Law Commons^™

Reconstructing Klein, Helen Hershkoff, Fred Smith, Jr.

University of Chicago Law Review

This Article interrogates the conventional understanding of United States v. Klein, a Reconstruction Era decision that concerned Congress’s effort to remove appellate jurisdiction from the Supreme Court in a lawsuit seeking compensation for abandoned property confiscated by the United States during the Civil War. Scholars often celebrate the decision for protecting judicial independence; so, too, they applaud the decision for shielding property rights against arbitrary legislative action and for preserving executive clemency from legislative encroachment. Absent from all contemporary accounts of Klein is its racialized context: The decision allowed an unelected judiciary to disable Congress from blocking the president’s promiscuous …

Searching For Standing: Are Improper Acquisition Or Threatened Misappropriation Of Trade Secrets Cognizable Injuries Sufficient For Article Iii Standing?, Josh J. Leopold

University of Chicago Law Review

Trade secret litigation is on the rise. Meanwhile, modern standing cases have forced courts and commentators to reevaluate what sorts of legal injuries bring factual injuries with them, such that federal courts can adjudicate them as a “case” or “controversy” under Article III of the Constitution.

his Comment studies the intersection of Article III standing and federal trade secret law. It is the first piece to provide a taxonomy of trade secret violations and factual injuries in the shadow of standing doctrine’s demand for an injury-in-fact. This Comment submits a bold yet plausible claim: Article III standing should be in …

Seizure Or Due Process? Section 1983 Enforcement Against Pretrial Detention Caused By Fabricated Evidence, Jorge Pereira

University of Chicago Law Review

Can an individual who was held in pretrial detention but not criminally convicted as a result of fabricated evidence raise a due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983? The answer is unclear. In 2017, the Supreme Court in Manuel v. City of Joliet held that claims for unlawful pretrial detention are governed by the Fourth Amendment. Since then, the Seventh Circuit has asserted that the Fourth Amendment is the only source of redress under § 1983 for wrongful pretrial detention caused by fabricated evidence. By contrast, several circuits have opined that Manuel does not foreclose the possibility that individuals …

Undefined “Ground”: Form Or Substance In Pto Estoppel, Tanvi Antoo

University of Chicago Law Review

This Comment seeks to resolve a dispute among district courts on how to interpret the term “ground” in 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2), the America Invents Act’s (AIA) estoppel provision. The question of whether a party that asserts a printed publication or patent in an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding is estopped from asserting real- world prior art, such as a device, in a later civil action under § 315(e)(2) has resulted in a district court split. Some courts have construed the estoppel provision narrowly, reasoning that because a physical object like a device is not something that could have been …

Decarcerating Immigrant Detainee Medical Care: A Path To Doctrinal Redemption, Kieran Dosanjh

University of Chicago Law Review

Government detention is a quid pro quo: the government may deprive persons of their physical liberty, but in exchange, it owes them a level of care. The critical question is, how much care does the Constitution require the government to provide? In a series of federal judicial decisions (collectively, the detainee medical care doctrine), courts have found that the Constitution requires different standards of care for different classes of government detainees. These courts’ standard of care for immigrant detainees is erroneous. Modern U.S. immigration detention’s descriptive resemblance to criminal confinement has prompted courts to (wrongly) find that immigrant detainees are …

Closing A Loophole In Exchange Act Enforcement: A Framework For Assessing The Enforceability Of Delaware Forum Selection Bylaws In The Context Of Derivative § 14(A) Claims, Amanda K. Williams

University of Chicago Law Review

Over the past decade, a growing number of Delaware corporations have adopted forum selection bylaws. These bylaws often require that all derivative claims against a company’s officers or directors be resolved in Delaware state courts. But what happens when a shareholder brings a derivative claim that Delaware courts do not have jurisdiction to adjudicate?

This issue arises when Delaware forum selection bylaws are applied to derivative claims arising under § 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, because the Exchange Act instructs that only federal courts may resolve such claims. In this context, Delaware corporations may seek to …

It’S Raining Rockets: Heightening State Liability For Space Pollution, Sraavya Poonuganti

Chicago Journal of International Law

The uptick in outer space exploration activity by spacefaring nations has resulted in the increased proliferation of space debris orbiting Earth and reentering its atmosphere. The current liability regime, which was enacted as a result of the U.S.–Soviet Union space race in the 1960s and ’70s, is ill-equipped to mitigate and deter such proliferation. Without proactive measures, the space debris buildup could escalate into the Kessler Syndrome, a proposed scenario in which space exploration, and its corresponding benefits, may be rendered infeasible due to the extreme risk of high-impact space object collisions. This Comment first analyzes existing proposals for amending …

Applying Derivative United Nations Immunity To Humanitarian Ngos, Tori Keller

Chicago Journal of International Law

United Nations (U.N.) privileges and immunities, enshrined in the Convention on Privileges and Immunities, protect U.N. personnel from legal proceedings and facilitate U.N. missions in volatile contexts. Today, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are essential providers of emergency humanitarian assistance in some of the most dangerous states. Even though some NGOs work under U.N. funding agreements, they lack the protective immunities of the U.N. This Comment assesses the bases for U.N. immunity and the similar concept of derivative sovereign immunity, whereby sovereign governments extend their immunity to quasigovernment entities and private contractors. It argues that derivative immunity from states is based on …

Accounting For The Selfish State: Human Rights, Reproductive Equality, And Global Regulation Of Gestational Surrogacy, Claudia Flores

Chicago Journal of International Law

Gestational surrogacy is a relatively new method of procreation made possible by advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART). In gestational surrogacy, a woman (gestational carrier) gestates a fetus that is often biologically unrelated to her on behalf of a third party. While this form of procreation has often been celebrated for allowing infertile and fertility-challenged persons to parent biological offspring, it has also prompted a series of complex human rights-related debates. Inconsistent and extreme state responses to gestational surrogacy have led to myriad tragedies: states have arrested gestational carriers, forced carriers to raise children born through the process, denied individuals …

Hiding In Plain Sight: An Ilo Convention On Labor Standards In Global Supply Chains, James J. Brudney

Chicago Journal of International Law

This Article proposes a solution to the primary challenge currently confronting governments, employers, and workers under international labor law: how to promote and protect decent labor conditions in global supply chains (GSCs).

The Article begins by summarizing why existing public law and private law approaches have failed to meet this challenge over several decades. It describes the shortcomings of law and practice in developing countries as well as the weakness of corporate social responsibility (CSR), including the most ambitious version of CSR, the U.N. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. It then analyzes the problems with recent national laws …

Discursive Constitutionalism, Ngoc Son Bui

Chicago Journal of International Law

“Constitutionalism” has been contentiously debated at national and international levels. This Article develops the concept of discursive constitutionalism, defined as the construction of constitutionalism through public discourse. It theorizes about four elements (ideas, actors, actions, and spaces) and the constructive logic of discursive constitutionalism. Public constitutionalist discourse can be shaped by the existing relations of political power. At the same time, it can constrain the political monopoly of constitutional thinking, shape the design of institutions to limit political power, and prevent the arbitrary use of political power in practice. This study provides an explanatory account of three models of discursive …

When Bill Rolls Off: Continuity And Change On Corporate Boards, Adriana Z. Robertson, Peter Cziraki

Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics

The number of women on public company boards has increased dramatically in recent years. We study where these women directors came from and how they were absorbed. In the past five years, women with board experience obtain significantly more board seats than their male colleagues. Women directors are also more likely to have no previous board experience than men, indicating movement on both the intensive and extensive margin. Adding a woman director is associated with a transitory increase in board size about a third of the time. This increase reverts the following year when an existing director rolls off.

When Federal Courts Remediate Intrastate Redistricting Stalemates: Parsing What Is Owed Deference When State Policies Conflict, Erin Yonchak

University of Chicago Law Review

When partisan politics completely frustrate the efforts of a state to redistrict after a census, federal district courts are tasked with the “unwelcome obligation” of imposing court-ordered electoral maps that meet the federal constitutional one-per- son, one-vote requirement. This Comment terms these cases “intrastate redistricting stalemates,” novelly distinguishing them from other Equal Protection one-person, one-vote cases. In the wake of Moore v. Harper, federal courts may be remediating more intrastate redistricting stalemates than ever if state courts are stripped of their power to impose remedial congressional maps as outside the scope of “ordinary judicial review” permitted under the Elections Clause. …

Achieving Appropriate Relief For Religious Freedom Violations In Prisons After Tanzin, Bethany Ao

University of Chicago Law Review

In the 1990s, Congress passed the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) to decrease frivolous prisoner litigation. One PLRA provision that was aimed at accomplishing that goal is § 1997e(e), which states that no prisoner can bring a federal civil action for mental or emotional injury without a showing of an accompanying physical injury. This provision has created a circuit split over whether prisoners who suffer a violation of their Free Exercise rights under the First Amendment can re- cover compensatory damages. If the split is left unresolved, it will lead to a troubling lack of uniformity in the law for …

Gender And The Social Structure Of Exclusion In U.S. Corporate Law, Afra Afsharipour, Matthew Jennejohn

University of Chicago Law Review

Law develops through collective effort. A single judge may write a judicial opinion, but only after an (often large) group of lawyers chooses litigation strategies, crafts arguments, and presents their positions. Despite their important role in the legal process, these networks of lawyers are almost uniformly overlooked in legal scholarship—a black box in a discipline otherwise obsessed with institutional detail.

This Article focuses on a particularly crucial way that the structure of professional networks may shape the path of the law. Prior qualitative research suggests that networks are an important source of information, mentoring, and opportunity, and that those social …

New Life For The Unlawful Inclosures Act: Immunizing Corner-Crossers From State Trespass Actionew Life For The Unlawful Inclosures Act: Immunizing Corner-Crossers From State Trespass Actions, Burke Snowden

University of Chicago Law Review

In many parts of the rural western United States, the land is divided into rectangular parcels that alternate between private and public ownership, so as to resemble a checkerboard. Some of those public parcels are “corner-locked,” meaning that they meet other public parcels only at a corner. It is technically not possible to access corner-locked parcels without at least briefly hovering over a private parcel, which constitutes trespass on the private parcel under the ad coelum doctrine.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic has increased demand for outdoor tourism, more people have been endeavoring to reach the public parcels by “corner-crossing” from …

Prosecutors, Race, And The Criminal Pipeline, Hannah Shaffer

University of Chicago Law Review

This Article presents evidence that some state prosecutors use their discretion to reduce racial disparities in criminal sentences. This finding challenges the prevailing view that prosecutors compound disparities. Given prosecutors’ positions as mediators in a sequential system, this Article analyzes how prosecutors respond to disparities they inherit from the past—and interprets their impacts in light of the accumulated disparities that already exist when they first open their case files. Specifically, I estimate how the sentencing penalty for prior convictions differs by defendant race using North Carolina state court records from 2010 to 2019. I find that the increase in the …

Law School Announcements 2023-2024, Law School Announcements Editors

Announcements

• Officers and Faculty
• The Law School - History
• Programs of Instruction
• Curriculum
• Student Activities and Organizations
• Funds and Endowments

Racial Time, Yuvraj Joshi

University of Chicago Law Review

Racial time describes how inequality shapes people’s experiences and perceptions of time. This Article reviews the multidisciplinary literature on racial time and then demonstrates how Black activists have made claims about time that challenge prevailing norms. While white majorities often view racial justice measures as both too late and too soon, too fast and too long-lasting, Black activists remind us that justice measures are never “well timed” within hegemonic understandings of time. This Article ultimately argues that U.S. law embodies dominant interests in time. By inscribing dominant experiences and expectations of time into law, the Supreme Court enforces unrealistic timelines …

Politics By Other Means: The Jurisprudence Of “Common Good Constitutionalism”, Brian Leiter

University of Chicago Law Review

Professor Adrian Vermeule proposes an alternative to what he sees as the two dominant schools of constitutional interpretation in the United States: originalism and what he usually calls “progressivism”¹ (by which he means what others call “living constitutionalism”² ). Against these approaches, he advocates for what Freudians might call a “return of the repressed”³: a recognition of the extent to which the “classical” natural law tradition’s concern with the “common good” has continued to animate our public law—explicitly for much of our history, he says, and implicitly more recently.

On Vermeule’s proposed alternative, courts (and other …

Vagueness And Federal-State Relations, Joel S. Johnson

University of Chicago Law Review

This Article aims to clarify the content of the void-for-vagueness doctrine and defend its historical pedigree by drawing attention to a fundamental aspect of the Supreme Court’s vagueness decisions—that vagueness analysis significantly depends on whether the law at issue is a federal or state law. That simple distinction has considerable explanatory power. It reveals that the doctrine emerged in the late nineteenth century in response to two simultaneous changes in the legal landscape— first, the availability of Supreme Court due process review of state penal statutes under the Fourteenth Amendment, and second, a significant shift in how state courts construed …

Droughts Of Compassion: The Enduring Problem With Compassionate Release And How The Sentencing Commission Can Address It, Nathaniel Berry

University of Chicago Law Review

Compassionate release, guided by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), allows a district court to reduce a previously imposed criminal sentence if “extraordinary and compelling reasons” warrant a reduction. Congress delegated the task of describing what constitutes an extraordinary and compelling reason to the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Following the passage of the First Step Act of 2018, most circuit courts held the Commission’s policy statement describing extraordinary and compelling reasons inapplicable, and that until the Commission updated its policy statement, courts enjoyed the discretion to determine what circumstances justify compassionate release.

e. Many have celebrated this newfound discretion and its potential to …

Clean Up Your Act: The U.S. Government’S Cercla Liability For Uranium Mines On The Navajo Nation, Michelle David

University of Chicago Law Review

This Comment delves into the Cold War legacy of uranium mining on the Navajo Nation. Today, unremediated hazardous waste from more than five hundred deserted mines has continued to poison the health and lands of the Navajo. This Comment argues that the federal government is ultimately liable for the remediation of these mines under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Specifically, because the federal government held legal title to the mining lands and tightly managed the mining operations, the federal government satisfies CERCLA’s liability regime for “owners” and “operators.” The U.S. government’s liability under CERCLA warrants fuller …

Law School Record, Vol. 70, No. 1 (Fall 2023), Law School Record Editors

Law School Record

• Message from the Dean
• Law School Faculty Shaping the Law with Their Ideas
• Lies and the Law
• With Two Generous Gifts, Pavel Malyi, LLM ’95, Promotes the Rule of Law Internationally
• Three Alumni to Clerk on US Supreme Court in 2023–2024 Term
• Art and the Law
• The Producers
• Law School Clinic Secures US Supreme Court Win in ICWA Case
• Student Q&A
• Law School Student and Alumna Win Coveted New Venture Awards
• Graduation 2023
• Chicago Unbound
• Scenes From Orientation
• Development News
• In Memoriam
• Meet the Class of 2026

The Rise Of Nonbinding International Agreements: An Empirical, Comparative, And Normative Analysis, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith, Oona A. Hathaway

University of Chicago Law Review

The treaty process specified in Article II of the Constitution has been dying a slow death for decades, replaced by various forms of “executive agreements.” What is only beginning to be appreciated is the extent to which both treaties and executive agreements are increasingly being overshadowed by another form of international cooperation: nonbinding international agreements. Not only have nonbinding agreements become more prevalent, but many of the most consequential (and often controversial) U.S. international agreements in recent years have been concluded in whole or in significant part as nonbinding agreements. Despite their prevalence and importance, nonbinding agreements have not traditionally …

Stating The Obvious: Departmental Policies As Clearly Established Law, Eliana Fleischer

University of Chicago Law Review

Qualified immunity is a judge-made doctrine originally created to shield officers from liability only when they could not have been on notice that their actions were wrongful. In the four decades since the Supreme Court first articulated this justification for qualified immunity, the doctrine has become unmoored from its roots and has expanded to protect officers even in the face of clear evidence that the officers should have known better.

The test for qualified immunity states that officers are immune from liability in the absence of clearly established law that previously condemned their conduct, but the Supreme Court has not …

Insurance Coverage And Induced Infringement: A Threat To Hatch-Waxman’S Skinny Labeling Pathway?, Maya Lorey

University of Chicago Law Review

In the fall of 2020, Amarin Corporation—a brand-name drug company— brought an unprecedented claim in federal court. Instead of just suing a generic manufacturer for inducing infringement of its method patent, as is typical in litigation over skinny label generic drugs, Amarin also added a health insurance company as a defendant. In its complaint, Amarin alleged that Health Net induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) of the Patent Act by charging a lower co-pay for the generic, skinny label version of its brand-name drug. Industry commentators agreed that a finding of liability for Health Net would be a blow …

The Fair Housing Act After Inclusive Communities: Why One-Time Land-Use Decisions Can Still Establish A Disparate Impact, Kate Gehling

University of Chicago Law Review

The Fair Housing Act (FHA) is a civil rights statute that prohibits housing discrimination against several protected classes. One theory of liability under the FHA is disparate impact, in which a plaintiff alleges that the defendant’s policy or practice, although facially neutral, nevertheless has discriminatory effects because it disproportionately negatively affects a protected class. In its 2015 opinion, Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., the Supreme Court affirmed that the FHA includes disparate impact liability but also potentially limited its applicability—the Court distinguished between a defendant’s policy and a one-time decision by a defendant, …

Unshackling Cities, Felipe Ford Cole

University of Chicago Law Review

Scholars have long demonstrated that cities are constrained by states and the federal government in the exercise of their power. While important, the emphasis on these “vertical” constraints on cities does not account for the “horizontal” constraints on city power from private actors. This Article suggests that the emphasis on vertical constraints on city power is due to a misunderstanding of the history of local government law that describes its sole function as the vertical distribution of power between cities and different levels of government. I revise the history of Dillon’s Rule, the doctrinal cornerstone of local government law’s vertical …

The Fourth Amendment Without Police, Shawn E. Fields

University of Chicago Law Review

What role will the Fourth Amendment play in a world without police? As academics, activists, and lawmakers explore alternatives to traditional law enforcement, it bears asking whether the amendment primarily tasked with regulating police investigations would also regulate postpolice public safety agencies. Surprisingly, the answer is often no. Courts are reluctant to recognize protections from government searches or seizures outside criminal investigations, and they are even more reluctant to require probable cause or a warrant for such conduct. Thus, by removing most public safety functions outside the criminal sphere, abolitionists also move intrusive government conduct outside these traditional strictures and …