Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

University of Missouri School of Law

Journal

2011

Supreme court

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Mavericks, Moderates, Or Drifters - Supreme Court Voting Alignments, 1838-2009, Christine Kexel Chabot, Benjamin Remy Chabot Nov 2011

Mavericks, Moderates, Or Drifters - Supreme Court Voting Alignments, 1838-2009, Christine Kexel Chabot, Benjamin Remy Chabot

Missouri Law Review

We introduce a new data set recording the vote of every Justice in 18,812 Supreme Court cases decided between 1838 and 1949. When combined with existing data sets, our new data allow us to examine votes in all cases through 2009. We use this data to address previously unanswerable questions about the president's ability to appoint Supreme Court Justices of similar ideology. Surprisingly, history shows that the president's odds of appointing a Justice who sides with appointees of his party have been no better than a coin flip. We find no evidence that divided government at the time of nomination …


Do I Own This Car - The Supreme Court Creates A Standard For Bapcpa Car Ownership, Anne Benton Hucker Nov 2011

Do I Own This Car - The Supreme Court Creates A Standard For Bapcpa Car Ownership, Anne Benton Hucker

Missouri Law Review

The case was Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N.A., and the dispute was whether, under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA), Appellant Jason Ransom should be able to claim a vehicle ownership expense for purposes of Chapter 13 bankruptcy for the unencumbered car that he owned. Practitioners in the bankruptcy field had been watching the progression of this case and were eager to learn the Court's resolution of the issue. The interest was due to two reasons. First, the outcome of the case would affect approximately 250,000 Chapter 13 petitioners. Second, the case would resolve …


Ongoing Confusion Over Ongoing Royalties, The, Mark A. Lemley Jun 2011

Ongoing Confusion Over Ongoing Royalties, The, Mark A. Lemley

Missouri Law Review

In eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the United States Supreme Court correctly concluded that courts had both the power and the responsibility to decide whether a successful patent owner needed injunctive relief and whether the imposition of that relief would unduly harm either the defendant or the public. The Court's application of the traditional four-factor equity test led, for the first time, to a significant number of cases in which courts found patent infringement but refused to enjoin continued infringement. That, in turn, has raised the question "what happens then?" As a matter of policy, the basic answer seems clear: …


Unconditional Acceptance: The Supreme Court Of Missouri's Interpretation Of Missouri Revised Statutes Section 167.131, Missy Mccoy Jun 2011

Unconditional Acceptance: The Supreme Court Of Missouri's Interpretation Of Missouri Revised Statutes Section 167.131, Missy Mccoy

Missouri Law Review

The unaccredited St. Louis Public School District had an average daily attendance of approximately 23,550 students in 2009, more than ten times the average attendance of the neighboring Clayton School District. In Turner v. School District of Clayton, the Supreme Court of Missouri faced the novel issue of interpreting Missouri Revised Statues section 167.131 as it related to children who resided in the currently unaccredited St. Louis Public School District but wished to attend schools in the accredited Clayton School District. After determining that the unaccredited district was responsible for the tuition of students who attended accredited schools, the majority …


On The Contemporary Meaning Of Korematsu: Liberty Lies In The Hearts Of Men And Women, David A. Harris Jan 2011

On The Contemporary Meaning Of Korematsu: Liberty Lies In The Hearts Of Men And Women, David A. Harris

Missouri Law Review

In just a few years, seven decades will have passed since the United States Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States, one of the most reviled of all of the Court's cases. However, similarities between the World War II era and our own have instigated a re-evaluation of Korematsu. When the Court decided Korenatsu in 1944, the United States was at war with the Japanese empire, which created considerable suspicion of anyone who shared the ethnicity of these foreign enemies. Since September 11, 2001, America has faced another external threat - from the al Qaeda terrorists - and there …