Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (382)
- Legal Profession (374)
- Supreme Court of the United States (9)
- Legislation (4)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
-
- Criminal Law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Air and Space Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (10)
- Antitrust law (2)
- Law and legislation (2)
- NCAA (2)
- NIL (2)
-
- Civil procedure (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Class action suits (1)
- Clean Air Act (1)
- Coerced confessions (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
- Coronavirus pandemic (1)
- Corporate governance (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Criminal prosecution (1)
- DNA evidence (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- ERISA (1)
- Education (1)
- Education law (1)
- Election law (1)
- Employee retirement plans (1)
- Employment law (1)
- Environmental Protection Agency (1)
- Environmental law (1)
- Equitable apportionment (1)
- Evictions (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 394
Full-Text Articles in Law
Social Media On Trial: How The Supreme Court Could Permanently Alter The Future Of The Internet By Limiting Section 230'S Broad Immunity Shield, J. Tyler Wampler
Social Media On Trial: How The Supreme Court Could Permanently Alter The Future Of The Internet By Limiting Section 230'S Broad Immunity Shield, J. Tyler Wampler
Tennessee Law Review
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has allowed the internet to develop and flourish at an unprecedent pace. The law has been interpreted broadly to grant immunity to interactive computer services like social media platforms from liability for content posted by users. Wielding this immunity, internet platforms are empowered to act innovatively without fear of frivolous lawsuits. However, there are ongoing concerns that this broad interpretation shields modern tech companies from liability for actions that were never intended to be protected.
Two companion cases interpreting Section 230 are currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, where the Court is being …
Alabama Association Of Realtors V. Department Of Health And Human Services, Adam B. Mcdonald
Alabama Association Of Realtors V. Department Of Health And Human Services, Adam B. Mcdonald
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dobbs V. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Anna Grace Cole
Dobbs V. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Anna Grace Cole
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Election Commission V. Cruz, Myles A. Roth
Federal Election Commission V. Cruz, Myles A. Roth
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ford Motor Company V. Montana Eighth Judicial District, Maddie Rudge
Ford Motor Company V. Montana Eighth Judicial District, Maddie Rudge
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc V. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Davis Capps
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc V. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Davis Capps
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hughes V. Northwestern University, Nicole S. Roth
Hughes V. Northwestern University, Nicole S. Roth
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Google Llc V. Oracle America, Inc., Elizabeth Spica
Google Llc V. Oracle America, Inc., Elizabeth Spica
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mississippi V. Tennessee, Jackson W. Welsh
Mississippi V. Tennessee, Jackson W. Welsh
Tennessee Law Review
The Supreme Court's decision in Mississippi v. Tennessee quietly marked a potential turning point for the once antiquated doctrine of equitable apportionment. This doctrine provides a framework for resolving disputes over the allocation of resources, usually water, that cross state boundaries, and has done so since the early 20th century. In this article, we will delve into the history of equitable apportionment, examining its evolution from 1907 to the present day. We explore the key cases that have slowly broadened the doctrine, with a particular focus on Mississippi v. Tennessee and its implications for the future of equitable apportionment. Through …
Ncaa V. Alston (Case Notes), Carson Blakely
Ncaa V. Alston (Case Notes), Carson Blakely
Tennessee Law Review
In August 2013, I was a thirteen-year-old immersed in the world of NCAA Football 14, a popular video game by Electronic Arts (EA). Through my digital replicas and the actual Tennessee Volunteer football players, my friends and I led the Vols to three consecutive BCS National Championships. My fictional character, a top running back, won three Heisman Trophies, which remains my greatest athletic accomplishment to date. Then, EA announced the discontinuation of the NCAA Football franchise, leaving millions of digital coaches, including myself, perplexed.1 Little did I know that the issue at hand was the complex legal realm of Name, …
Ncaa V. Alston, Emma S. Fowler
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association V. Bruen, T.C. Lisle Whitman Ii
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association V. Bruen, T.C. Lisle Whitman Ii
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Perez V. Sturgis Public Schools, Adriana A. Snedaker
Perez V. Sturgis Public Schools, Adriana A. Snedaker
Tennessee Law Review
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act' ("IDEA") is a law that requires all students with disabilities to be provided with a free and appropriate education. 2 More specifically, IDEA "governs how states and public agencies provide early intervention, special education, and related services to" disabled youth. 3 However, the remedies available under IDEA are limited. Common remedies for violations of IDEA include tuition reimbursement, compensatory education, and attorney's fees. 4 Because monetary compensation is not available under IDEA, disabled students often have to bring a claim under other federal statutes, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") in order …
Vega V. Tekoh, Elizabeth M. Hudson
West Virginia V. Epa, Troy C. Book
Legal Philosophy For Lawyers In The Age Of A Political Supreme Court, Patrick J. Borchers
Legal Philosophy For Lawyers In The Age Of A Political Supreme Court, Patrick J. Borchers
Tennessee Law Review
Legal Philosophy has long been concerned with the question of what brands a norm as legal, as opposed to a non-legal norm of justice or morality. This central question has occupied the attention of philosophers and lawyers for centuries. Roughly speaking, the Naturalist school contends that legal norms are inextricably intertwined with norms of morality and justice (and in its strongest form contends that law-like pronouncements that are immoral or unjust are not fully laws), while the Positivist school argues that a social construct (often called the Rule of Recognition) brands selected norms as legal, and thus legal norms may …
Welcome And Opening Thoughts, Fran Ansley
Dr. Doug Gamble's Comments - Panel 1, Doug Gamble
Dr. Doug Gamble's Comments - Panel 1, Doug Gamble
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Susan Williams's Comments - Panel 1, Susan Williams
Susan Williams's Comments - Panel 1, Susan Williams
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Luvernel Clark's Comments - Panel 1, Luvernel Clark
Luvernel Clark's Comments - Panel 1, Luvernel Clark
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Fran Ansley's Comments, Fran Ansley
Professor Fran Ansley's Comments, Fran Ansley
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The World The Fire Wrought: A Tribute To Fran Ansley - Part 1, Jennifer Gordon
The World The Fire Wrought: A Tribute To Fran Ansley - Part 1, Jennifer Gordon
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Muneer Ahmad's Comments - Panel 2, Muneer Ahmad
Professor Muneer Ahmad's Comments - Panel 2, Muneer Ahmad
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Sherley Cruz's Comments - Panel 2, Sherley Cruz
Professor Sherley Cruz's Comments - Panel 2, Sherley Cruz
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cecilia Prado's Comments - Phase 2, Cecilia Prado
Cecilia Prado's Comments - Phase 2, Cecilia Prado
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dr. Meghan Conley's Comments - Panel 2, Meghan Conley
Dr. Meghan Conley's Comments - Panel 2, Meghan Conley
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jj Rosenbaum's Comments - Panel 2, Jj Rosenbaum
Jj Rosenbaum's Comments - Panel 2, Jj Rosenbaum
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reconstructing The Past And Our Reconstruction Present: The Long Struggle To Teach Divisive Concepts - Panel 3, Robert D. Bland
Reconstructing The Past And Our Reconstruction Present: The Long Struggle To Teach Divisive Concepts - Panel 3, Robert D. Bland
Tennessee Law Review
"In our present moment, as we see just as many signs of a Third 'Redemption,' as we see of a Third Reconstruction, it is important to remember the previous struggles over history and memory ..."