality Of Best Interests Parentage, David D. Meyer Feb 2006

The Constitutionality Of Best Interests Parentage, David D. Meyer

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


To Protect And Defend: Assigning Parental Rights When Parents Are In Poverty, Karen Czapanskiy Feb 2006

To Protect And Defend: Assigning Parental Rights When Parents Are In Poverty, Karen Czapanskiy

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


What The Supreme Court Could Learn About The Child Online Protection Act By Reading Playboy, Shaun Richardson Dec 2003

What The Supreme Court Could Learn About The Child Online Protection Act By Reading Playboy, Shaun Richardson

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Due to the ease of Internet searching, Congress has passed the Child Online Protection Act to protect children from sexually explicit material. Although the Supreme Court has not directly decided the issue, it has hinted that the Act may survive a First Amendment challenge. In this Note, the author argues reasons why the Act should not survive a First Amendment challenge, and that measures such as parental empowerment via government-facilitated use of Internet filtering software are preferable


Parental Autonomy And Children's Welfare, Elizabeth S. Scott Apr 2003

Parental Autonomy And Children's Welfare, Elizabeth S. Scott

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


Rights And Duties Of Childrearing, Peter Vallentyne Apr 2003

Rights And Duties Of Childrearing, Peter Vallentyne

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


A Taxonomy Of Children's Existing Rights In State Decision Making About Their Relationships, James G. Dwyer Apr 2003

A Taxonomy Of Children's Existing Rights In State Decision Making About Their Relationships, James G. Dwyer

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


Which Ties Bind? Redefining The Parent-Child Relationship In An Age Of Genetic Certainty, June Carbone, Naomi Cahn Apr 2003

Which Ties Bind? Redefining The Parent-Child Relationship In An Age Of Genetic Certainty, June Carbone, Naomi Cahn

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.


What If I Want My Kids To Watch Pornography?: Protecting Children From "Indecent" Speech, Ashutosh Bhagwat Feb 2003

What If I Want My Kids To Watch Pornography?: Protecting Children From "Indecent" Speech, Ashutosh Bhagwat

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Under current First Amendment doctrine, a law directed at indecent speech is treated as "content-based" regulation of speech, and thus must satisfy the "strict scrutiny" test to survive constitutional challenge - the regulation must be narrowly tailored to advance a compelling state interest. A number of laws regulating indecent speech have been passed in recent years, and when challenged, the government has defended these regulations on the ground that the State has a compelling interest in the protection of children from harmful materials. Underlying this argument, however, is a deep ambiguity regarding the precise nature of the government's legitimate objectives …