Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

University of Michigan Law School

Michigan Law Review

Business Organizations Law

Dissolution

Articles 1 - 12 of 12

Full-Text Articles in Law

Corporate Life After Death: Cercla Preemption Of State Corporate Dissolution Law, Audrey J. Anderson Oct 1989

Corporate Life After Death: Cercla Preemption Of State Corporate Dissolution Law, Audrey J. Anderson

Michigan Law Review

This Note discusses CERCLA's preemption of state corporate dissolution law. Although CERCLA contains a preemption clause intended to specify CERCLA's relationship with other laws, this clause addresses only state laws that impose stricter standards than those contained in CERCLA, and does not address state laws that, like dissolution laws, remove liability from a party otherwise liable under CERCLA. Courts, therefore, have also looked to section 107 of CERCLA, which imposes liability against specified parties "[n]notwithstanding any other provision or rule of law," to determine CERCLA's general relationship with state law. Through such an analysis, courts have agreed that CERCLA does …


Right Of A Surviving Partner To Purchase A Deceased Partner's Interest Under The Uniform Partnership Act, Charles R. Frederickson Nov 1963

Right Of A Surviving Partner To Purchase A Deceased Partner's Interest Under The Uniform Partnership Act, Charles R. Frederickson

Michigan Law Review

This discussion is intended to demonstrate that, under the act, the likelihood of fraud should no longer be so controlling a factor as to require invariably a liquidation sale of partnership assets when a court of equity has within its supervisory powers the ability to protect fully all of the parties involved when a partnership is dissolved by death.


Corporations - Liquidation Upon Deadlock In Closely-Held Corporation - Interpretion Of Wisconsin Statute, Strong V. Fromm Laboratories,, Paul Komives May 1957

Corporations - Liquidation Upon Deadlock In Closely-Held Corporation - Interpretion Of Wisconsin Statute, Strong V. Fromm Laboratories,, Paul Komives

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, as trustee of an estate, held fifty percent of the shares of a going corporation. An election to fill all four positions on the corporation's board of directors was held. Since a by-law required that directors be shareholders, plaintiff was the only member of his own faction for whom he could vote. The opposing faction, holding the remaining fifty percent of the shares, had four eligible candidates. Votes for each of the four were cast, with one receiving one vote less than the other three. Plaintiff voted all of his shares for himself and also cast a vote of …


Corporations - Preference Rights On Dissolution, Robert B. Fiske, Jr. S.Ed. Apr 1955

Corporations - Preference Rights On Dissolution, Robert B. Fiske, Jr. S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The capital structure of the defendant corporation consisted of class A, class B, and preferred stock. According to the articles of association, the class A stock was entitled to a ten percent dividend before any dividend was paid on the class B. After the class B stock had also received a ten percent dividend, the two classes were to share equally in any further dividends. The charter further provided that on dissolution the holders of the class A stock were entitled to cash to the amount of the par value of their stock before any payment in …


Partnership - Dissolution On Death - Right Of Representatives Of The Deceased Partner To Share In Good Will, Richard M. Adams Dec 1954

Partnership - Dissolution On Death - Right Of Representatives Of The Deceased Partner To Share In Good Will, Richard M. Adams

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff sought a judgment against the administrator of his deceased partner to compel the conveyance of the deceased's one-half interest in the partnership assets. Under the terms of the partnership agreement the surviving partner had the right to buy out the interest of the deceased partner at its "then book value." The administrator contended that good will was a valuable partnership asset, even though not carried on the books, and should be taken into account in determining the price of the deceased's interest. On appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, held, affirmed. By setting the price of the deceased's …


Corporations-Applicability Of General Corporate Dissolution Procedure To Associations Organized Under Building And Loan Act, Howard W. Haftel S.Ed. Dec 1949

Corporations-Applicability Of General Corporate Dissolution Procedure To Associations Organized Under Building And Loan Act, Howard W. Haftel S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Building and loan associations are organizations designed for the general purpose of accumulating by gradual payments of their members a fund to be invested primarily in loans on real estate. At present these organizations almost invariably are corporations for profit. Because of their economic importance these associations have long been regarded as affected with a public interest and therefore subject to a higher degree of regulation than would be sustained in the case of ordinary profit-making corporations. Special legislation is necessary because building and loan associations differ widely from other corporations in financial structure and operation.


Partnership-Effect Of Provision That Executor Of Deceased Partner Shall Continue Partnership As Partner, Irving Slifkin S.Ed. May 1948

Partnership-Effect Of Provision That Executor Of Deceased Partner Shall Continue Partnership As Partner, Irving Slifkin S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

In a recent decision the Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld the validity of a provision in a partnership agreement to the effect that the personal representative of the deceased partner should continue the business as a partner, and also stated: "There is no doubt that a partner may provide by his will that the partnership shall continue notwithstanding his death." The deceased partner by his will gave to his executor broad discretionary powers of sale over all of his property. To his widow the deceased partner bequeathed a share of his interest in the partnership business. The executor of the deceased …


Joint Adventure--Right Of Co-Adventurers To Sue Each Other At Law, Ralph J. Isackson Apr 1948

Joint Adventure--Right Of Co-Adventurers To Sue Each Other At Law, Ralph J. Isackson

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff and defendants, joint adventurers, entered into an agreement whereby plaintiff was allegedly entitled to a cash payment from the funds of the joint undertaking. Plaintiff brought an action against defendants to recover the amount claimed. Neither party requested termination of the business. The trial court ordered a reference for accounting and then, without terminating the joint adventure, found that plaintiff was entitled to be paid out of the assets of the joint adventure as agreed. On appeal, held, reversed. As plaintiff and defendants were joint venturers it was necessary to have a termination of the joint adventure and …


Corporations-Extent Of Powers To Dispose Of Property In Winding Up Its Affairs Under Statutes Extending Corporate Existence, Joseph R. Brookshire S.Ed. Apr 1946

Corporations-Extent Of Powers To Dispose Of Property In Winding Up Its Affairs Under Statutes Extending Corporate Existence, Joseph R. Brookshire S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

According to the common law a dissolved corporation ceased to exist for all purposes. Whether the dissolution was voluntary or involuntary, the effect of the dissolution was to deprive the corporation of all powers either de jure or de facto. It was necessary, therefore, that corporations facing dissolution proceed without delay toward a final liquidation and distribution of assets. Disregarding the old theory that personal property of dissolved corporations escheated to the state, and that its real estate reverted to the original granter or his heirs, and that debts due the corporation were extinguished, it is still apparent that hurried …


Corporations - Right Of Preferred Stockholders To Participate In Dividends Beyond Specified Amount Apr 1935

Corporations - Right Of Preferred Stockholders To Participate In Dividends Beyond Specified Amount

Michigan Law Review

The holders of a minority of the preferred stock of a foundry company petitioned for receivership and repayment of part of the dividends which had been paid to common stockholders, contending that after payment of the stipulated 6 per cent dividend on the preferred stock and a like percentage on the common stock, preferred and common stockholders should participate alike in all further dividends declared. There was no provision in the articles or by-laws of the corporation concerning such participation in dividends. Held, that in the absence of express provision, preferred stockholders are entitled to receive only their guaranteed …


Receivers -Liability For Corporate Franchise Taxes Accruing After Appointment May 1932

Receivers -Liability For Corporate Franchise Taxes Accruing After Appointment

Michigan Law Review

General business conditions of the last three years have made the field of receivership law an extremely interesting and important one to that portion of the bar which has been picking up the pieces left by the debacle of 1929. The widespread liquidation and dissolution of great business organizations has been effected in large part through the medium of the receivership. One of the more difficult problems arising in connection with such receiverships has been the liability of the receiver for franchise taxes. Such taxes have been held to be not property levies but excises on the privilege to carry …


Corporations - Rights And Remedies Of Dissenting Stockholders Upon Consolidation And Merger May 1932

Corporations - Rights And Remedies Of Dissenting Stockholders Upon Consolidation And Merger

Michigan Law Review

Consolidation or merger of private corporations in recent years has been more and more frequent. One of the most engrossing problems when such unions take place is that of the rights and remedies of dissenting shareholders. The question which arises most frequently in cases of consolidation or merger, and that in the solution of which, paradoxicaIIy, our courts tend to expend the least amount of legal acumen, is whether the consolidation or merger of corporations operates to dissolve the constituent corporations in such a manner as materially to affect the rights of the shareholders in those corporations.