Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Draft Of Beck Speech - 2010, Wendy J. Gordon
Draft Of Beck Speech - 2010, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
I come here with a sense of gratitude, to the intellectually stimulating BU community of students, staff and faculty, that has taught me so much, and grateful today especially to those who made this event possible. I would like to thank you all for coming, thank Dean O'Rourke for hosting this wonderful event, Mary Gallagher and Cornell Stinson for organizing it, and most especially I thank Phil Beck for his generosity to the Boston University School of Law in funding this Chair. It's immensely flattering to me having been chosen the initial recipient, and flattering to the school that Phil …
Truth And Consequences - Draft - 01-07-1993, Wendy J. Gordon
Truth And Consequences - Draft - 01-07-1993, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
Rather, he seeks to extract something from the victim that is properly the victim's, usually money, or to make the victim do something (e.g., sleep with him) that is ordinarily a behavior that the victim is at liberty not to engage in. The missing "rights" that Murphy seeks are therefore present and fairly uncontroversial: the rights not to have one's goods intentionally taken, or have one's liberty intentionally infringed, without justification. It is irrelevant whether or not it would be proper for the blackmailer to disclose the information, and thus destroy something the victim may value at a price even …
Blackmail: Deontology - 1993, Wendy J. Gordon
Blackmail: Deontology - 1993, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
The basic logic of my deontologic approach is this.
Notes Of Reference To The Common Law, Wendy J. Gordon
Notes Of Reference To The Common Law, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
Also, when one looks at the common law, one finds throughout an attempt to protect persons who change position in reliance on other's actions from being harmed by such persons' withdrawal; similarly, the common law gives a great deal of protection from harm even when the parties have had no prior dealings.
Note On General Conclusion - 1986, Wendy J. Gordon
Note On General Conclusion - 1986, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
The burden of the first part of this paper has been to suggest that tort law provides us no self-justifying notion of "wrongs" by which we can allocate rights and duties. The burden of the second part of this paper has been to suggest that contract law's notion of "consent" is similarly unable to provide justification for any particular system of rights. How would one go about constructing a theory by which to evaluate whether a given property system could be justified? A full answer to that question is surely outside the scope of this paper, but some basic points …