Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Some Observations About The Turn Toward Federal Rulemaking In Health Law, John M. Griesbach
Some Observations About The Turn Toward Federal Rulemaking In Health Law, John M. Griesbach
Saint Louis University Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Regulating What’S Not Real: Federal Regulation In The Aftermath Of Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition, Kate Dugan
Regulating What’S Not Real: Federal Regulation In The Aftermath Of Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition, Kate Dugan
Saint Louis University Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence And The Scope Of Article Iii--A View From The Federalist, Michael G. Collins
Judicial Independence And The Scope Of Article Iii--A View From The Federalist, Michael G. Collins
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Bean: Shoveling After The Elephant., Pannal Alan Sanders
United States V. Bean: Shoveling After The Elephant., Pannal Alan Sanders
St. Mary's Law Journal
Over the years Congress has enacted and amended several versions of the United States Code (U.S.C) § 925(c). Several reported cases illustrate the courts’ early efforts to develop a coherent body of jurisprudence with respect to the procedural and substantive aspects of U.S.C. § 925(c) judicial review. Specifically, the § 925(c) denials of relief by the Director before the congressional appropriations ban commenced in 1993. Although the methodology and reasoning behind these decisions differ in their details, several themes are discernable. First, even without the express provisions for judicial review added by the Firearms Owners Protection Act (FOPA), courts consistently …
Every Day Is A Good Day For A Judge To Lay Down His Professional Life For Justice , Jack B. Weinstein
Every Day Is A Good Day For A Judge To Lay Down His Professional Life For Justice , Jack B. Weinstein
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article discusses the notion that a judge’s obligation to obey precedent should, if circumstances require, be overridden in an effort to oppose gross injustices and violations. Even in the face of critisicim and outrage, judges, because of their intimate knowledge of the system and unique vantage point, have a duty to speak out against any law that they find morally repugnant and to expose injustices wherever they can. The article analyses the various actions that judges may take to avoid enforcing laws that they believe to be fundamentally unjust, including the option of resignation and the power of lower …