Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- ADR (1)
- Accommodation party (1)
- Alternative dispute resolution (1)
- Appeal (1)
- Appellate Caseload (1)
-
- Arbitration (1)
- Arkansas (1)
- Arkansas law (1)
- Article 3 (1)
- Calendar (1)
- Caseload (1)
- Child abuse (1)
- Conflict (1)
- Conversion (1)
- Discharge (1)
- Employment law (1)
- Fair dealings (1)
- Forgery (1)
- Judicial Efficiency (1)
- Judicial and adminstrative systems (1)
- Liability (1)
- Material modification (1)
- Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (1)
- Release (1)
- Reservation of rights (1)
- Rose v. Spear (1)
- Satisfaction and accord (1)
- Scheduling (1)
- Seperation of Powers (1)
- State law (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy: Broadening The Scope Of Child Abuse, Michael T. Flannery
Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy: Broadening The Scope Of Child Abuse, Michael T. Flannery
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
From Star To Supernova To Dark, Cold Neutron Star: The Early Life, The Explosion And The Collapse Of Arbitration, Michael Hunter Schwartz
From Star To Supernova To Dark, Cold Neutron Star: The Early Life, The Explosion And The Collapse Of Arbitration, Michael Hunter Schwartz
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Arkansas's Revised Article 3: User Caution Advised!!, Sarah Howard Jenkins
Arkansas's Revised Article 3: User Caution Advised!!, Sarah Howard Jenkins
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Separation Of Powers Conflicts In The "Reform" Of Arkansas Workers' Compensation Law, J. Thomas Sullivan
Separation Of Powers Conflicts In The "Reform" Of Arkansas Workers' Compensation Law, J. Thomas Sullivan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
New Mexico's Summary Calendar For Disposition Of Crimnal Appeals: An Invitation To Inefficiency, Ineffectiveness And Injustice, J. Thomas Sullivan
New Mexico's Summary Calendar For Disposition Of Crimnal Appeals: An Invitation To Inefficiency, Ineffectiveness And Injustice, J. Thomas Sullivan
Faculty Scholarship
As increasing appellate caseloads strain judicial and support resources available to appellate courts, the incentive for streamlining and expediting the appellate process to accommodate the needs of courts, counsel and litigants also increases. Traditional means for increasing work output, such as addition of judgeships and legal and clerical support staff, are often compromised by general funding problems facing many state jurisdictions, as well as the federal government. As a consequence, alternative means for expediting are sought, including reduction of judicial time involved for review of individual cases, restriction of oral argument and limitations on discretionary review. At the same time, …