Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative costs (1)
- Akamai Technologies Inc. v. Limelight Networks Inc. (1)
- Claims (1)
- Congress (1)
- Damages (1)
-
- Deterrence (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Evictions (1)
- Forcible detainer (1)
- Forcible entry action (1)
- Homeowners (1)
- Homes (1)
- Infringement (1)
- Intentional torts (1)
- Judicial foreclosures (1)
- Liability (1)
- Limited liability companies (1)
- Limited liability partnerships (1)
- Mathias v. Accor Economy Lodging (1)
- Mens rea (1)
- Nonjudicial forecolosures (1)
- Noteholders (1)
- Partnership formation (1)
- Partnerships (1)
- Patent Act of 1952 (1)
- Patents (1)
- Punitive damages (1)
- Reasonableness (1)
- Respondeat superior (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Resolving The Divided Patent Infringement Dilemma, Nathanial Grow
Resolving The Divided Patent Infringement Dilemma, Nathanial Grow
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article considers cases of divided patent infringement: those in which two or more parties collectively perform all the steps of a patented claim, but where no single party acting alone has completed the entire patented invention. Despite the increasing frequency with which such cases appear to be arising, courts have struggled to equitably resolve these lawsuits under the constraints of the existing statutory framework because of the competing policy concerns they present. On the one hand, any standard that holds two or more parties strictly liable whenever their combined actions infringe a patent risks imposing liability on countless seemingly …
It Is Time For Washington State To Take A Stand Against Holmes's Bad Man: The Value Of Punitive Damages In Deterring Big Business And International Tortfeasors, Jackson Pahlke
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In Washington State, tortfeasors get a break when they commit intentional torts. Instead of receiving more punishment for their planned bad act, intentional tortfeasors are punished as if they committed a mere accident. The trend does not stop in Washington State—nationwide, punitive damage legislation inadequately deters intentional wrongdoers through caps and outright bans on punitive damages. Despite Washington State’s one hundred and twenty-five year ban on punitive damages, it is in a unique and powerful position to change the way courts across the country deal with intentional tortfeasors. Since Washington has never had a comprehensive punitive damages framework, and has …
Where Kafka Reigns: A Call For Metamorphosis In Unlawful Detainer Law, John Campbell
Where Kafka Reigns: A Call For Metamorphosis In Unlawful Detainer Law, John Campbell
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This story reflects a new reality in which nonjudicial foreclosure, combined with draconian unlawful detainer laws, concretizes the injuries associated with wrongful foreclosure, degrades the perceived legitimacy of the courts, and suppresses valid claims of wrongful foreclosure. Indeed, this very scenario happens regularly in a variety of states. This story is a very real tale of how homeowners are harmed by a foreclosure process that has largely escaped scholarly review. Rooted in the belief that sunshine is a powerful disinfectant, this Article aims to shed light on states that hogtie homeowners and makes a normative argument that such a process …
Three Problems (And Two Solutions) In The Law Of Partnership Formation, Shawn Bayern
Three Problems (And Two Solutions) In The Law Of Partnership Formation, Shawn Bayern
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article considers several foundational questions concerning the formation of general partnerships, a topic that has received little modern attention and that is governed largely by classical axioms rather than adaptive modern considerations. Its three main topics concern (1) the timing of partnership formation, (2) the aggregation of multiple distinct questions under the single heading of “partnership formation,” and (3) the rarely challenged proposition that general partners ought to be liable for partnership obligations, a doctrine that is surprisingly at odds with the rest of modern business-entity law.