Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 23 of 23
Full-Text Articles in Law
Comments: Limiting Local Zoning Regulation Of Electric Utilities: A Balanced Approach In The Public Interest, Sager A. Williams Jr.
Comments: Limiting Local Zoning Regulation Of Electric Utilities: A Balanced Approach In The Public Interest, Sager A. Williams Jr.
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes: Right To Die — Court Requires Clear And Convincing Evidence Of Persistent Vegetative Patient's Intent To Terminate Life-Sustaining Procedures; Health Care Decisions Act Of 1993 Casts New Light On Outcome. Mack V. Mack, 329 Md. 188, 618 A.2d 744 (1993), Thomas J. Brindisi
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments: The Dual Sovereignty Exception To Double Jeopardy: An Unnecessary Loophole, Christina Galye Woods
Comments: The Dual Sovereignty Exception To Double Jeopardy: An Unnecessary Loophole, Christina Galye Woods
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Impeachment And Rehabilitation Under The Maryland Rules Of Evidence: An Attorney's Guide, Paul W. Grimm
Impeachment And Rehabilitation Under The Maryland Rules Of Evidence: An Attorney's Guide, Paul W. Grimm
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Doing Right By Our Kids: A Case Study In The Perils Of Making Policy On Television Violence, Patricia M. Wald
Doing Right By Our Kids: A Case Study In The Perils Of Making Policy On Television Violence, Patricia M. Wald
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Suits Against State Officials For Damages For Violations Of Constitutional Rights: Comparing Maryland And Federal Law, Stephen J. Shapiro
Suits Against State Officials For Damages For Violations Of Constitutional Rights: Comparing Maryland And Federal Law, Stephen J. Shapiro
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bold Promises But Baby Steps: Maryland's Growth Policy To The Year 2020, Philip J. Tierney
Bold Promises But Baby Steps: Maryland's Growth Policy To The Year 2020, Philip J. Tierney
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes: The Best Interests Of The Child Must Be Considered Before Rebutting The Presumption Of Legitimacy. Turner V. Whisted, 327 Md. 106, 607 A.2d 935 (1992), David J. Shuster
Notes: The Best Interests Of The Child Must Be Considered Before Rebutting The Presumption Of Legitimacy. Turner V. Whisted, 327 Md. 106, 607 A.2d 935 (1992), David J. Shuster
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comment: Grossly Excessive Attorney's Fee Requests Under The Civil Rights Attorney's Fee Awards Act: Should The Entire Fee Request Be Denied?, Bernard P. Codd
Comment: Grossly Excessive Attorney's Fee Requests Under The Civil Rights Attorney's Fee Awards Act: Should The Entire Fee Request Be Denied?, Bernard P. Codd
University of Baltimore Law Review
The importance of civil rights in our society is underscored by the availability of legal redress to individuals who have suffered a deprivation of those rights. The vindication of civil rights, however, often depends upon the people least able to afford the legal fees involved in commencing a civil rights action. While contingent fee arrangements! may provide personal injury plaintiffs who cannot afford counsel the opportunity to have their day in court, such arrangements generally do not entice lawyers to accept civil rights cases that "frequently involve substantial expenditures of time and effort but produce only small monetary recoveries." ' …
Notes: Grandparent Visitation — The One And Only Standard — Best Interests Of The Child. Fairbanks V. Mccarter, 330 Md. 39, 622 A.2d 121 (1993), Jacquelyn E. Avin
Notes: Grandparent Visitation — The One And Only Standard — Best Interests Of The Child. Fairbanks V. Mccarter, 330 Md. 39, 622 A.2d 121 (1993), Jacquelyn E. Avin
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments: Professional Responsibility — Attorney — Client Privilege: Are Expectations Of Privacy Reasonable For Communications Broadcast Via Cordless Or Cellular Telephones?, Anthony S. Higgins
Comments: Professional Responsibility — Attorney — Client Privilege: Are Expectations Of Privacy Reasonable For Communications Broadcast Via Cordless Or Cellular Telephones?, Anthony S. Higgins
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Baltimore Law Review Volume 23 Number 2 (Spring 1994) Front Matter
University Of Baltimore Law Review Volume 23 Number 2 (Spring 1994) Front Matter
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes: Constitutional Law — Maryland's Drug — Free School Zone Statute, Which Increases Penalties For Distribution Of Controlled Dangerous Substances Within 1000 Feet Of School Property, Satisfies Due Process Requirements. Dawson V. State, 329 Md. 275, 619 A.2d 111 (1993), Shara Beth Mervis
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes: The Eighth Amendment Proportionality Requirement: Maryland's Judicial Legislature "Repeals" An Open — Ended Common — Law Sentence. Thomas V. State, 333 Md. 84, 634 A.2d 1 (1993), Gina Subilia Lindekugel
Notes: The Eighth Amendment Proportionality Requirement: Maryland's Judicial Legislature "Repeals" An Open — Ended Common — Law Sentence. Thomas V. State, 333 Md. 84, 634 A.2d 1 (1993), Gina Subilia Lindekugel
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments: "Secondary Effects" Analysis: A Balanced Approach To The Problem Of Prohibitions On Aggressive Panhandling, William L. Mitchell Ii
Comments: "Secondary Effects" Analysis: A Balanced Approach To The Problem Of Prohibitions On Aggressive Panhandling, William L. Mitchell Ii
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes: Torts — Punitive Damages Are Not Recoverable In A Negligence Action Against An Intoxicated Driver Absent A Showing Of Actual Malice. Komornik V. Sparks, 331 Md. 720, 629 A.2d 721 (1993), Jill D. Loper
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments: Atlantis Revisited: Recovery Under Maryland Law For Purely Economic Loss Against Negligent Builders And Manufacturers, Michael R. Mccann
Comments: Atlantis Revisited: Recovery Under Maryland Law For Purely Economic Loss Against Negligent Builders And Manufacturers, Michael R. Mccann
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Baltimore Law Review Volume 24 Number 1 (Fall 1994) Front Matter
University Of Baltimore Law Review Volume 24 Number 1 (Fall 1994) Front Matter
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes: Crimes And Punishments — Child Selling — Maryland's Statute Prohibiting The Sale, Barter, Or Trade Of A Child Is Not Limited To Proscribing For-Profit Adoptions, But Also Covers The Transfer Of The Custody Of A Child In Exchange For Money. State V. Runkles, 326 Md. 384, 605 A.2d 111 (1992), Randi Alyce Klein
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Authentication Of Certified Copies Of Business Records, Lynn Mclain
Self-Authentication Of Certified Copies Of Business Records, Lynn Mclain
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Residual Hearsay Exceptions: Maryland's Lukewarm Welcome, Howard S. Chasanow, José F. Anderson
The Residual Hearsay Exceptions: Maryland's Lukewarm Welcome, Howard S. Chasanow, José F. Anderson
University of Baltimore Law Review
On July 1, 1994 Maryland codified its rules of evidence, bringing them into accord with the substance of the Federal Rules of Evidence. In doing so, Maryland followed the trend set by thirty-seven other states. The codified evidence rules, known collectively as Title 5 of the Maryland Rules, were made applicable to "all actions and proceedings in the courts of this State," with some exceptions.
Notes: Torts — Negligence — The Fireman's Rule — Public Policy Or Premises Liability? The Proper Basis For The Fire Fighter's Rule In Maryland. Southland Corp. V. Griffith, 332 Md. 704, 633 A.2d 84 (1993), Ami C. Dwyer
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes: The Uncertain Status Of The Required Evidence Test In Resolving Multiple Punishment Questions In Maryland. Eldridge V. State, 329 Md. 307, 619 A.2d 531 (1993), Robert A. Scott
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.