Law Commons^™

Compelled Lawyer Representation And The Free Speech Rights Of Attorneys, Leora Harpaz

Faculty Scholarship

This Article examines the Supreme Court's decision in Hurley v. Irish-American and compares it to the decision in Stropnicky v. Nathanson. It then considers whether there are sufficient distinctions between the two cases so as to defeat the First Amendment argument that was successful in Hurley. It concludes that the differences between the two cases are not sufficiently significant from the point of view of the First Amendment and that the application of the state public accommodation statute to a lawyer's ideologically motivated decision not to represent a client violates the First Amendment.

Constitutional Qualms Concerning: Government Restrictions On Tobacco Product Advertising, Barbara A. Noah

Faculty Scholarship

This Article evaluates the constitutionality of a representative series of congressional proposals to limit tobacco advertising. Federal legislation codifying the tobacco settlement included possible restrictions on outdoor advertising, a prohibition on the use of cartoon images, permitting only tombstone format for advertisements in publications that target a youth audience, a prohibition on the sale or gift of promotional items bearing tobacco product names or logos, a ban on industry sponsorship of sporting and other cultural events, and restrictions on Internet promotions. The Author suggests that upon seeking to prevent tobacco companies from encouraging illegal tobacco use by minors, the FDA's …

Banking In North America: The Triumph Of Public Choice Over Public Policy, Eric J. Gouvin

Faculty Scholarship

This Article examines the state of cross-border banking in the NAFTA countries and the question of whether member country banks should be permitted to branch freely throughout North America. Under present law, the United States permits foreign banks to branch into its territory subject to extensive restrictions, Canada has indicated that it plans to eliminate some restrictions on foreign branching, and Mexico continues to permit access to its banking markets only by investment in or establishment of an institution chartered in Mexico. Article 1403(3) of the NAFTA left the issue of cross-border branching open to subsequent negotiation. If the decision …

Reflections On Twenty Years Of The Law Review, Howard Kalodner

Faculty Scholarship

The Author reflects on twenty years of working with the Western New England Law Review. Up until his arrival as dean of the law school, the College was unwilling,or at least reluctant, to provide the necessary funds for publication of a law review.

Moving Violations: An Examination Of The Broad Preemptive Effect Of The Carmack Amendment, Jeanne M. Kaiser

Faculty Scholarship

This Article addresses the general principles of preemption, and describes the history, purpose and language of the Carmack Amendment. The Article then demonstrates that at the time the amendment was passed, Congress had no intention of preempting claims based on moving industry misconduct. Part II discusses the constitutional principles that govern application of the law of federal preemption and describes how application of preemption in Carmack Amendment cases has diverged from the overall application of preemption principles in other areas of congressional legislation. Finally, Part III argues that the courts have improperly granted the moving industry carte blanche to deceive …

Lawyers' Identities, Client Selection And The Antidiscrimination Principle: Thoughts On The Sanctioning Of Judith Nathanson, Bruce K. Miller

Faculty Scholarship

The Author discusses how the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination might justifiably apply the Public Accommodations Statute to the client selection practices of some, perhaps many, lawyers. But it should leave Judith Nathanson alone. Nathanson's decision to represent only women in divorce cases is protected by the First Amendment, not because she is entitled as a lawyer to indulge whatever biases she chooses in her selection of clients, but because, as a lawyer of integrity who has melded her personal values and professional skills in service to the profession's best ideals, she is entitled to represent her chosen clients as she …

Lawyer Discrimination Against Clients: Outright Rejection--No; Limitations On Issues And Arguments-Yes, Sam Stonefield

Faculty Scholarship

The issue of lawyer discrimination brings new perspectives to traditional topics like the practice of law, the role of the lawyer and the relationship with, and rights of, the client. It forces us to examine the nature of lawyer discretion, the limits of that discretion and the consequences of trying to regulate that discretion. The examinationis a daunting task. This essay offers an approach that attempts to protect both the prohibition against discrimination and the practice of law and to accommodate the tension that necessarily accompanies this effort. It suggests that the best solution is to prohibit lawyers from discriminating …

Racial Disparities In The Delivery Of Health Care, Barbara A. Noah

Faculty Scholarship

This Article focuses on the role of conscious and unconscious racial bias in the delivery of care; it does not begin to address the larger issue of inadequate access to care at the outset. Improving access to health care for minorities will undoubtedly have a positive effect on these groups' overall health status; however, to the extent that racial bias in the delivery of care exists apart from problems of inadequate access, the disparity in health status between whites and African Americans will no doubt continue.

Part II of this Article describes racial disparities in a variety of health care …

Comment On The Supplemental-Jurisdiction Statute: 28 U.S.C. § 1367, Arthur D. Wolf

Faculty Scholarship

This Article discusses the supplemental-jurisdiction statute of 1990, 28 U.S.C. § 1367, which has generated more commentary than perhaps any other jurisdictional section. Together, § 1331, which traces its history to the Judiciary Act of 1875, and § 1332, which dates back to the Judiciary Act of 1789, did not undoubtedly promote more examination in their first eight years of existence. One might speculate why § 1367 has been the focus of so much commentary, largely critical: critical of the speed with which § 1367 was enacted, critical of the narrow range of persons involved in its drafting, critical of …