Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Patents (2)
- 1st Amendment (1)
- ADR (1)
- Alternative dispute resolution (1)
- Arbitration (1)
-
- Attorney-Client (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Commercial speech (1)
- Compromise (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Decision Making (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Legal Ethics (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Liability (1)
- Mediation (1)
- Patent disputes (1)
- Patent term (1)
- Prediction of outcomes (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Research & development (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Moral Labyrinth Of Zealous Advocacy, James R. Elkins
The Moral Labyrinth Of Zealous Advocacy, James R. Elkins
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Trashing The Constitution: Judicial Activism, The Dormant Commerce Clause, And The Federalism Mantra, Patrick Mcginley
Trashing The Constitution: Judicial Activism, The Dormant Commerce Clause, And The Federalism Mantra, Patrick Mcginley
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Practical Reason: The Commercial Speech Paradigm, Edward J. Eberle
Practical Reason: The Commercial Speech Paradigm, Edward J. Eberle
Law Faculty Scholarship
First Amendment jurisprudence incorporates a continual struggle to balance coflicting interests. Free speech values must be weighed against communitarian interests in a rational manner. The article examines the foundationalist approach to this task, and finds it incapable of providing a unified First Amendment theory. Through examination of the treatment of commercial speech, the article arrives at a more coherent approach through the application of practical reasoning. The proposed methodology allows for principled analysis and decisions which yield an internally consistent body of law.
Prospects For Adr In Patent Disputes: An Empirical Assessment Of Attorneys' Attitudes, Thomas G. Field Jr., Michael Rose
Prospects For Adr In Patent Disputes: An Empirical Assessment Of Attorneys' Attitudes, Thomas G. Field Jr., Michael Rose
Law Faculty Scholarship
For the most part, parties with a legal dispute have either settled their differences or, when that wasn't possible, litigated them. However, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is increasingly urged as a supplement or substitute in a wide range of areas. ADR usually involves at least one third party who is employed by neither the judicial system nor one of the parties to the dispute. The third party may be a mediator, who helps the parties reach settlement, or an arbitrator, who renders a decision. While arbitration has been widely used for many years, until very recently, mediation (or conciliation) was …
Comment: Perceptions Of Chief Patent Counsel At Large Corporations Of The Effects Of Patent Term, Products Liability And Government Regulations On Firm R&D, Thomas G. Field Jr.
Comment: Perceptions Of Chief Patent Counsel At Large Corporations Of The Effects Of Patent Term, Products Liability And Government Regulations On Firm R&D, Thomas G. Field Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarship
Last summer, over 300 members of the Association of (chief) Corporate Patent Counsel were surveyed concerning their attitude toward and experience with arbitration and mediation (ADR). Seventy-five responded. Subsequently, tabulations of the survey data were sent to the same people with four additional questions, two of which had nothing to do with ADR. Forty-one responded. This comment reports responses to the two questions unrelated to ADR.
Lawyer Decision Making: The Problem Of Prediction, Marjorie Mcdiarmid
Lawyer Decision Making: The Problem Of Prediction, Marjorie Mcdiarmid
Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines three competing models for lawyer decision making. Reviewing literature drawn from other disciplines, Professor McDiarmid applies each model to a particular lawyer decision task and provides a critique both of applicability and of the underlying assumptions of the models themselves. The Article concentrates on the problem of prediction in the face of uncertainty.