Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- A Nation Without a Supreme Court (1)
- Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. O'Connor (1)
- American Jurisprudence (1)
- Benedict v. Ratner (1)
- Carwile v. Richmond Newspapers (1)
-
- Chaffin v Lynch (1)
- Colley v. Colley (1)
- Confederate (1)
- Doherty & Co. v. Goodman (1)
- Dred Scott (1)
- Earle v. McVeigh (1)
- Foreword (1)
- Fusion of Libel and Slander--Quaere (1)
- Hogan (1)
- Insulting Words Statute (1)
- Jennings v. McDougle (1)
- Koehring v. Bowman (1)
- Martin v. Commonwealth (1)
- McGee v. International Life Insurance (1)
- Moore v. Glatzbach (1)
- Moss v Harwood (1)
- New Tricks For Old Dogs (1)
- Oliver v. Givens Trustee (1)
- Pennoyer v. Neff (1)
- Peter Coogan (1)
- Rask v. American Federation of Labor (1)
- Recent Cases (1)
- Rosenberg v. Craft (1)
- SENATE BILL NO. 266 (1)
- Spiegelman v. Birch (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
New Tricks For Old Dogs, Harry L. Snead Jr.
New Tricks For Old Dogs, Harry L. Snead Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
On the first day of January, 1966, Virginia practitioners will receive a bagful of .new tricks. The UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE becomes effective in Virginia on that day. In adopting the Code during its 1964 legislative session Virginia became the twenty-ninth state to adopt the Code; the Virginia version of the Code follows, with but few exceptions, the official version sponsored by the Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.
Fusion Of Libel And Slander-- Quaere, M. Ray Doubles
Fusion Of Libel And Slander-- Quaere, M. Ray Doubles
University of Richmond Law Review
Are certain written publications which were libelous per se at common law, still actionable as such in Virginia today under a count in common law libel?
Foreword, William T. Muse
Foreword, William T. Muse
University of Richmond Law Review
This issue (the second of Volume 2) contains the first article contributed by an alumnus. The contribution of materials prepared by alumni is welcomed, however it continues to be the policy of the Law Notes that the primary responsibility for articles rests with the Faculty.
Virginia's New "Long Arm" Statute, J. Westwood Smithers
Virginia's New "Long Arm" Statute, J. Westwood Smithers
University of Richmond Law Review
At its recent 1964 session, the General Assembly of Virginia enacted a statute which will widely expand the jurisdiction of our courts over nonresidents. The purpose of this brief editorial is to call attention to the new law, to provide a copy of it for our readers, and to make a few rather cursory comments on its significance.
A Nation Without A Supreme Court, Jose M. Cabanillas
A Nation Without A Supreme Court, Jose M. Cabanillas
University of Richmond Law Review
The Constitution of the Confederate States of America, unanimously adopted on March 11, 1861, by the as- sembled delegates of the original seceding states and on June 19, 1861, by the state of Virginia, was for all practical purposes a copy of the Constitution of the United States. Its judicial provisions begin in Article III with the familiar-sounding phrase "The judicial powers of the Confederate States shall be vested in one supreme court and. . . ." There is no reason to believe that this phraseology was a blind copy of the older document, and that it was not the …
University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents
University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases
University of Richmond Law Review
This article is a summary of the case law that occurred in 1964.