Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Labor and Employment Law (5)
- Torts (3)
- Transportation Law (3)
- Agency (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
-
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Taxation-State and Local (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Seamen, Railroad Employees, And Uber Drivers: Applying The Section 1 Exemption In The Federal Arbitration Ace To Rideshare Drivers, Conor Bradley
Seamen, Railroad Employees, And Uber Drivers: Applying The Section 1 Exemption In The Federal Arbitration Ace To Rideshare Drivers, Conor Bradley
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA or the Act) exempts “seamen, railroad employees, [and] any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” from arbitration. In 2019, the Supreme Court held in New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira that this provision exempted independent contractors as well as employees. This decision expanded the reach of the section 1 exemption and may affect the relationship between ridesharing companies, such as Uber, and their drivers. Previously, ridesharing companies argued that courts must enforce the arbitration clauses in their employment contracts because their workers were independent contractors and, therefore, section 1 …
A New Take On An Old Problem: Employee Misclassification In The Modern Gig-Economy, Jennifer Pinsof
A New Take On An Old Problem: Employee Misclassification In The Modern Gig-Economy, Jennifer Pinsof
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
For decades, U.S. labor and employment law has used a binary employment classification system, labeling workers as either employees or independent contractors. Employees are granted a variety of legal protections, while independent contractors are not. However, the explosion of the gig-economy—which connects consumers with underutilized resources—has produced a growing number of workers who do not seem to fit into either category. Though far from traditional employees, gig-workers bear little resemblance to independent contractors. Forced to choose, however, most gig-economy companies label their workers as independent contractors, depriving them of many basic worker-protections. Gig-workers have turned to the courts, hoping to …
Baring Inequality: Revisiting The Legalization Debate Through The Lens Of Strippers' Rights, Sheerine Alemzadeh
Baring Inequality: Revisiting The Legalization Debate Through The Lens Of Strippers' Rights, Sheerine Alemzadeh
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
The debate over legalization of prostitution has fractured the feminist legal community for over a quarter century. Pro-legalization advocates promote the benefits attending government regulation of prostitution, including the ability to better prosecute sex crimes, increase public health and educational resources for individuals in the commercial sex trade, and apply labor and safety regulations to the commercial sex industry in the same manner as they are applied to other businesses. Some anti-legalization advocates identify themselves as "new abolitionists," and argue that government recognition of prostitution reinforces gender inequality. Often, this debate is framed in the hypothetical: What would happen if …
Labor Law-Constitutional Law-Due Process Of Law-State Power To Enjoin Peaceful Picketing, L. B. Lea S.Ed.
Labor Law-Constitutional Law-Due Process Of Law-State Power To Enjoin Peaceful Picketing, L. B. Lea S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff was a wholesale ice distributor, selling ice to independent contractors. Defendants were members and officers of a union which represented many of the truck drivers employed by these peddlers. In carrying out a scheme to unionize all peddlers, defendants attempted to obtain plaintiff's agreement not to sell ice to non-union peddlers. Such an agreement would violate the state anti-trust law. On plaintiff's refusal, defendants peacefully picketed its plant. Plaintiff immediately suffered an 85% loss of business, and the state court granted it an injunction against the picketing. On appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, held, …
Constitutional Law - Constitutionality Of State Sales Tax On Defense Materials Purchased Under A Cost-Plus-A-Fixed-Fee Contract With The Federal Government, Lloyd M. Forster
Constitutional Law - Constitutionality Of State Sales Tax On Defense Materials Purchased Under A Cost-Plus-A-Fixed-Fee Contract With The Federal Government, Lloyd M. Forster
Michigan Law Review
X had a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract with the federal government, under which the government reserved the right to pay directly for purchases made by X pursuant to contract to give prior authorization for each purchase over $500, to inspect and acquire title to materials delivered under such contract, and to furnish materials itself. X ordered lumber from plaintiff, who contested the constitutionality of an Alabama sales tax levied on this sale, contending that the tax was levied on a transaction by which the United States secured goods for governmental purposes. Held, the tax should be sustained, since X, and …
Scope Of The Business: The Borrowed Servant Problem, Talbot Smith
Scope Of The Business: The Borrowed Servant Problem, Talbot Smith
Michigan Law Review
If your client wants to erect an office building he may be advised of the cost within narrow limits. The necessary expenditure will be X dollars plus Y lives or limbs. If his talents take the turn of bridge construction similar computations may be made. To carry forward to completion either of these projects he must use materials of various kinds, and he must use men. The expenditure of the human, animate, material is as inevitable as the expenditure of the inanimate. With increased care and skill the curve of expenditure of the human material will approach the asymptote of …
Torts - Principal And Agent - Liability For Negligent Driving
Torts - Principal And Agent - Liability For Negligent Driving
Michigan Law Review
Defendant company's salesman, driving his own car while selling defendant's washing-machines on a commission basis over a large territory, and with no regulation by the defendant except as to the terms of the contracts the salesman might make, negligently collided with plaintiff's car. Held, a salesman driving his own car, with no more supervision than existed here, is an independent contractor for whose negligence his employer is not liable. Stockwell v. Morris, (Wyo. 1933) 22 Pac. (2d) 189.
Master And Servant-Effect Of Servant's Ownership Of Instrumentality On Liability Of Master
Master And Servant-Effect Of Servant's Ownership Of Instrumentality On Liability Of Master
Michigan Law Review
Defendant contracted with miners to dig out clay at ton-rate, the miners to furnish their own equipment. They buried their powder to prevent theft; but some boys found it and were injured in its explosion. Held, the miners were independent contractors, but that, if they were employees, they did not act within the scope of their employment in burying their powder. General Refractories Co. v. Mozier (Ky. 1930) 30 S.W.(2d) 952.